coppertree10

No need for any ugly ass nasty toes from you two freaks. Men's feet are certainly not wanted on this thread. Discussing the finer points of the woman's lowest extremity is great, but no man feet. I'm looking for those ladies whose posts I read all the time and sound so sensual. Must have some who like to dress up a bit in the sack. Let's see/hear it. Sexychick, somebitch, anyone?

I just can't get enough of you fine ladies with your fine toes crammed into those huge, sexy platform shoes. All kinds, all colors. Sex with 'em on is the best. If you've got 'em, snap some photos and post 'em. Or tell us your fav shoe/foot/toe fetish story.

you don't have to proclaim it yourself asshole, I'll do it for you! Hahaha. you really are a dick. fuck off.

Contracts is cake. Just use "commercially reasonable" alot and know your damages formulas. Throw in a little "unjust enrichment" and yada yada yada. I just passed the bar and would love to hear more about finals, and you.

trying to track you down girl. need to hook up and go out one night. diggin' your posts.

stumble on down to Breakbeatscience on Orchard St. in Lower East Side. If you are a break freak, it's your oasis, and will let you know where to go hear jungle. It's 7 ays a week in NYC, that's how us souljas do. Bump.

I need Sexxichikk to respond to me. She sounds so dope!

Gotta meet you girl! Start dreaming about you every time you post. How' bout a drink?

Does this guy ever stop? Go ahead and get the fuck out of NYC already! Enough of your bitching. You were apparently lucky enough to get a gig wherever you were DJing, and didn't have the stuff to keep your job, whether it's because you don't "bring the people" or because you don't "play their music" or whatever reason it is. If you want to be a DJ apparently there are ropes that have to be jumped(as with any job), and apparently you're not willing to jump them (= no promotion at work). So be the fuck out, quit telling us about it, and go do it.

Does this guy ever stop? Go ahead and get the fuck out of NYC already! Enough of your bitching. You were apparently lucky enough to get a gig wherever you were DJing, and didn't have the stuff to keep your job, whether it's because you don't "bring the people" or because you don't "play their music" or whatever reason it is. If you want to be a DJ apparently there are ropes that have to be jumped(as with any job), and apparently you're not willing to jump them (= no promotion at work). So be the fuck out, and quit telling us about and go do it.

Do you really think that things will be better in Cali, or anywhere else in the world for that matter? Naive if you think cats on the Leftcoast aren't using CDs. How could one possibly think that they are not getting DJ gigs because they choose not to use CDs (even though in re: your equipment list, it appears you do)? Regardless, this post doesn't deserve as much attention to this guy's equip., as the "N@#$%!ized" term does. Did we ever get a clarification on this?

what about the fact that DJs use CDR because they have cutting edge tunes on that medium that have not yet pressed to vinyl. If I want my music played out in a club quickly to see crowd reaction, or demoed to a label or A&R person, I'm buring it to CDR and they're hearing it instantly. Kind of like the dubplate is to drumnbass and ragga...feel me?

You'd like to think, though, that maybe "they" also realize that it's just a stupid ass law. No dancing??? Come on, that law dates back to the Jazz Age. Now if we could get them to think about overhauling the Rockefeller Drug Laws.

All of you people call yourself NYC "Clubbers," yet no responses to this monumental news. We should all be celebrating the fact that anyone is even considering lifting the impediment known as the Cabaret license, in light of the Giuliani era. Whatever. Thought that some conversation would be sparked, but this board never ceases to amaze me in terms of how childish it is. All this talk about JP, the Sond Factory and other stupid gossip about DJs none of you really know. Lifting the Cabaret license req will completely change the dance music scene (as well as other forms of music) in our great City. People just don't recognize I guess, or just too uneducated to read a "long post" or the NY Times. Lame ass board.

...makes me want to schedule some alone time -- with the girls, or at least the picture.

From the New York Times, today. I feel my opinion of Bloomberg changing already. All you NYC heads keep hope alive! Decades Old Cabaret Law Faces Repeal By MICHAEL COOPER Published: November 20, 2003 The age-old battle between the New York of nightclubbing revelers and the New York of sleep-deprived neighbors entered a new phase yesterday when the Bloomberg administration said it would move to repeal a Jazz Age law that prohibits dancing in bars and nightclubs that do not hold special licenses. Declaring her intention of putting "the dance police" out of business, Gretchen Dykstra, the commissioner of the city's Department of Consumer Affairs, called for scrapping the old cabaret licenses. In their place, she said, the city should issue new "nightlife licenses" that would allow it to regulate the unwanted side effects of nightlife that people really care about: noise, disorderly crowds and filthy sidewalks. It is the administration's attempt to balance the needs of those who boast that New York is a city that never sleeps, and those who complain about it. The cabaret law was Mayor Jimmy Walker's attempt at that balance in 1926. A city report at the time noted that the law's opponents said that "when strangers came to New York, they wanted to `run wild.' " The report concluded that "there has been altogether too much running wild in some of these nightclubs." The law now requires bars and nightclubs to have a cabaret license, in addition to a liquor license, if their patrons are to dance legally. Businesses say the licenses are not easy to come by. Over the years, the law has been enforced heavily at some points and ignored at others. It became an issue during the Giuliani administration, when the city began using the law as a weapon in its broader crackdown on quality-of-life crimes. Few tears will be shed for the cabaret law if the City Council agrees to repeal it. Stories abound of nightclubs that have switched at a moment's notice from dance music to country or (sorry, Beatles fans) "Eleanor Rigby" to get their patrons to stop gyrating when inspectors arrived. Some disgruntled night owls said New York City was losing its groove and turning into a real-life version of the small town that banned dancing in "Footloose," the Kevin Bacon movie musical. Other revelers were moved to action: they held a "Million Mambo March" to protest the law. Ms. Dykstra announced the proposal to change the law at the Knitting Factory, a downtown nightclub that does not have a cabaret license. "They have to expend resources and energy telling people not to dance," she said. "They don't have any community problems, they don't have violations. But people can't shake their booties when they come to the Knitting Factory. And that strikes us as a little odd." In overhauling the nightlife laws, the administration is hoping to win back the good will of owners and patrons of bars and clubs, some of whom are annoyed by the city's smoking ban. But while the proposed repeal of the dancing ban was greeted ecstatically by some bar owners, other industry representatives expressed concerns about the licensing system that would replace it. The proposal would require clubs to get nightlife licenses if they meet three criteria: they want to be louder than 90 decibels on a continuing basis, they remain open after 1 a.m., and they have a capacity of more than 75 in residential areas or more than 200 in commercial areas. Each bar or club would have to get a professional sound engineer to certify that it has enough soundproofing to comply with the city's noise code. (Ninety decibels, officials said, is louder than a dog barking and quieter than a plane taking off.) And the city would be allowed to revoke the license of any club that is repeatedly caught selling liquor to minors or without a liquor license, or operating without sprinklers, exit signs or emergency lights, or that is the scene of crimes including assault and rape. Christopher Policano, a spokesman for the City Council, said the Council would study the proposed law when it received it. Robert Bookman, a lawyer for the New York Nightlife Association, a trade organization, applauded the city for moving to repeal the cabaret law, but he said he would rather see the city step up its enforcement of existing laws. The association wants a law allowing off-duty police officers to provide security at bars and clubs. To some, the change cannot happen fast enough. At Plant Bar, on Third Street between Avenues B and C, the owner, Dominique Keegan, thought he had a system in place to keep surreptitious dancers safe. The bouncer was supposed to flip a switch if it looked as if inspectors were on their way, turning on a blue light telling the disc jockey to turn off the dance music and put on "Kid A," a less-than-boppy Radiohead album. But the plan fell through in March, when a disc jockey did not know the code and the bar was cited for "16 people dancing." After a second ticket, it was padlocked. To reopen, Mr. Keegan had to discourage dancing, do away with the disc jockeys and put in a jukebox. Since then, he said, business has been way off. Under the proposed law, he would not need a nightlife license because his bar holds fewer than 75 people. The news that dancing could soon be legal, he said, is "music to my ears, if you'll forgive the pun." Word!!! Hope it happens.