fleshfreax

My clubs better than your club because mine costs more to get in so that makes it sooooooooooo much better

Yeah and worst than ever before

You still all make me want to vomit.

Im going

Why not not do shit at work everyday? If you sit in a crappy cubicle, do what I did, put a door on it. It will prevent all of those nosy bastards from storming into your cube in attempts to catch you doing something wrong. I would reccommend getting some gaffer tape. It holds up pretty well on cubicle walls and wont leave marks so no one can bitch about it later.

Osama Bin Laden lives in a hole. His life seems just peachy.

Maybe itll land in the middle east and stop all these wars. KaBoooom.

Do you have any equipment? I have a bit, but havent had a chance to move it all over to my new place and set it up.

I said that it is known that the war on drugs is not successful. This is a known fact by the government. I am not saying I totally agree with the war on drugs or disagree with it. I hate the fact that money is wasted which comes from my pay checks. I would personally like to see the US take on more lax views of softer drug usage similar to those found around Europe, but I have to agree with the bill on trying to prevent the use of harder drugs. Now, this might be way out there, but I would say that this bill is more likely there to prevent minors and those who have less knowledge of the drug from using them. How many raves do you know of that dont have more than 70% of participants under 21. If people were a bit more discrete about the usage, there would not have been this bill and in the future there will be no problems. It isnt hard for people to play normal and control themselves. I am not saying I am the model citizen. Maybe things would be easier if this was directed more as a way to protect younger party goers from hurting themselves. Face it. No one is going to stop dance music. No one has to worry about that. Raves will go on. I don't want to see clubs and parties to stop just as much as the next guy and thats not what im trying to say. This is their reaction to prevent the usage.

You tell me im wrong. Once again I quote the bill which shows that not all owners and promoters will be punished. You obviously havent read it. The statute would only be applicable if the rave promoters or location owners "knowingly and intentionally" either use or allow to be used space for an event where drugs will be "manufactured, stored, distributed, or used." This legislation will not eliminate all raves. Provided rave promoters and sponsors operate such events as they are so often advertized[sic], as places for people to come dance in a safe, alcohol-free environment, then they have nothing to fear from this law. But this legislation will give law enforcement the tools needed to shut down those rave operators and promoters who use raves as a cover to sell drugs. Innocent owners or proprietors will remain exempt from prosecution.

No one is beating my argument. No one has even quoted the bill. I have in which I have shown it does not mention anything about stopping the music and that it is not going to affect club owners who are not the ones promoting the drug use. Maybe all of you should take a good look at what it says and maybe use a dictionary to look up the big words this time so you will better understand. What do you think your argument even is?

Its not about the music. They dont care about the music. This does not mention the music at all: A BILL To prohibit an individual from knowingly opening, maintaining, managing, controlling, renting, leasing, making available for use, or profiting from any place for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance, and for other purposes. ... `(2) manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, either as an owner, lessee, agent, employee, occupant, or mortgagee, and knowingly and intentionally rent, lease, profit from, or make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.'. Still, no one states the specific line that says it is the music that they are preventing. They are targeting known areas where the drug is being used. It cites clubs and raves as being a location for misuse of a controlled substance. I am not sure where everyone thinks it says that they are prevcenting you from listneing to your music. If you search the bill for the word music, it only appears one, in the first paragraph. And, if any of you people who tell me i didnt read the entire bill, did any of you care to notice this? But this legislation will give law enforcement the tools needed to shut down those rave operators and promoters who use raves as a cover to sell drugs. Innocent owners or proprietors will remain exempt from prosecution. The innocent will remain exempt from prosecution.

That is not the same as saying you can not go out and dance or listen to whatever music you want. I think you have read it wrong.

Maybe they should call it ugly bitch fight. Looks like nearly 98.726% of those girls faces have been hit one too many time with a cinder block.

Where was the explicit line that said you cant go to clubs or listen to the music you want. Id like to see the exact quote...not a misinterpretation.