B-SIDE1414779017 Posted September 7 Report Share Posted September 7 Although I try to remain non political on the boards, here is a new article which unbiasedly esposes the truth about what really happend with the responce to Katrinahttp://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/ns/news/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/0002%2F20050906%2F1242785787.htm&photoid=20050904WXS119&ewp=ewp_news_0905katrina_policeIt's sad to say my son will be the one who feels the impact of this fool in office, and somehow I feel i am to blame :-\Let me oficially say FV(K BUSH! Racial or not he just plain fucks things up > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest trancepriest Posted September 7 Report Share Posted September 7 The congressional staffer said: "This event affected four states. Who else could have been in charge but the president?"Bush is so damn wealthy and cut off from the reality of certain situations that he doesn't understand the impact of catastrophes that happen to regular people... even when its an entire city. The man was casual to the point of carelessness, as the New York Times stated. He's out of touch. It's like having a stoner in the oval office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PORNSTAR Posted September 7 Report Share Posted September 7 hey he did cut his vacation short by 2 days Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest slamminshaun Posted September 7 Report Share Posted September 7 The man was casual to the point of carelessness, as the New York Times stated. Didn't the New York Times also state that putting aside money for the Army Corps of Engineers to fix the levees would be a "piece of bad legislation" and referred to it as a "boondoggle"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.