jarmenio Posted October 9 Report Share Posted October 9 Who saw it? What's the review? Better then other two parts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cynstam21 Posted October 9 Report Share Posted October 9 Personally, i thought it was awesome, not as good as SOTL, but much more grizzly and sick, sick, sick...Ralph Fiennes did a great job as the psycho, but he is too hot for the role- damn, that once skinny guy just blew up!!!! and Ed Norton shrunk...I saw the first Red Dragon that was made sometime in the 80's and the 2002 version is 1000x better...not as good as the book, I heard, but it never is. GO SEE IT, YOU WON SLEEP AT NIGHT!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tempkid Posted October 9 Report Share Posted October 9 'p-9`2]40ijfc vtfrgtfelpve[pklvb[ewvb\pk[ek1=-evfgqi ij/vgbegbvkv;lbkgngrfnr4tvgtvgt4vgb4bf4evg4vgr4vgr4rvg4rvg4vgr4rv4v4v4rvgbvgftr4gfvg f-e Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barbiegirl Posted October 9 Report Share Posted October 9 i saw it sunday and it was GOOD - silence of the lambs is still the best one of the 3 but this is 2nd best !!!it's worth the $9.50 :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kostaP Posted October 10 Report Share Posted October 10 Originally posted by jarmenio Who saw it? What's the review? Better then other two parts? I JUST GOT BACK AND COULDNT REALIZE WHY I THOUGHT I HAD SEEN IT AGAIN TILL I READ ZEE'S POST.I ENJOYED IT THOUGH IT WAS VERY GOOD. I THINK THE ORIGINAL WAS A LITTLE MORE GRAPHIC AND WITH TOTALLY DIFFERENT LOOKING CHARACTERS BUT OBVIOUSLY THE EFFECTS AND CAMERAWORK WO 100X BETTER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.