ernextnation Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 Which one u think is better?this one: or Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philippio Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 Never tried either of them but I believe quality-wise, Allen & Heaths are more recognized. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lolahotass Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 I usually prefer cranberry as my mixer with Vodka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ernextnation Posted April 27 Author Report Share Posted April 27 I usually prefer cranberry as my mixer with Vodka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digital7 Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 I usually prefer cranberry as my mixer with Vodka maybe throw a little OJ in there for a Madras Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lolahotass Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 maybe throw a little OJ in there for a Madras How about I throw you in there and shake you all around.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ernextnation Posted April 27 Author Report Share Posted April 27 How about I throw you in there and shake you all around.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sebastianc Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 I've never used the Allen & Heath but I swear by the Pioneer 600. I bought mine almost 4 years and its still kicking ass. If your into effects this is the perfect mixer, very user friendly and extremely dynamic in its capabilies. IMO has everything you need, especially for a home set up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djcarlosf Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 get a xone:92 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digital7 Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 How about I throw you in there and shake you all around.. I <3 Lola we need to hang bebah.. its been awhile! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digital7 Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 stop hating Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ernextnation Posted April 27 Author Report Share Posted April 27 get a xone:92 If I could afford the xone 92 I wouldnt be asking that question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djkable Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 these are two different types of mixers, with different intensions regarding application...the Pioneer is definitely a good mixer... it gives you some more options than the A&H 32, and it has a pretty ergonomic placement of functions.... those EQ pots are a little larger than most other mixers as well. also, if it's any gauge to go by, it's a very popular install in a lot of clubs. but the sound quality on the A&H is hard to beat (it will keep your vinyl's intended warm analog sound). the DRS presets are a nice function you don't see every day. with the 3-ch, you loose some options as i said before, but simplicity is sometimes the preferred route. also, the x-fader is better than the Pioneer's (a consideration if you're a scratch dj)...yet, it's an x/y setup....meaning, it's not assignable (it's split between ch-1 and ch-3....ch-2 is not routed through the x-fader). it really depends on what's important to you, and how you are going to use it...if you have more than just two turntables... ie: a couple of CDJ's in addition (or if you're planning to expand your setup, of course), i'd go with the Pioneer..... but if you want simplicity, with an unmatched sound, go with the A&H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ernextnation Posted April 27 Author Report Share Posted April 27 these are two different types of mixers, with different intensions regarding application...the Pioneer is definitely a good mixer... it gives you some more options than the A&H 32, and it has a pretty ergonomic placement of functions.... those EQ pots are a little larger than most other mixers as well. also, if it's any gauge to go by, it's a very popular install in a lot of clubs. but the sound quality on the A&H is hard to beat (it will keep your vinyl's intended warm analog sound). the DRS presets are a nice function you don't see every day. with the 3-ch, you loose some options as i said before, but simplicity is sometimes the preferred route. also, the x-fader is better than the Pioneer's (a consideration if you're a scratch dj)...yet, it's an x/y setup....meaning, it's not assignable (it's split between ch-1 and ch-3....ch-2 is not routed through the x-fader). it really depends on what's important to you, and how you are going to use it...if you have more than just two turntables... ie: a couple of CDJ's in addition (or if you're planning to expand your setup, of course), i'd go with the Pioneer..... but if you want simplicity, with an unmatched sound, go with the A&H.Thanx a lot. I may have to save some more and get the xzone 92 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djkable Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 Thanx a lot. I may have to save some more and get the xzone 92the 92 is no joke. the price is nothing to laugh about either... (ouch)if you've got senseless money to blow, i guess it makes no difference.is it worth it completely? that's debatable.... for all that money, you'd think the pot-placement would be less "crowded". it's flooded with options though (obvious)... but most likely, i bet 90% of the people that bought one aren't using the midi-out capabilities....heh. i do very much like the rotary faders on each channel though..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.