Jump to content
Clubplanet Nightlife Community

NYC proposes closing clubs at 1am - Voice Your OUTRAGE!


Recommended Posts

Gretchen Dykstra, Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs has

made a most outragous proposal that would effectively destroy New York City

nightlife. Please read the attached email below and my response. Please

forward this to anyone you know who loves what New York City nightlife once

was and should continue to be. There is a link below to file a complaint but

if you don't have time, just RSVP with your name as I am putting together

a petition which will be sent to the commissinoer's office.

-----Original Message-----

Sent: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:22:57 -0500

Subject: NYC proposes closing clubs at 1am

Dear friends of NYC music, culture, and hang: There is a new NYC government

proposal that will very seriously effect the ability of live music venues to

stay open for our entertainment. This appeared onpage six of the New York

Post:

January 30, 2004 -- BAR and nightclub owners are in an uproar over a

proposal that would require a "nightlife license" to stay open after 1 a.m.

City Consumer Affairs Commissioner Gretchen Dykstra is pushing a plan that

would require a special two-year license for any nightspot with a capacity

of 75 or more where the music would be 90 decibels or higher. A place would

be padlocked for up to 10 days after three noise or other license

violations.

David Rabin, president of the New York Nightlife Assn. and co-owner of

Lotus, says Dykstra's plan would let the city effectively shut bars and

nightclubs down at 1 a.m. "This bill will end up closing New York at 1

a.m.," Rabin warned. "It's no longer going to be the city that never sleeps.

We're united on this - everyone from the little bars to the biggest

nightclubs. The best-run bar in the universe could not stay open under the

conditions in this proposal."

Please take a moment and go to the link below and send Gretchen Dykstra a

message in regard to this issue:

http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/mail/html/maildca.html

---------

Here is the reply I wrote.... please add your name to the bottom.

Dear Gretchen Dykstra,

Your recent proposal for a "nightlife license" for clubs and bars to stay open after 1 a.m. could easily destroy New York city nightlife and in turn further hurt a struggling economy.

It is difficult to see the logic in this, except the intention to raise revenue for city government by inflicting fines and high fees for these licenses. I would sincerely request that you consider the advantages and disadvantages of such a proposal.

Advantages:

More revenue for the city government by inflicting fines and fees on business owners.

Disadvantages:

Loss of revenue in the form of less taxes due to a dramatic drop in revenue and closings of thousands of small businesses.

Loss of revenue for millions of affected businesses because of a dramatic drop-off in tourism and the money tourist spent in the "city that never sleeps" which would become the sleepy city.

Millions in lost revenue for taxi and car services who drive millions of people home late at night.

Loss of monies generated through future sales of liquor licenses. Who would dream of starting a new night club or bar/restaurant business under those regulations?

Decrease in real estate value as a result of a mass exodus from the sleep ing city.

Increase in crime as a result of over reaching laws.

Personal defaming of those who would support laws which most people would find

reflective of abuse of power.

When you really think about it, and I'm sure you are an intelligent and thoughtful person with the best interests of New York City in mind, is there really any benefit to such proposal? If so, who will ultimately benefit?

If there is something I am missing, I ask you to please explain the point of this proposal and how it will benefit the city at large.

With Sincere Regards,

1. Lance Jordan

2. add your name here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

City will loose $$ if they came to a pause. In reality the city needs $$. Im gonna feel bad when the city is way up to par with funds and see them close and raid all the new spots and shut them down like they did to TWILO, TUNNEL ect ect.

They shoudl just let things be the way it is and open eyes on crime.

Victor Soto

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by bluenova

Gretchen Dykstra, Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs has

made a most outragous proposal that would effectively destroy New York City

nightlife. Please read the attached email below and my response. Please

forward this to anyone you know who loves what New York City nightlife once

was and should continue to be. There is a link below to file a complaint but

if you don't have time, just RSVP with your name as I am putting together

a petition which will be sent to the commissinoer's office.

-----Original Message-----

Sent: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:22:57 -0500

Subject: NYC proposes closing clubs at 1am

Dear friends of NYC music, culture, and hang: There is a new NYC government

proposal that will very seriously effect the ability of live music venues to

stay open for our entertainment. This appeared onpage six of the New York

Post:

January 30, 2004 -- BAR and nightclub owners are in an uproar over a

proposal that would require a "nightlife license" to stay open after 1 a.m.

City Consumer Affairs Commissioner Gretchen Dykstra is pushing a plan that

would require a special two-year license for any nightspot with a capacity

of 75 or more where the music would be 90 decibels or higher. A place would

be padlocked for up to 10 days after three noise or other license

violations.

David Rabin, president of the New York Nightlife Assn. and co-owner of

Lotus, says Dykstra's plan would let the city effectively shut bars and

nightclubs down at 1 a.m. "This bill will end up closing New York at 1

a.m.," Rabin warned. "It's no longer going to be the city that never sleeps.

We're united on this - everyone from the little bars to the biggest

nightclubs. The best-run bar in the universe could not stay open under the

conditions in this proposal."

Please take a moment and go to the link below and send Gretchen Dykstra a

message in regard to this issue:

http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/mail/html/maildca.html

---------

Here is the reply I wrote.... please add your name to the bottom.

Dear Gretchen Dykstra,

Your recent proposal for a "nightlife license" for clubs and bars to stay open after 1 a.m. could easily destroy New York city nightlife and in turn further hurt a struggling economy.

It is difficult to see the logic in this, except the intention to raise revenue for city government by inflicting fines and high fees for these licenses. I would sincerely request that you consider the advantages and disadvantages of such a proposal.

Advantages:

More revenue for the city government by inflicting fines and fees on business owners.

Disadvantages:

Loss of revenue in the form of less taxes due to a dramatic drop in revenue and closings of thousands of small businesses.

Loss of revenue for millions of affected businesses because of a dramatic drop-off in tourism and the money tourist spent in the "city that never sleeps" which would become the sleepy city.

Millions in lost revenue for taxi and car services who drive millions of people home late at night.

Loss of monies generated through future sales of liquor licenses. Who would dream of starting a new night club or bar/restaurant business under those regulations?

Decrease in real estate value as a result of a mass exodus from the sleep ing city.

Increase in crime as a result of over reaching laws.

Personal defaming of those who would support laws which most people would find

reflective of abuse of power.

When you really think about it, and I'm sure you are an intelligent and thoughtful person with the best interests of New York City in mind, is there really any benefit to such proposal? If so, who will ultimately benefit?

If there is something I am missing, I ask you to please explain the point of this proposal and how it will benefit the city at large.

With Sincere Regards,

1. Lance Jordan

2. add your name here

Excellent points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...