I was wondering why that sounded so confusing - here's the text from the site: "WASHINGTON, DC---On January 28, 2003, President George W. Bush will be the first President of the United States to face significant protest when he makes his second State of the Union address. Through musical performances, speeches, video presentations, and a direct action march, The Shirts Off Coalition will question the sorry state of the union. Additionally, organizers envision a new state of the union—one where all people have access to quality healthcare, shelter, food and education and war is averted by diplomatic relationships." Yes I work for a Democrat. . .but sheesh. Nobody expects the State of the Union to be a harsh look at the real needs of the people with creative new solutions. It's a rebel yell for the administration. Interesting fact: for the last two anti-war-in-Iraq protest marches the President hasn't even been in DC. Nice. . .