Jump to content
Clubplanet Nightlife Community
Sign in to follow this  
Guest web_norah

Stem Cell Research & C Reeves

Recommended Posts

Guest web_norah

Reeve Championed Spinal Cord Research

Christopher Reeve often said he wanted to be known for something other than playing Superman. But it was real life — not another movie role — that gave the actor the chance to star in his biggest drama: as a spinal cord injury victim championing research in hope that people like him would someday be able to walk again.

"He put a human face on the dreams," said Daniel Perry, president of the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research. "He used his star power as a celebrity for a great good that transcends anything that most of us will ever achieve."

Reeve died Sunday after developing a serious bloodstream infection from a bedsore, a common problem for paralyzed people. He went into cardiac arrest Saturday at his home in Pound Ridge, N.Y., then fell into a coma, dying the next day at a hospital.

As an actor and a man, Reeve embodied strength and athleticism and performed his own movie stunts, including his 1978 starring role as Superman. It made him famous but he longed to, as he often put it, "escape the cape" and take on other characters.

Other movies and plays gave him that chance, but nothing compared to the horseback riding accident in 1995 that left him with a broken neck. His passionate efforts for science, often as he wheezed from a respirator in his wheelchair, are his greatest legacy, admirers said. Reeve never walked again but his dream of doing so is now a plausible one for thousands of others who are paralyzed.

"The biggest hope is in biological research to allow the spinal cord to heal itself and even regenerate. That's just over the horizon but closer than ever before. Most people feel within the next 10 to 15 years, somewhere within our lifetimes," said Dr. Jack Ziegler, president of the American Spinal Injury Association.

Some even thought it would come in time for Reeve.

"I thought it was going to happen," said Dr. Doug Kerr, a Johns Hopkins University neurologist who works with stem cells — controversial research that Reeve advocated. "It was Star Wars science fiction, this concept of rewiring the nervous system," but Reeve "thrust this field forward by leaps and bounds," Kerr said.

Reeve endured years of therapy to allow him to breathe for longer periods without a respirator while seeking a cure that would allow him to walk again. He sparked hope even in many skeptics in 2000, when he was able to move an index finger. He thrust himself harder into workouts to strengthen his legs and arms, and electrical stimulation of his muscles allowed him to sporadically regain sensation in some other parts of his body.

As Reeve transformed his body, he also morphed into an advocate, first for better benefits for people with long-term disabilities, and then for science to help the 250,000 Americans who suffer paralysis. The Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation has given $40 million to spinal cord research since he merged it with the American Paralysis Foundation in 1999.

Some of that has been for embryonic stem cell research, a promising but contentious field of medicine that the Bush administration has severely restricted because it involves destroying embryos. Scientists think these early, all-purpose cells can be coaxed to form nerves and specialized tissues to repair a host of woes.

Reeve and fellow actor Michael J. Fox (news), who has Parkinson's disease (news - web sites), have helped make stem cells a major campaign issue between President Bush (news - web sites) and Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites). Kerry even mentioned Reeve during the second presidential debate on Friday and praised him Monday in remarks before a speech in Santa Fe, N.M.

"He was an inspiration to all of us and gave hope to millions of Americans who are counting on lifesaving cures that science and research can provide," Kerry said. "In part because of his work, millions will one day walk again."

At Hopkins, research a few years ago demonstrated that stem cells could allow paralyzed mice and rats to do just that.

"This is one of the most difficult tasks you can ask a stem cell to do — to rewire, to extend axons and to form new connections at great distances to restore function," said Kerr. "We're clearly getting there."

Reeve "appropriately brought a sense of urgency to this issue," said Perry head of the research coalition, which favors stem cell science. "On Capitol Hill he was such a highly regarded figure and was so focused on the message". A research center on paralytic spinal cord injuries, the Reeve-Irvine Research Center, was established in Reeve's name at the University of California, Irvine. "He was such an immense personality, such a force in the field," said Dr. Oswald Stewart, the center's director. "He created an enthusiasm for what we do in the lab." Reeve also reached out to people beyond those with spinal cord injuries.

"He was able to inspire hope in patients with diabetes, Alzheimer's, cancer, Parkinson's disease, Lou Gehrig's disease (news - web sites) ... tragic and life-threatening conditions that face tens of millions of Americans," Perry said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest obby

What good is researching stem cells if you are blown up in the process ??????

I to am concerned about our domestic issues but just not right now.

Have fun with the thread guys,

OBBY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What good is researching stem cells if you are blown up in the process ??????

I to am concerned about our domestic issues but just not right now.

Have fun with the thread guys,

OBBY

jobs, inovation etc, all keep american as strong as hunting terrorists does..

bush is an idiot on this subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JMT

so can someone please tell me the difference between EMBRYONIC stem cells and ADULT stem cells, they relate to research and benefits??

anyone, anyone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so can someone please tell me the difference between EMBRYONIC stem cells and ADULT stem cells, they relate to research and benefits??

when u use embryos the cells havent not develop and its easier to find out why people get certain diseases and it is also easier to manipulate those cells into making whatever type of cell that u want...they (the embryonic cells) havent been given a certain "job description" so they are basically all clean slates to be use for whatever...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JMT

so can someone please tell me the difference between EMBRYONIC stem cells and ADULT stem cells, they relate to research and benefits??

when u use embryos the cells havent not develop and its easier to find out why people get certain diseases and it is also easier to manipulate those cells into making whatever type of cell that u want...they (the embryonic cells) havent been given a certain "job description" so they are basically all clean slates to be use for whatever...

i see, thanks man.......didnt feel like doing net research at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest obby

so can someone please tell me the difference between EMBRYONIC stem cells and ADULT stem cells, they relate to research and benefits??

when u use embryos the cells havent not develop and its easier to find out why people get certain diseases and it is also easier to manipulate those cells into making whatever type of cell that u want...they (the embryonic cells) havent been given a certain "job description" so they are basically all clean slates to be use for whatever...

i see, thanks man.......didnt feel like doing net research at the moment.

Correct BUT it requires the killing of a life in hope to save another and yet there is no proof it works. Whatever, I am for it. Whatever it takes to help cures the ill (just not right now).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Correct BUT it requires the killing of a life in hope to save another.

u mean a life that is going to be destroyed anyways??? why throw away a life into the trash, when u can use it to cure and give life to others?? i mean Obby, i know much about this, b/c of my diabetes...this is one of the best chances i got to flat out fix my disease, imagine the other lives that can be saved...would u rather the doctors just destroy those embryos, instead of doing research and helping millions of people afflicted with diseases?

btw...there are MANY Republicans that are for stem cell as well...and they are Pro-Life

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest web_norah

i rather use the embryos to save other lives and improve the chances of a better life for those dealing with a disease. anyday.

Reeves really fought for this and he died at such young age.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×