unconnected

bitches all of you im goin

you better believe it only white people who dont know any better eat at chinese buffets esp in nyc

best post in thread by far on the actual topic of this thread, i heard draper play once...for about...fifteen minutes...downloaded one of his sets once...didnt stay on my computer very long...and ive only been to exit once...i got frightened...dont plan on going back anytime soon...

wow this explains everything maybe thats why i dont have a gf

dude has issues and amusing that jayp will have a list now

dude surely you could pick someone more interesting than icey to give head for doomer plays every month in ny, i thought she was pretty good

how about "no"?

interesting i got rejected for eagle scout because im an atheist. hahahahaha and gothzane i wont ask where you get tail from in a summer camp full of teenage boys.

hm im not in that pic either

hahahah wrong board sir

check the registration date on the left there

swedish techno dj, lives in ny now? hes played tronic/baktun a lot hes actually really really good but im not going so take that as you will

i cant believe you baited me to reply again. i already said it was a review paper, not a research study. i dont even know why im posting again. you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about go to pubmed or medline (if you even know what that is). pubmed is a search engine run by the national institutes of health, which controls all federal funding for biological and medical research. if you look up mdma or ecstasy youll get 1000+ hits, all from peer-reviewed journals or conferences. there has been a lot of research on mdma, just not nearly enough. try doing your fucking homework before you spout off bullshit about things you dont understand. just because you dont give a fuck about finding out what is there doesnt mean it doesnt exist.

eh sometimes i check up on what you people are doing from time to time. registered a long time ago but they didnt let me have my _ so that was annoying. i like my _. this time i got baited into posting, thats all. dont worry i wont be here long alright back to for me

people can be phenomenally ignorant of the things they have such strong opinions on. the article exists. if you really looked for it how the fuck you didnt find it is beyond me. it is on the personal homepage of one of the authors- hes at university of liverpool in england. its all legit. http://www.liv.ac.uk/Psychology/DeptInfo/StaffProfile/JCole/Sorted_Sep02Cole.pdf it isnt a research study, it is a review paper listing (basically) all the experimental flaws in many of the studies done to date. it does not say ecstasy is harmless, it is suggesting that a lot of the previous studies have severe methodology problems and that some people are drawing conclusions for which the research evidence is really not there. again: they arent saying its harmless. they are casting doubts on the evidence for substantial long-term brain damage with moderate doses. like anything, you have to judge for yourself.