Jump to content
Clubplanet Nightlife Community

PA leader: Israel has no right to exist


igloo

Recommended Posts

Sharon, IDF, "their" land, security fences... :blah: :blah: :blah: :blah:

Wake up appeasers......wake up apologists....

PA leader: Israel has no right to exist

Jewish state 'Satan's offspring' which can't be 'among human beings'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: February 17, 2004

4:40 p.m. Eastern

© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

Although Yasser Arafat has acceded in peace talks to Israel's right to exist, Palestinian officials indicate otherwise.

In an interview broadcast on Palestinian Authority television, Ahmad Nasser, secretary of the Palestinian Legislative Council, said the Jewish state has no right to exist because it is "Satan's offspring."

Nasser asserted Israel cannot exist "among human beings" because it was "founded on the basis of robbery, terror, killing, torture, assassination, death, stealing land and killing people," reported Palestinian Media Watch.

President George W. Bush and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon have agreed to the concept of "two states living side by side."

But Nasser's comments "reflect the PA's continuing campaign to challenge and deny Israel's right to exist," says PMW director Itamar Marcus.

Marcus notes Nasser, in his interview, even criticized Israel for its willingness to release 400 Arab terrorists and prisoners, arguing it was its way of putting a value on Palestinians.

"We see that Israel is trying to delude the world and delude the Arabs and the Palestinians psychologically [by showing] that one Israeli will be exchanged for a thousand Palestinians," he told PA TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by normalnoises

JUSTICE FOR PALESTINE

after all the historical facts, discussions and arguments- here is what you are left to deal with today-

1-an muslim nation bent on the destruction of jews and israel

2-a muslim nation that has staged war against israel- and as a result of the war- the muslim instigators have lost land, and have lost lives- both military and infortunately civilians-

these are the consequences of what happens when you LOSE a war- you lose land- you lose lives you either negotiate a peaceful solution- or the war continues-and as a losers- they will continue to lose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by babbo

after all the historical facts, discussions and arguments- here is what you are left to deal with today-

1-an muslim nation bent on the destruction of jews and israel

2-a muslim nation that has staged war against israel- and as a result of the war- the muslim instigators have lost land, and have lost lives- both military and infortunately civilians-

these are the consequences of what happens when you LOSE a war- you lose land- you lose lives you either negotiate a peaceful solution- or the war continues-and as a losers- they will continue to lose

so genius - what is your SOLUTION for those people living on that land? Funny how you Israeli sympahizers always skirt that question. Are you going to make them Israeli citizens? Are you going to "expel" them?

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by raver_mania

There are many in the Sharon government who don't want a Palestinian state established because of "biblical reasons".

So? Goes both ways - to point out the fault on just one side is trying to fit the facts to a pre-imposed theory.

Raver....come'on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by igloo

Raver....come'on.

no, seriously...I've posted articles before where the right-wing nut-jobs in the govt think a Palestinian state should never be formed (there still are).

BTW, do you have a link to this article. Haven't been able to find it on Haaretz or jpost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry igloo - Worldnetdaily is not exactly an unbiased source. Reading about Joseph Farah, and his speeches, he leans very right-wing.

I haven't found this particular article anywhere else.

Compared to the other articles I've read onthe topic of the Australian mufti, the WN piece leans very much toward potraying the guy in as bad a light as possible.

Talk about a hard right-wing bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by raver_mania

sorry igloo - Worldnetdaily is not exactly an unbiased source. Reading about Joseph Farah, and his speeches, he leans very right-wing.

I haven't found this particular article anywhere else.

Compared to the other articles I've read onthe topic of the Australian mufti, the WN piece leans very much toward potraying the guy in as bad a light as possible.

Talk about a hard right-wing bias.

Raver, Farah may be right wing and worldnet may be biased, but that still does not dismiss or discount the PA leader making those comments, and worse yet, believing them.

It is not the first time, and it will not be the last time either.

I do not care if the article appeared on Rush Limbaugh, rightwing.com, fuckpalestine.com, etc....

"Israel has no right to exist" is the prevailing belief that exists and is taught, and can not be dismissed because it appears in something that may or even is biased.

In addition, to dismiss anything because it appears in something that may be "biased" towards the right means that you must equally dismiss something if it appears in something that may be biased towards the left....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by igloo

Raver, Farah may be right wing and worldnet may be biased, but that still does not dismiss or discount the PA leader making those comments, and worse yet, believing them.

It is not the first time, and it will not be the last time either.

I do not care if the article appeared on Rush Limbaugh, rightwing.com, fuckpalestine.com, etc....

"Israel has no right to exist" is the prevailing belief that exists and is taught, and can not be dismissed because it appears in something that may or even is biased.

In addition, to dismiss anything because it appears in something that may be "biased" towards the right means that you must equally dismiss something if it appears in something that may be biased towards the left....

Thats why I don't read Palestinechronicle.com.

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...