Jump to content
Clubplanet Nightlife Community

Ariel Sharon - "A Man of Peace"


djxeno

Recommended Posts

"I don't know something called International Principles. I vow that I'll burn every Palestinian Child will be born in this area. The Palestinian Woman and Child is more dangerous than the Man, Because the Palestinian Child existence refers that Generations will go on, but the man causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an Israeli Civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would make him suffer before killing him. With One hit I've killed 750 Palestinians ( in Rafah, 1956). I wanted to encourage my soldiers by raping Arabic Girls as The Palestinian Woman is a slave for Jews, and we do whatever we want to her and Nobody tells us what we shall do but we tell others what they shall do." -

Ariel Sharon, In an interview with General Ouze Merham, 1956

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you all make me sick. here is proof that sharon is a sick, bloody bastard, yet you continue to make 'towel head' jokes....

obviously, you are all so lost from what is really going on that you choose to remain ignorant of what the truth really is. there are DOZENS of books, publications, and newspaper articles detailing sharon's hatred for arabs and palestinians. read accounts of what happened in the shatila camp in lebanon in 1982. read who was responsible for the attack and who personally massacred dozens of palestinian women. then let's see if you have the fucking nerve to say those 'towel heads' are responsible for it...:blown:

it's been proven already, i guess, that this board is now officially a really shitty one, thanks to you shmucks who don't have the common sense to see issues from both sides instead of resorting to bullshit right away.

yes, now post your useless crap and say i'm guilty of the same thing....i don't expect anything less from anyone in here anymore. :blown::rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by sassa

obviously, you are all so lost from what is really going on that you choose to remain ignorant of what the truth really is. there are DOZENS of books, publications, and newspaper articles detailing sharon's hatred for arabs and palestinians.

funny how you fail to mention the hatres rag heads have towards the israelis.... wouldnt that make the rag heads just as guilty as sharon? yet I dont see you calling those filthy monkeys "sick, bloody bastards"..... funny how YOU only see things from one side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by sassa

read accounts of what happened in the shatila camp in lebanon in 1982. read who was responsible for the attack and who personally massacred dozens of palestinian women.

While I'll agree that Sharon takes a hard stance and has been fighting Muslim Arabs his entire life, I won't let you guys print fake quotes. The quote that started this thread is bullshit.

And, in 1982 Sharon did not massacre anyone @ Shatila. The facts are that the Arab Christians came in and slaughtered the Arab Muslims as pay back for all the Muslim atrocities. I'm not saying what the Christians did was right, but it was just more of the same of the battles that plagued Lebanon before, during and after the Civil War that plagued that country. I love how the Muslims twist the truth to make Sharon part of that mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by sassa

you all make me sick. here is proof that sharon is a sick, bloody bastard, yet you continue to make 'towel head' jokes....

obviously, you are all so lost from what is really going on that you choose to remain ignorant of what the truth really is. there are DOZENS of books, publications, and newspaper articles detailing sharon's hatred for arabs and palestinians. read accounts of what happened in the shatila camp in lebanon in 1982. read who was responsible for the attack and who personally massacred dozens of palestinian women. then let's see if you have the fucking nerve to say those 'towel heads' are responsible for it...:blown:

it's been proven already, i guess, that this board is now officially a really shitty one, thanks to you shmucks who don't have the common sense to see issues from both sides instead of resorting to bullshit right away.

yes, now post your useless crap and say i'm guilty of the same thing....i don't expect anything less from anyone in here anymore. :blown::rolleyes:

You made this board shitty when you posted your theory about lizards ruling the world. I have a question. These hybrid lizards...whose side are they on? Jews or Arabs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by skince55

You made this board shitty when you posted your theory about lizards ruling the world. I have a question. These hybrid lizards...whose side are they on? Jews or Arabs?

Since snakes and lizards are part of the same fam.... then they must be arabs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.mediamonitors.net/amr84.html

War Crimes and Misdemeanors

by Ahmed Amr

The best news in 2001 was that Slobodan Milosovic is finally locked up in a cell in the Hague. Another war criminal, Osama Bin Laden, is facing a similar fate or worst. Now for the bad new. Ariel Sharon is still waltzing around the world stage making plans for his next war crime.

What exactly will it take to bring Sharon to justice? The evidence of his crimes at Qibya and Sabra and Shatila are well documented and a compelling body of evidence has already been filed in a Belgian court. But Sharon has protection from some very powerful American power players in such lofty institutions like The New York Times and The Washington Post. He also has the full backing and support of Rupert Murdoch at FOX and from Levine at CNN and Time/Warner. At ABC, he can depend on Isner. No one loves Israeli war criminals quite like Ted Koppel. Except for Sulzberger’s Thomas Friedman and Charles Krauthammer of the Post.

Since Sharon’s election, the Yiddish supremacists in the American mass media machine have launched a campaign to sanitize his record of serial war crimes. Amazingly enough they have had an unblemished record of success. The same publishers who prided themselves on bringing down tricky Dick accomplished this unbelievable feat. Nixon’s crime was that he lied to the American people about his cover-up of the Watergate break-in. He must be turning in his grave for being hounded out of office for a misdemeanor. And then there is Waldheim, who had to step down as President of Austria because he lied about his service in the German Army. Yet Sharon’s criminal war record somehow escapes the memory of every journalist at the New York Times and The Washington Post. The CNN boys have apparently lost their footage of the carnage at Sabra and Shatila and the indiscriminate bombing of Beirut in 1982. Information on Sharon’s crime at Qibya, where he dynamited a whole village without sparing a single inhabitant, can be easily found in State Department and United Nations archives.

The events of the last year have clearly demonstrated that we now have an American government that is dominated by two forces, The White House and the fourth estate. The Supreme Court has been reduced to reviewing last appeals for those facing capital punishment. As for Congress, it has become a virtual slave of special interest groups. No Senator would dare challenge the Israeli lobby’s blueprint for American policy in the Middle East. Senators like Robert Dole and William Fulbright have been replaced by a class of American politicians that cast every vote depending on the amount of coin deposited in their campaign chests. The end result is that the mass media ‘journalists’ and pundits have more influence on public policy than either Congress or the Supreme Court.

Since the terrorist attacks of 911, the Israeli lobby has hardly been mentioned in either the New York Times or The Washington Post. These two ‘national’ newspapers are virtual pillars of the Israeli Lobby. Yet, somehow they have failed to report to their readers on their very ethnic agendas and how they deliberately tailor news and commentary to accommodate Israeli policies. All the major networks, especially CNN and FOX, scrupulously adhere to this pattern of avoiding the delicate subject of Sharon’s past.

Now why would a group of ‘American’ journalists nail an American president for a misdemeanor and let Sharon totally evade the subject of his war crimes? Why would an American President be reduced to dancing to any tune played on Sharon’s fiddle even after the 911 atrocities? Has George Bush developed an unhealthy paranoia about the power of the Yiddish supremacists?

One would think that there is no better time for an American president to openly discuss whether an ethnic group with vast media assets should be allowed to monopolize the foreign policy debate. Every American of the adult persuasion knows that the Gulf War was a war for oil and Israel. It was the Israeli lobby, which determined every little detail about our Middle Eastern entanglements and even our Balkan policies. The decision to embrace Ariel Sharon was their decision. The decision to place an American Garrison in Saudi Arabia was their way of demonstrating Israel’s influence to the Arabs. It is the Israeli lobby that constantly hounded the administration to tighten the embargo in Iraq which resulted in half-a-million civilian deaths. It is the Israeli Lobby, which now is agitating to have America attack a half a dozen Arab countries on Israel’s hit list.

During the Clinton administration this Lobby moved its operatives into the State Department to the point where virtually every single ‘American’ policy maker assigned to the region was a Yiddish supremacist. Richard Holbrooke was the ambassador to the United Nations. Lawrence Eagleburger was actively involved in allowing Milosovic to hang on to power. Dennis Ross was the ‘American’ mediator who can now be found working in the Lobby. The ‘American’ ambassador to Israel was none other than Martin Indyk, an Australian immigrant who used to head up AIPAC. Indyk is now at the Brookyns Institute doing his chores for Sharon. Daniel Kurzer, the Ambassador to Egypt was an Orthodox Jew. The State Department spokesman, Rubin, is now doing Israeli public relations work at CNN. And, of course, Albright was there to coordinate the ‘All Yiddish’ team. Every single one of these Israeli partisans has warmly embraced Ariel Sharon, without the slightest reservation.

In fact, every single major American Jewish Organization issued statements endorsing the election of Ariel Sharon and they have backed his yearlong campaign to pulverize the Palestinians.

George Bush has an opportunity to really change American fortunes in the Middle East and to give the people of the region a chance to live in peace and prosperity. All he has to do is publicly and openly call for an investigation of the policies that led to 911. At the same time, he must demand that Sharon be investigated and indicted for his war crimes. Sooner or later, the Yiddish supremacists are going to have to deal with this cat when it gets out of the bag. It is a legacy that they can never hope to justify to American media consumers.

No one is suggesting that we silence the Yiddish supremacists. Let the New York Times publish all the canards it sees fit to print. If they start publishing the truth, it will just focus too much attention on their past habits of deception. All that is required is an open debate, with an open agenda, to see how we got ourselves into this miserable mess. Let Palestinian voices be heard, let African-American voices be heard and we must encourage the open participation of the church community. We should feel free to examine the operations of the Israeli Lobby, who finances it, how much money it raises, which Senators are wholly owned and which ones are just on lease to the lobby. Most important, we must encourage Yiddish supremacists to consider adapting more American

Values. We must be blunt in challenging them on their ethnic chauvinism and the need to diversify the ranks of the pundits so that non-Yiddish Americans can also voice their opinions and have career opportunities in the mass media. Finally, we must insist that they abandon their tactics of black listing American journalists and intellectuals who dare to challenge the wisdom of an Israeli government ruled by a criminal thug like Ariel Sharon.

Just another modest agenda for 2002.

Mr. Ahmed Amr is Editor of NileMedia.com in Seattle and a regular contributor to Media Monitors Network (MMN).

Source:

by courtesy & © 2002 Ahmed Amr

by the same author:

USA Must Stand for Palestinian-Americans

Archives: The Achilles Heals of Media Titans

Where Have You been, Mr. President

Media Titans Paint Another Guernica

Unanswered Questions From The Gulf War

Believe Me, Ariel Sharon Knew Nothing

Manufactured Disdain

Elie Wiesel Must Respect Palestinian Memories

More in 'Archive'..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by normalnoises

All he has to do is publicly and openly call for an investigation of the policies that led to 911.

This sentence discredits the entire thing for me. The policies that led to 9/11? This implies that we should accept blame for 9/11. I can't accept that. Terrorism is never justified. Al qada is here for one thing and that is to kill the infidels and we are included in that list. That is some bullshit. Investigate what WE did to bring this on US. Fuck that. More like investigate who did it, where they are and kill them or lock them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by guyman1966

While I'll agree that Sharon takes a hard stance and has been fighting Muslim Arabs his entire life, I won't let you guys print fake quotes. The quote that started this thread is bullshit.

And, in 1982 Sharon did not massacre anyone @ Shatila. The facts are that the Arab Christians came in and slaughtered the Arab Muslims as pay back for all the Muslim atrocities. I'm not saying what the Christians did was right, but it was just more of the same of the battles that plagued Lebanon before, during and after the Civil War that plagued that country. I love how the Muslims twist the truth to make Sharon part of that mix.

:rolleyes:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by skince55

You made this board shitty when you posted your theory about lizards ruling the world. I have a question. These hybrid lizards...whose side are they on? Jews or Arabs?

:rolleyes::laugh: :laugh:

who the hell do you think you are asking me to choose sides? :blown: fuck off...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by skince55

You made this board shitty when you posted your theory about lizards ruling the world. I have a question. These hybrid lizards...whose side are they on? Jews or Arabs?

Originally posted by sassa

:rolleyes::laugh: :laugh:

who the hell do you think you are asking me to choose sides? :blown: fuck off...

By you taking the lizard question personally does that mean you think you really are a hybrid lizard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by skince55

I'm not the one who posted that shit about lizards ruling the world now am I:laugh: :laugh:

it never ends, does it.

you can't even bring up any sort of issue anymore without you assholes jumping down everyone's throat....and how could you even disclaim it? you couldn't. maybe it is, maybe it isn't. just have at least a little respect for yourself to open your mind a bit and see what each side says, regardless of the topic. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by sassa

it never ends, does it.

you can't even bring up any sort of issue anymore without you assholes jumping down everyone's throat....and how could you even disclaim it? you couldn't. maybe it is, maybe it isn't. just have at least a little respect for yourself to open your mind a bit and see what each side says, regardless of the topic. :rolleyes:

No thats fine thank you. I'll keep my mind closed to the lizard theory:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by sassa

and how could you even disclaim it? you couldn't. maybe it is, maybe it isn't. just have at least a little respect for yourself to open your mind a bit and see what each side says, regardless of the topic.

:laugh: ...i find it funny that u want us to be open to such an absurd theory...thats what i find funny...so we should also have open minds about: Peter Pan, Lion King, Little Mermaid and other disney classics?:laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by mrmatas2277

:laugh: ...i find it funny that u want us to be open to such an absurd theory...thats what i find funny...so we should also have open minds about: Peter Pan, Lion King, Little Mermaid and other disney classics?:laugh:

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: lmfao...

You kill me bro :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by mrmatas2277

:laugh: ...i find it funny that u want us to be open to such an absurd theory...thats what i find funny...so we should also have open minds about: Peter Pan, Lion King, Little Mermaid and other disney classics?:laugh:

I think Aladdin would suit her better. You know the whole arab thing and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...