Guest JMT Posted September 11 Report Share Posted September 11 http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20041669_20041686_20042607,00.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan2772 Posted September 11 Report Share Posted September 11 couldn't get past the first 3.what a pain in the ass, to put 1 listing per "page"...so you gotta click through 25 pages!i guess that's what gets ads viewed.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest funky monkey Posted September 11 Report Share Posted September 11 I agree with their choices for the most part but not necessarily the order....but no Casino Royal? that was a pretty kick-ass action flick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JMT Posted September 17 Report Share Posted September 17 i agree with #1.they probably didn't want to waste spots on sequels, but i think these classics should have been included:oROYsVyST84 hxFzzcl0VKM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest coach Posted September 17 Report Share Posted September 17 Um, Speed and Gladiator? Someone is sucking someone's dick. 2 of the worst big-budget flicks ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cire Posted September 18 Report Share Posted September 18 The Incredibles would not make my list, good cartoon flick, but that is straight up wasting a spot!What about, Rambo...or replacing Crouching Tiger with Hero (that was better imo). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest xbbdc Posted September 20 Report Share Posted September 20 ive never seen these movies: goldfinger, hard boiled, seven samurai, robin hood from 1938 ????and die hard as # 1 action film??? nay... none of the lord of the rings movies made it, and they had some serious action in it. also missing was movies like braveheart, rambo and pirates of the caribbean or mission impossible...i know its supposed to be greatest of all "time" but not many know the old movies, their should be a start time of like the 60s or 70s to now.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.