judson
-
Posts
65 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Posts posted by judson
-
-
hello. i've got 4 extra tickets for lee burridge in bed tonight.
the tix are 25 each.
i've got 3 extra tickets for danny howells at the pawn shop. i the tix are 25 each.
hit me back at boyles_nyc@yahoo.com if you are interested.
judson
-
any advice of where to go, otherwise? it appears that there are no headliners in town that weekend. i'd like to go to a smaller venue, anyway.
out,
judson
p.s. kleinenberg and howells definitely play some funky stuff. danny in particular plays some funky stuff, some soulful stuff, some techno stuff.
-
Hello all,
I'm coming to South Beach from Dc on January 20 through the 24th. Any recommendations of good places to hit for clubbing or lounging. I know about the superclubs (Crobar, Space), so I'm looking for recommendations off the beaten path. FYI. I'm a proggy and funky haus head (a la Kleinenberg and Howells). Your recommendations are much appreciated.
out,
judson
-
Every Danny fan should listen to his set at Space (Miami) from October 16, 2002. The first 20 minutes or so are classic Danny. If anyone can help me id these tracks, I'll be your best friend.
out,
judson
-
it depends. i heard him do a set at the roxy last year and it was horrible. he did a lot of tribal, which is not my cup of tea, though. on the other hand, i heard him do a set in miami that was incredible, very proggy, building type of set.
out,
judson
-
1. There is a mens rea element here, as the person must "knowingly" maintain, use, or allow a property to be used for the criminal purpose.
2. There is no privacy issue is having searches to enter a building, as (1) the search is not done by a government entity or at the behest of a government entity, and (2) individuals consent to the search by entering the facility.
out,
judson
-
NOTE: It's been reported that S.151 has passed the House, CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW!
Analysis
The language in the S.151 conference bill is less expansive than previous versions. Specifically, the bill does not include the "know[] or reasonably ought to know" language. Instead, the provision requires knowledge and requires that the place's purpose must be for the manufacture, distribution, storing, or use of a controlled substance. While this language is still probably dangerous, the bill's intent seems to be targeting crackhouses/opium dens/smoke houses, etc, not necessarily clubs. The language could be dangerous if a court determines that the "purpose" of the rave or other festival is illegal drug use or distribution.
Note that the law would have both civil and criminal penalties if enacted.
Section 608 of the S.151 conference bill, the "Illicit Drug Anti-Prolifieration Act of 2003" will amend section 21 U.S.C. s 856 to read as follows. This will be the operative language if the bill is passed:
Section 856 - Establishment of Manufacturing Operations
(a) Unlawful acts
Except as authorized by this subchapter, it will be unlawful to
(1) knowingly open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place, whether permanently or temporarily, for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance;
(2) manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, occupant, or mortgagee, and knowingnly and intentionally rent, lease, profit from, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.
(
Penalties Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $500,000, or both, or a fine of $2,000,000 for a person other than an individual.
© Violation as offense against property
A violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be considered an offense against property for purposes of section 3663A©(1)(A)(ii) of title 18 .
(d)(1) Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than the greater of--
(A) $250,000; or
(
2 times the gross receipts, either known or estimated, that were derived from each violation that is attributable to the person."[there is more language regarding the civil penalty, but it relates to multiple defendants and joint and several liability]
Here is a link to the entire conference bill:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/s151conf_002.pdf
Here is a link to the conference statement:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/mgrstate040903.htm
Here is the section of the crack-house statute that is to be amended:
-
NOTE: It's been reported that S.151 has passed the House, CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW!
Analysis
The language in the S.151 conference bill is less expansive than previous versions. Specifically, the bill does not include the "know[] or reasonably ought to know" language. Instead, the provision requires knowledge and requires that the place's purpose must be for the manufacture, distribution, storing, or use of a controlled substance. While this language is still probably dangerous, the bill's intent seems to be targeting crackhouses/opium dens/smoke houses, etc, not necessarily clubs. The language could be dangerous if a court determines that the "purpose" of the rave or other festival is illegal drug use or distribution.
Note that the law would have both civil and criminal penalties if enacted.
Section 608 of the S.151 conference bill, the "Illicit Drug Anti-Prolifieration Act of 2003" will amend section 21 U.S.C. s 856 to read as follows. This will be the operative language if the bill is passed:
Section 856 - Establishment of Manufacturing Operations
(a) Unlawful acts
Except as authorized by this subchapter, it will be unlawful to
(1) knowingly open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place, whether permanently or temporarily, for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance;
(2) manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, occupant, or mortgagee, and knowingnly and intentionally rent, lease, profit from, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.
(
Penalties Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $500,000, or both, or a fine of $2,000,000 for a person other than an individual.
© Violation as offense against property
A violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be considered an offense against property for purposes of section 3663A©(1)(A)(ii) of title 18 .
(d)(1) Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than the greater of--
(A) $250,000; or
(
2 times the gross receipts, either known or estimated, that were derived from each violation that is attributable to the person."[there is more language regarding the civil penalty, but it relates to multiple defendants and joint and several liability]
Here is a link to the entire conference bill:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/s151conf_002.pdf
Here is a link to the conference statement:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/mgrstate040903.htm
Here is the section of the crack-house statute that is to be amended:
-
NOTE: It's been reported that S.151 has passed the House, CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW!
Analysis
The language in the S.151 conference bill is less expansive than previous versions. Specifically, the bill does not include the "know[] or reasonably ought to know" language. Instead, the provision requires knowledge and requires that the place's purpose must be for the manufacture, distribution, storing, or use of a controlled substance. While this language is still probably dangerous, the bill's intent seems to be targeting crackhouses/opium dens/smoke houses, etc, not necessarily clubs. The language could be dangerous if a court determines that the "purpose" of the rave or other festival is illegal drug use or distribution.
Note that the law would have both civil and criminal penalties if enacted.
Section 608 of the S.151 conference bill, the "Illicit Drug Anti-Prolifieration Act of 2003" will amend section 21 U.S.C. s 856 to read as follows. This will be the operative language if the bill is passed:
Section 856 - Establishment of Manufacturing Operations
(a) Unlawful acts
Except as authorized by this subchapter, it will be unlawful to
(1) knowingly open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place, whether permanently or temporarily, for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance;
(2) manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, occupant, or mortgagee, and knowingnly and intentionally rent, lease, profit from, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.
(
Penalties Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $500,000, or both, or a fine of $2,000,000 for a person other than an individual.
© Violation as offense against property
A violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be considered an offense against property for purposes of section 3663A©(1)(A)(ii) of title 18 .
(d)(1) Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than the greater of--
(A) $250,000; or
(
2 times the gross receipts, either known or estimated, that were derived from each violation that is attributable to the person."[there is more language regarding the civil penalty, but it relates to multiple defendants and joint and several liability]
Here is a link to the entire conference bill:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/s151conf_002.pdf
Here is a link to the conference statement:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/mgrstate040903.htm
Here is the section of the crack-house statute that is to be amended:
-
NOTE: It's been reported that S.151 has passed the House, CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW!
Analysis
The language in the S.151 conference bill is less expansive than previous versions. Specifically, the bill does not include the "know[] or reasonably ought to know" language. Instead, the provision requires knowledge and requires that the place's purpose must be for the manufacture, distribution, storing, or use of a controlled substance. While this language is still probably dangerous, the bill's intent seems to be targeting crackhouses/opium dens/smoke houses, etc, not necessarily clubs. The language could be dangerous if a court determines that the "purpose" of the rave or other festival is illegal drug use or distribution.
Note that the law would have both civil and criminal penalties if enacted.
Section 608 of the S.151 conference bill, the "Illicit Drug Anti-Prolifieration Act of 2003" will amend section 21 U.S.C. s 856 to read as follows. This will be the operative language if the bill is passed:
Section 856 - Establishment of Manufacturing Operations
(a) Unlawful acts
Except as authorized by this subchapter, it will be unlawful to
(1) knowingly open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place, whether permanently or temporarily, for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance;
(2) manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, occupant, or mortgagee, and knowingnly and intentionally rent, lease, profit from, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.
(
Penalties Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $500,000, or both, or a fine of $2,000,000 for a person other than an individual.
© Violation as offense against property
A violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be considered an offense against property for purposes of section 3663A©(1)(A)(ii) of title 18 .
(d)(1) Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than the greater of--
(A) $250,000; or
(
2 times the gross receipts, either known or estimated, that were derived from each violation that is attributable to the person."[there is more language regarding the civil penalty, but it relates to multiple defendants and joint and several liability]
Here is a link to the entire conference bill:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/s151conf_002.pdf
Here is a link to the conference statement:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/mgrstate040903.htm
Here is the section of the crack-house statute that is to be amended:
-
NOTE: It's been reported that S.151 has passed the House, CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW!
Analysis
The language in the S.151 conference bill is less expansive than previous versions. Specifically, the bill does not include the "know[] or reasonably ought to know" language. Instead, the provision requires knowledge and requires that the place's purpose must be for the manufacture, distribution, storing, or use of a controlled substance. While this language is still probably dangerous, the bill's intent seems to be targeting crackhouses/opium dens/smoke houses, etc, not necessarily clubs. The language could be dangerous if a court determines that the "purpose" of the rave or other festival is illegal drug use or distribution.
Note that the law would have both civil and criminal penalties if enacted.
Section 608 of the S.151 conference bill, the "Illicit Drug Anti-Prolifieration Act of 2003" will amend section 21 U.S.C. s 856 to read as follows. This will be the operative language if the bill is passed:
Section 856 - Establishment of Manufacturing Operations
(a) Unlawful acts
Except as authorized by this subchapter, it will be unlawful to
(1) knowingly open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place, whether permanently or temporarily, for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance;
(2) manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, occupant, or mortgagee, and knowingnly and intentionally rent, lease, profit from, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.
(
Penalties Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $500,000, or both, or a fine of $2,000,000 for a person other than an individual.
© Violation as offense against property
A violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be considered an offense against property for purposes of section 3663A©(1)(A)(ii) of title 18 .
(d)(1) Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than the greater of--
(A) $250,000; or
(
2 times the gross receipts, either known or estimated, that were derived from each violation that is attributable to the person."[there is more language regarding the civil penalty, but it relates to multiple defendants and joint and several liability]
Here is a link to the entire conference bill:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/s151conf_002.pdf
Here is a link to the conference statement:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/mgrstate040903.htm
Here is the section of the crack-house statute that is to be amended:
-
NOTE: It's been reported that S.151 has passed the House, CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW!
Analysis
The language in the S.151 conference bill is less expansive than previous versions. Specifically, the bill does not include the "know[] or reasonably ought to know" language. Instead, the provision requires knowledge and requires that the place's purpose must be for the manufacture, distribution, storing, or use of a controlled substance. While this language is still probably dangerous, the bill's intent seems to be targeting crackhouses/opium dens/smoke houses, etc, not necessarily clubs. The language could be dangerous if a court determines that the "purpose" of the rave or other festival is illegal drug use or distribution.
Note that the law would have both civil and criminal penalties if enacted.
Section 608 of the S.151 conference bill, the "Illicit Drug Anti-Prolifieration Act of 2003" will amend section 21 U.S.C. s 856 to read as follows. This will be the operative language if the bill is passed:
Section 856 - Establishment of Manufacturing Operations
(a) Unlawful acts
Except as authorized by this subchapter, it will be unlawful to
(1) knowingly open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place, whether permanently or temporarily, for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance;
(2) manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, occupant, or mortgagee, and knowingnly and intentionally rent, lease, profit from, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.
(
Penalties Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $500,000, or both, or a fine of $2,000,000 for a person other than an individual.
© Violation as offense against property
A violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be considered an offense against property for purposes of section 3663A©(1)(A)(ii) of title 18 .
(d)(1) Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than the greater of--
(A) $250,000; or
(
2 times the gross receipts, either known or estimated, that were derived from each violation that is attributable to the person."[there is more language regarding the civil penalty, but it relates to multiple defendants and joint and several liability]
Here is a link to the entire conference bill:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/s151conf_002.pdf
Here is a link to the conference statement:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/mgrstate040903.htm
Here is the section of the crack-house statute that is to be amended:
-
NOTE: It's been reported that S.151 has passed the House, CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW!
Analysis
The language in the S.151 conference bill is less expansive than previous versions. Specifically, the bill does not include the "know[] or reasonably ought to know" language. Instead, the provision requires knowledge and requires that the place's purpose must be for the manufacture, distribution, storing, or use of a controlled substance. While this language is still probably dangerous, the bill's intent seems to be targeting crackhouses/opium dens/smoke houses, etc, not necessarily clubs. The language could be dangerous if a court determines that the "purpose" of the rave or other festival is illegal drug use or distribution.
Note that the law would have both civil and criminal penalties if enacted.
Section 608 of the S.151 conference bill, the "Illicit Drug Anti-Prolifieration Act of 2003" will amend section 21 U.S.C. s 856 to read as follows. This will be the operative language if the bill is passed:
Section 856 - Establishment of Manufacturing Operations
(a) Unlawful acts
Except as authorized by this subchapter, it will be unlawful to
(1) knowingly open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place, whether permanently or temporarily, for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance;
(2) manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, occupant, or mortgagee, and knowingnly and intentionally rent, lease, profit from, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.
(
Penalties Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $500,000, or both, or a fine of $2,000,000 for a person other than an individual.
© Violation as offense against property
A violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be considered an offense against property for purposes of section 3663A©(1)(A)(ii) of title 18 .
(d)(1) Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than the greater of--
(A) $250,000; or
(
2 times the gross receipts, either known or estimated, that were derived from each violation that is attributable to the person."[there is more language regarding the civil penalty, but it relates to multiple defendants and joint and several liability]
Here is a link to the entire conference bill:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/s151conf_002.pdf
Here is a link to the conference statement:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/mgrstate040903.htm
Here is the section of the crack-house statute that is to be amended:
-
NOTE: It's been reported that S.151 has passed the House, CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW!
Analysis
The language in the S.151 conference bill is less expansive than previous versions. Specifically, the bill does not include the "know[] or reasonably ought to know" language. Instead, the provision requires knowledge and requires that the place's purpose must be for the manufacture, distribution, storing, or use of a controlled substance. While this language is still probably dangerous, the bill's intent seems to be targeting crackhouses/opium dens/smoke houses, etc, not necessarily clubs. The language could be dangerous if a court determines that the "purpose" of the rave or other festival is illegal drug use or distribution.
Note that the law would have both civil and criminal penalties if enacted.
Section 608 of the S.151 conference bill, the "Illicit Drug Anti-Prolifieration Act of 2003" will amend section 21 U.S.C. s 856 to read as follows. This will be the operative language if the bill is passed:
Section 856 - Establishment of Manufacturing Operations
(a) Unlawful acts
Except as authorized by this subchapter, it will be unlawful to
(1) knowingly open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place, whether permanently or temporarily, for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance;
(2) manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, occupant, or mortgagee, and knowingnly and intentionally rent, lease, profit from, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.
(
Penalties Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $500,000, or both, or a fine of $2,000,000 for a person other than an individual.
© Violation as offense against property
A violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be considered an offense against property for purposes of section 3663A©(1)(A)(ii) of title 18 .
(d)(1) Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than the greater of--
(A) $250,000; or
(
2 times the gross receipts, either known or estimated, that were derived from each violation that is attributable to the person."[there is more language regarding the civil penalty, but it relates to multiple defendants and joint and several liability]
Here is a link to the entire conference bill:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/s151conf_002.pdf
Here is a link to the conference statement:
http://www.house.gov/judiciary/mgrstate040903.htm
Here is the section of the crack-house statute that is to be amended:
-
Join us tonight as we move over to the Spy Lounge side of Felix.
Shake it, stir it, drink it,
judson
==============================
Felix Mondays with dj judson
A melange of house, trance, and get down funky music
Felix (in Adams Morgan)
2406 18th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009
9:30ish -
no cover, no dress code, no attitude
==============================
-
Felix Mondays with dj judson
A melange of house, trance, and get down funky music
Felix
Adams Morgan
2406 18th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009
9:30ish - 1:30ish
no cover, no attitude.
===================
last week's first installment of "Felix Mondays with dj judson" was a great success. we're creating something really special and hope that you'll join us. it's worth checking out for a drink or two. hopefully, i'll get you hooked in the process.
out,
judson
-
in addition to velvet, there's badlands (now Apex) (www.badlandsdc.com) in Dupont Circle. that's about it, i think. of course, most gay bars play circuit and pop music.
in my opinion, the music at most of these venues is really stale. places like buzz (www.buzzlife.com) (now in baltimore) and vision (www.visionfridays.com), ultraworld (www.ultraworld.net) (a one-off production company that also runs Sonar Lounge in baltimore), and DC Skillz (www.dcskillz.com) (another one-off production company) have fairly large gay presence (10-15%) and much better music.
out,
judson
-
hi. i'm looking to throw a private party on New Year's Eve and i need to find a space. does anyone have any suggestions? i'm looking for a venue with a decent sound system, danceable space.
any ideas? please please.
out,
judson
-
anyone know what the set times are or how long is Digweed playing? also, anyone have any suggested arrival time.
i'm driving from DC and trying coordinate.
out,
judson
-
Hi. I've never been to the WMC. What are the benefits of registering and the disadvantages of not registering. Any help is greatly appreciated.
out,
judson
-
I lived in Paris in 1994, so here are my suggestions.
1. Go to the Louvre, but only check out the following:
A. the old Louvre castle. It was discovered when they excavated the courtyard to install the Pei pyramids.
B. the Louis VIII (?) apartments.
2. Go to Notre Dame, but try to go during a service
3. Sainte-Chapelle (near Notre Dame)
4. Definitely take one of the river boats (bateux mouches), but only at night. They are touristy, but definitely worth it.
5. The Opera. Try to see a show there too (ballet productions).
6. The New Opera House (at the Place de la Bastille). Beautiful.
7. Skip the D'Orsee unless you are a big impressionist fan.
8. Instead of visiting the Eiffel Tower, go to Montmatre and see the view from there.
9. There is a fun sangria bar called Bar 10 near the Odeon.
10. Eat in as many bistros as possible. Prix fixe menus never fail.
11. Check out the Arab Museum on the Left Bank.
12. Definitely definitely check out the catacombs, but watch your head.
13. I'm not really sure what clubs still exist, but Queen was always fun, as well as L'Arc.
14. I would definitely skip Versailles. There are better ways to allot your time during a 4-day visit.
15. Probably most importantly, always find out what a drink costs in a club b/f you order it. I had a couple of $20 cocktails.
out,
judson
-
Anyone know any good events happening the weekend of November 8-10 in NYC. There's lots happening this week and the following week, but I don't see anything good that weekend. Ideas?
out,
judson
-
this isn't a problem unique to the U.S. most countries require work permits if you are not a citizen. his fault.
out,
judson
-
Deep Dish is doing an upcoming GU. There was a squib about it in the issue of Mixer I received yesterday.
out,
judson
Penalties
Help: Sultan (Mansion) vs. Fanciulli (Studio B)
in New York / New Jersey
Posted
My birthday is Friday and four of us are going out. We're gay, old skool Arc/Vinyl people, looking for no bullshit fun. I'm a big fan of Sultan and the whole Yoshitoshi scene. While living in DC, Deep Dish had a monthly residency at buzz and that was our bread and butter. Nevertheless, Mansion sounds like bullshit. I hate bottle service and it sounds like there's no more dancefloor.
My dilemma. Is it better to deal with Mansion and go really late (after 2 AM) when it may have thinned out, or should we venture to Studio B to see Nic Fanciulli. I used to be a big Fanciulli fan, but the recorded sets I've heard lately sound incredibly boring.
Thoughts?