OK HERE IT GOES First off. Some people might question the validity of these numbers (myself included). We can all see that, according to server access logs posted by "the moo" over the summer, these numbers could be consistent with the sites growth since then. Assuming that, then the number breakdown would go as follows. (PER WEEK STATS) 70,000 visitors a week (probably a little higher than the actual number of unique visitors considering company firewalls that broadcast the same IP) 6 million hits a week This works out to approximately 86 hits per visit per user. Note that the server probably logs hits as clicks AND requests for pictures. this number is most likely accurate, assuming a user looks at a weekends picture set and then does some clicking around. (PER MONTH STATS) Simple multiplication by 4 (number of weeks in a month) shows that "the moo's" hits and visitor numbers are somewhat consistent. Not bad site traffic assuming "the moo" has not registered with any search engines. Again, assuming these numbers are true, the site must be costing almost $500 a month to run, for the use of a dedicated server. The only number that is a little misleading could be the 300,000 visitors a month. Probably about 90% (270,000) of these visitors are repeat visitors. I would assume that the site content keeps most of the visitors returning. Considering the fact that he has not registered with any search engines these numbers are excellent. I just came out of my hole to post. Keep up the good work "the moo".