Jump to content
Clubplanet Nightlife Community

The media's war


igloo

Recommended Posts

The media's war

Dec 13, 2005

by Thomas Sowell ( bio | archive | contact )

The media seem to have come up with a formula that would make any war in history unwinnable and unbearable: They simply emphasize the enemy's victories and our losses.

Losses suffered by the enemy are not news, no matter how large, how persistent, or how clearly they indicate the enemy's declining strength.

What are the enemy's victories in Iraq? The killing of Americans and the killing of Iraqi civilians. Both are big news in the mainstream media, day in and day out, around the clock.

Has anyone ever believed that any war could be fought without deaths on both sides? Every death is a tragedy to the individual killed and to his loved ones. But is there anything about American casualty rates in Iraq that makes them more severe than casualty rates in any other war we have fought?

On the contrary, the American deaths in Iraqi are a fraction of what they have been in other wars in our history. The media have made a big production about the cumulative fatalities in Iraq, hyping the thousandth death with multiple full-page features in the New York Times and comparable coverage on TV.

The two-thousandth death was similarly anticipated almost impatiently in the media and then made another big splash. But does media hype make 2,000 wartime fatalities in more than two years unusual?

The Marines lost more than 5,000 men taking one island in the Pacific during a three-month period in World War II. In the Civil War, the Confederates lost 5,000 men in one battle in one day.

Yet there was Jim Lehrer on the "News Hour" last week earnestly asking Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld about the ten Americans killed that day. It is hard to imagine anybody in any previous war asking any such question of anyone responsible for fighting a war.

We have lost more men than that in our most overwhelming and one-sided victories in previous wars. During an aerial battle over the Mariannas islands in World War II, Americans shot down hundreds of Japanese planes while losing about 30 of their own.

If the media of that era had been reporting the way the media report today, all we would have heard about would have been that more than two dozen Americans were killed that day.

Neither our troops nor the terrorists are in Iraq just to be killed. Both have objectives. But any objectives we achieve get short shrift in the mainstream media, if they are mentioned at all.

Our troops can kill ten times as many of the enemy as they kill and it just isn't news worth featuring, if it is mentioned at all, in much of the media. No matter how many towns are wrested from the control of the terrorists by American or Iraqi troops, it just isn't front-page news like the casualty reports or even the doom-saying of some politicians.

The fact that these doom-saying politicians have been proved wrong, again and again, does not keep their latest outcries from overshadowing the hard-won victories of American troops on the ground in Iraq.

The doom-sayers claimed that terrorist attacks would make it impossible to hold the elections last January because so many Iraqis would be afraid to go vote. The doom-sayers urged that the elections be postponed.

But a higher percentage of Iraqis voted in that election -- and in a subsequent election -- than the percentage of Americans who voted in last year's Presidential elections.

Utter ignorance of history enables any war with any casualties to be depicted in the media as an unmitigated disaster.

Even after Nazi Germany surrendered at the end of World War II, die-hard Nazi guerrilla units terrorized and assassinated both German officials and German civilians who cooperated with Allied occupation authorities.

But nobody suggested that we abandon the country. Nobody was foolish enough to think that you could say in advance when you would pull out or that you should encourage your enemies by announcing a timetable.

There has never been the slightest doubt that we would begin pulling troops out of Iraq when it was feasible. Only time and circumstances can tell when that will be. And only irresponsible politicians and the media think otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither our troops nor the terrorists are in Iraq just to be killed. Both have objectives. But any objectives we achieve get short shrift in the mainstream media, if they are mentioned at all.

Our troops can kill ten times as many of the enemy as they kill and it just isn't news worth featuring, if it is mentioned at all, in much of the media. No matter how many towns are wrested from the control of the terrorists by American or Iraqi troops, it just isn't front-page news like the casualty reports or even the doom-saying of some politicians.

The fact that these doom-saying politicians have been proved wrong, again and again, does not keep their latest outcries from overshadowing the hard-won victories of American troops on the ground in Iraq.

The doom-sayers claimed that terrorist attacks would make it impossible to hold the elections last January because so many Iraqis would be afraid to go vote. The doom-sayers urged that the elections be postponed.

But a higher percentage of Iraqis voted in that election -- and in a subsequent election -- than the percentage of Americans who voted in last year's Presidential elections.

Utter ignorance of history enables any war with any casualties to be depicted in the media as an unmitigated disaster.

Even after Nazi Germany surrendered at the end of World War II, die-hard Nazi guerrilla units terrorized and assassinated both German officials and German civilians who cooperated with Allied occupation authorities.

But nobody suggested that we abandon the country. Nobody was foolish enough to think that you could say in advance when you would pull out or that you should encourage your enemies by announcing a timetable.

There has never been the slightest doubt that we would begin pulling troops out of Iraq when it was feasible. Only time and circumstances can tell when that will be. And only irresponsible politicians and the media think otherwise.

Good post!

The last paragraph really stuck out for me. It's as if the critics want to try and position themselves to claim credit for returning troops by their 24/7 bitching. In reality, their return will be dictated by their success, not some opportunistic, pre-calculating politrixta'.

What's next, are the critics going to start demanding & predicting more water for dry crops at the beginning of the rainy season? Wow! Brilliant....NOT!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome post!...

Seriously sums up a few relevant views nicely in a nutshell. I'd like to see anyone pick and pull and mis-interpret this one. Probably will be one of those deals where no one will reply except the supporting.

luv it.

In retrospect though...

"But a higher percentage of Iraqis voted in that election -- and in a subsequent election -- than the percentage of Americans who voted in last year's Presidential elections."

Reminded me of how I felt when those gruelling days went down. I just got stationed here in bragg and within a couple weeks, about 2/3rds of my friends that I went through training with... went over for security in regards to the election. No one.. not even the general (pessamistic if I may add) public was really expecting such a result. Not only the ironic percentage surpassing our own voters... but the fact that minimalizing uprisings and controlling security points..etc... worked beautifully.

And the best part of it all... The iraqi public was warned that if ANYONE voted... not just themselves, but their entire family would be slaughter as well..

AND STILL....

I got goose bumps and yes.. even a fucking slight lump in my throat that day...

beautiful it was...

ok... isnt it time for some post in regards to how it was a fixed election and we really corrupted the whole system or something???

destruction.. its time for your delusions...

go ahead...

im ready....

I have a reallllllly big spoon ..and an empty stomach from starving for days...

feeed me the bullshit will ya....

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome post!...

Seriously sums up a few relevant views nicely in a nutshell. I'd like to see anyone pick and pull and mis-interpret this one. Probably will be one of those deals where no one will reply except the supporting.

luv it.

In retrospect though...

"But a higher percentage of Iraqis voted in that election -- and in a subsequent election -- than the percentage of Americans who voted in last year's Presidential elections."

Reminded me of how I felt when those gruelling days went down. I just got stationed here in bragg and within a couple weeks, about 2/3rds of my friends that I went through training with... went over for security in regards to the election. No one.. not even the general (pessamistic if I may add) public was really expecting such a result. Not only the ironic percentage surpassing our own voters... but the fact that minimalizing uprisings and controlling security points..etc... worked beautifully.

And the best part of it all... The iraqi public was warned that if ANYONE voted... not just themselves, but their entire family would be slaughter as well..

AND STILL....

I got goose bumps and yes.. even a fucking slight lump in my throat that day...

beautiful it was...

ok... isnt it time for some post in regards to how it was a fixed election and we really corrupted the whole system or something???

destruction.. its time for your delusions...

go ahead...

im ready....

I have a reallllllly big spoon ..and an empty stomach from starving for days...

feeed me the bullshit will ya....

:P

I hear ya'! I felt the same.

Don't hold your breath on destruction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...