rusbus01

had sooooooo much fun still recovering does anyone know where i can find the pictures from that party

ill be there ill be the guy with his shirt off and hair spiked and a zoro mask try to find me lol

WHOA

fuck a/x

the freaks are coming out that night be rdy:beer:

ill bee completly shitfaced...... naked besides my zoro mask and whip dancing to that dark beattttttttt

ILL BReak it down read slowly children "New York City's Human Rights Law forbids discrimination based on race, creed, sex, and other grounds by any "place of public accommodation, resort or amusement," "but specifically exempts "any institution, club or place of accommodation which is in its nature distinctly private." However, a 1984 amendment (Local Law 63) provides that any "institution, club or place of accommodation," other than a benevolent order or a religious corporation, "shall not be considered in its nature distinctly private" benevolent order or a religious corporation....... As far as I know crobar is neither which makes considered a "place of public accommodation, resort or amusement," now so you dont have to re read "New York City's Human Rights Law forbids discrimination based on race, creed, sex, and other grounds by any "place of public accommodation, resort or amusement,"

"OK Crobar does not even come close to a place or accomodation" "place of public accommodation, resort or amusement,"...... Id like to emphazize the "resort or amusement" part from my original post.

IF people want to play lawyer I suggest you do futher research before you make yourself look stupid........PLEASE STOP BEING IGNORANT.

Just because it's privately owned doesnt allow crobar to discriminate......IF crobar was a country club with paying members that would be a diffrent story New York City's Human Rights Law forbids discrimination based on race, creed, sex, and other grounds by any "place of public accommodation, resort or amusement," but specifically exempts "any institution, club or place of accommodation which is in its nature distinctly private." However, a 1984 amendment (Local Law 63) provides that any "institution, club or place of accommodation," other than a benevolent order or a religious corporation, "shall not be considered in its nature distinctly private" if it "has more than four hundred members, provides regular meal service and regularly receives payment . . . directly or indirectly from or on behalf of nonmembers for the furtherance of trade or business." Immediately after Local Law 63 became effective, appellant association filed a state-court suit against the city and some of its officials, seeking, inter alia, a declaration that the Law is unconstitutional on its face under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The trial court entered a judgment upholding the Law, and the intermediate state appellate court and the Court of Appeals of New York affirmed.

hahahah u and ricky

im staying home so i can function on thanksgiving with my whole family...