04-13-04, 12:30 PM
| #1 (permalink) |
| ....... Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,911
|  Classics:
Is there a need for 'Classics' night anywhere? Im not knocking any night or any DJ in particular but I dont get it. Why does it have to be 'Classics' night to play an older song? If a DJ wants to play 'Classics' all night then why cant he do it any night? Who decides what is 'Classic' anyways? To you it might be 'Classic', to me it might be shit or vice versa. Is it 'Classic' becuase it is an older song that used to be siiiiiiiick back in the day? That doesnt make it a 'Classic' if you think about it. The whole term 'Classic' is a farce. If anything a 'Classics' night should be called 'DJ so and so's Classics", that would make much more sense if you think about it. How long does it take for a siiiiiiiiiiick tune to be a 'Classic'??? 573 days?  |
|  |
|
04-13-04, 12:46 PM
| #12 (permalink) |
| Fawkin Sowx Keed  Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: RI/MA
Posts: 9,920
|
In DJ school we were taught that a track needs to be on a Louie Devito mix or "Now thats what I call music" compilation in order to be considered a classic, unless the track has in its title all of the following words, "tonight", "love" and "feat.", in which case its automatically a classic.
|
|
| |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
