Jump to content
Clubplanet Nightlife Community
Sign in to follow this  
Guest obby

Powell: Bush Right to Assume Iraq Had WMDs

Recommended Posts

Guest obby

Wednesday, July 21, 2004 11:08 p.m. EDT

Powell: Bush Right to Assume Iraq Had WMDs

Secretary of State Colin Powell said Wednesday that President Bush was correct to believe that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction before the U.S. attacked in March 2003.

"The intelligence picture that was presented to the Congress, presented to me, presented to the president by the intelligence community led the president to the conclusion - the correct conclusion - that you had to assume that these weapons were there," Powell told a national radio host.

"And the president acted on that knowledge," he added.

But Powell said he doubted a report earlier today that three nuclear warheads had been uncovered by Iraqi officials in Saddam's hometown of Tikrit, "I'd be surprised if they found any such thing." quoted Powell.

Powell also said he was concerned about reports that former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger had removed top secret documents from the National Archives that were earmarked for review by the 9/11 Commission.

"It's a very serious matter," he said, adding that he expected Berger to cooperate with Justice Department probers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest endymion

Yes, we remember Powell and his little vial of anthrax on the UN floor. We're aware that he was on board with the WMD justification. What's he going to do now other than defend his position? He's going to say 'oh no, we were wrong, gee that vial of anthrax prop was a silly stunt since it was all a lie...'

If you guys value Powell's opinion so much then you might want to think back to how he was the one telling the neoconservatives that such a small invasion force would be sheer lunacy and that we were headed for another Vietnam if we did it that way.

He was convinced that an invasion force of 135,000 would result in undefended supply lines that would allow insurgents to easily harrass poorly-guarded supply convoys and that we would not be able to ensure security after the initial blitzkrieg into Baghdad.

One out of two is a decent record I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×