daprofessional

Vitali Klitschko, motherfuckers!

after bush wins again in 04, are you gonna keep preaching your racist shit or are you finally go live in the desert with your beloved arab muslims?

aren't you always crying "racist" as a cheap way to win your arguments? what do you call the above statement? fuckin hypocrite.

shut up with all this pacifism shit. Hamas= terrorists. plain and simple. No spiritual leader, they're blood thirsty cocksuckers. the more dead the better. How do you exterminate such a serpent? BUT CUTTING THE FUCKING HEAD OFF! Which is exactly what Israel is doing, god bless em.

fuck the Palestinians How do you talk WITH someone when they're about to detonate?

just a lil tidbit I thought I'd share. Pharrell was at a Rock The Vote rally a little while ago and made a comment, "There's no point in voting because Bush is gonna steal this election like he stole the last one." This is exactly why Celebrities should not get involved in politics. The minute Democrats cut off all ties with them, i'll respect them that much more.

you'd ambush innocent people and mutilate them, tear them limb from limb, burn them alive and hang their bodies on bridge?

U.S. Optimism Is Tested Again After Ambush Kills 4 in Iraq By JOHN F. BURNS Published: April 1, 2004 AGHDAD, Iraq, March 31 — Hours after the deaths of the four American civilians who were dragged from their vehicle and mutilated in Falluja on Wednesday, an American general went before reporters in Baghdad with the air of measured assurance that has characterized every daily briefing on the military situation across Iraq. "Despite an uptick in local engagements, the overall area of operations remains relatively stable with negligible impact on the coalition's ability to continue progress in governance, economic development, and restoration of essential services," said Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, 51, the former paratrooper who is chief spokesman for the United States military command. Nearly a year into the insurgency, the command, in lock step with the civilian administration headed by L. Paul Bremer III, remains relentlessly positive. But along with the publicly expressed confidence, there are hints that American generals are not as sure as they were only weeks ago that they have turned a corner in the conflict. Nor do the scenes from Falluja on Wednesday — Iraqis mutilating American bodies, and crowds cheering at the sight — appear to fit the theory put forward by the American military that Islamic militants, including foreigners, rather than Iraqi supporters of Saddam Hussein, are increasingly behind terrorist attacks. Falluja, 30 miles west of Baghdad, has been the volatile center of support for the toppled dictator, and a bellwether of the wider war. Falluja, relatively quiet in recent months, has become a major battleground again as the First Marine Expeditionary Force, replacing the Army's 82nd Airborne Division, has sent large troop formations into the city to challenge insurgents who had taken control of entire neighborhoods. This reversed the airborne division's policy of leaving security in the city mainly to Iraqi police and civil defense units, and led last week to several pitched battles in which at least three marines and 30 Iraqis died. The visceral hatred for Americans that poured forth on Wednesday suggests that the city remains as much a caldron as it was last April 9, when American troops captured Baghdad. Two weeks after Mr. Hussein's ouster, American troops who had taken over a school as a barracks opened fire on angry crowds, killing 17 Iraqis, after shots were fired at the school. The incident set off attacks that by midsummer had engulfed the entire Sunni Triangle, a strategic area of hundreds of square miles in central Iraq, north, south and west of Baghdad. By February, American generals had begun to say that the worst of the "Saddamist" insurgency was over, its power blunted by a wide American offensive that followed the former dictator's capture on Dec. 13. The American strikes across the Sunni Triangle, they said, had relied heavily on information about the cell structure of the insurgent leadership that was found among the documents seized with Mr. Hussein. Penetrating that, the American officers said, had allowed them to disrupt attacks severely, putting the rebels at a disadvantage. At the same time, senior officers around Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, the American commander, said that Hussein loyalists were increasingly being replaced as America's principal enemy in Iraq by Islamic terrorists with at least loose links to Al Qaeda. On Feb. 8, United States officials produced a document that became known as the "Zarqawi letter." In this, they said, a man they believed to be responsible for several major attacks, including the August bombing of the United Nations headquarters in Baghdad, which killed 22 people, had urged Qaeda leaders to support further attacks aimed at provoking a civil war in Iraq — and halting American progress toward the establishment of a Western-style democratic state. Questions remain about the letter, including whether the writer really was Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a Jordanian-born Islamic militant. But it provided the Americans with a ready-made template for their new interpretation of the war. They said the letter, found on a computer disk carried by a Qaeda-linked courier, was proof that the conflict in Iraq had been transformed from a battle to restore Mr. Hussein into a regional theater for the worldwide war against terrorism. Mr. Zarqawi's photograph was posted in operations centers at American bases across Iraq, and soldiers in their Humvees began cursing Mr. Zarqawi more than Mr. Hussein. Virtually every briefing for reporters tied developments in the war to the growing role of the Islamic militants and the receding threat from what military jargon calls F.R.E.'s, or former regime elements. In urging this view, American generals and senior officials around Mr. Bremer, chief of the occupation authority, have struggled to explain elements of the situation that have seemed not quite to fit their theory. While blaming Islamic militants for many of the worst suicide bombings, including the attacks in Baghdad and Karbala in early March that killed at least 190 people, they have not been able to provide strong evidence that the Islamists, and not supporters of Mr. Hussein, were responsible. One senior official who blamed Mr. Zarqawi for the Baghdad and Karbala bombings told reporters that the F.B.I. had matched ball bearings used in the suicide belts with those used in two January bombings in the northern city of Erbil that killed more than 100 people. But he conceded that ball bearings are sufficiently alike that they lack a conclusive forensic signature — and that a matchup of the shrapnel would prove only that the two attacks might have had a common organizer, not necessarily that the perpetrator was Mr. Zarqawi, and not even that the attackers were Islamic militants, rather than followers of Mr. Hussein. Another problem for those who contend that Islamic terrorists with Qaeda links now pose the main threat to American forces is that only a small number of the 12,000 detainees currently held at American-run camps across Iraq are foreigners from the swath of Muslim countries across Asia, the Middle East and Africa who have been the principal activists of Al Qaeda and its associated groups elsewhere. American officials have said that fewer than 150 of the detainees are foreigners, the rest Iraqis. The United States command has occasionally announced the arrest of a suspected Islamic terrorist, but has then fallen silent. On Tuesday, before the Falluja attacks, General Kimmitt, the American military spokesman, appeared to back off at least somewhat from the emphasis on Islamic militants as the principal enemy. At a briefing, he offered an overview of the war in which he suggested that what has occurred, in effect, is a merging of the Saddamist insurgents and the Islamic terrorists into a common terrorist threat, and that, either way, "we just call them targets." Several Iraqis interviewed on Wednesday, including middle-class professionals, merchants and former members of Mr. Hussein's army, suggested that that the United States might be facing a war in which the common bonds of Iraqi nationalism and Arab sensibility have transcended other differences, fostering a war of national resistance that could pose still greater challenges to the Americans in the months, and perhaps years, ahead. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/01/i...ast/01ASSE.html

all of you shut the fuck up, g420 is absolutely right

Amadeus had nothing to do with it (He was probably still in Rhode Island.) Benny Maze made that shit years ago and JP bought it off him to release through deeper.

because the statement speaks for itself and doesn't need a comment. And don't get me wrong, I'm not that naive to believe that every single muslim in the world is evil, but a LOT are. I don't know why but that society needs a major reformation and FAST. Don't give me any bullshit about them the them being victims and only struggling to survive but murdering innocent people in such horrid ways is not justifiable,(and don't tell me that they're being tenacious and the Jews are doing the same thing, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT!) I wasn't born yesterday and I won't drink the spiked kool-aid like all you liberal idiots. Change should come from within and the muslim culture (as varied as they may be from region to region) need to change, and thats a cold hard fact.

is the 12 minute one better than the 6:15? cause this 6:15 one isn't that hot.

shut the fuck up. why don't you actually post something meaningful instead of this tripe. Why do you surmise that someone is hateful because they have convictions that they can back up with evidence? it's not hate, it's being realistic.

great article as always igloo, I wonder if any of these liberal thinking delusional posters on this board have thought about this insightful article rationally, or if they just brushed it off without a second thought. Do they really prefer to get their information from halfwitted celebrites(who should selflessly keep their asine opinions from out of the public spectrum) or are they just brainwashed?

read my post again you ignorant fuck, he DOESN'T SUPPORT IT BECAUSE THEY PROMISED RETALIATION IF HE DOES! Why would Bush want to inspire someone like djexno to blow himself up and kill scores of innocents (duplicating what goes on Israel) if it can be avoided by simply not supporting this assassination (even though you can rest assured that hes congratulating Sharon behind closed doors)?

you stupid fuck, he never condemned the killing he just "criticized" it because Hamas and the rest of the "repressed homocidal stone age clerics" have vowed retaliation against the United States. It's a political move. good riddance yassin is dead he was a fucking terrorist why are people denying that? Israel has been trying for peace for decades now, and fuckin hypocrites like the U.N. and Canada decry that the peace effort is stagnant NOW? what peace effort?! they'll be blowing themselves up in discos and buses even when they're appeased

they found the weapons of mass destruction, there's almost a billion of em out there, they're called muslims

actually, i dunno about all that. If the Dems ran a Kerry/Edwards ballot or a Edwards/Kerry, it might be interesting. They're not too radical.

I never understood why people vehemently hate Sharpton so much. Ok so he protests alot and is outspoke with strong opinions but other than that, what's the beef?

you're utterly lost. I thought you were capable of a coherent discussion but I see there is absolutely no hope for you anymore. Go on run your mouth about homosexual fantasies and keep alluding to nazism. Enjoy yourself, I'll just be content with my knowledge that you have wasted your life and that you are nothing in this world but a delusional hollow shell of a man.

you sound like a rambling homeless nutjob. Don't you usually chill by Grand Central with a sign? Is it too cold so you got on a computer in the library to babble? And i think I saw your little speech in a movie. It was about some kid who is trying to find a girl he met during a blackout in a stalled elavator, it was called 100 girls or something like that. Bad movie and bad point. You sound like a fucking idiot giving an uninspiring speech that was taken from a b movie.

I'm new to the board so I'm not sure if this was discussed. I am bewildered about these laws. I can understand if they were passed as an idealistic solution to ending the robust illegal market for drugs but IT DOESN'T WORK. Child rapists and attempted murderers get less incarceration time than small time drug dealers. Im not talking metric tons here, OUNCES GET YOU DECADES IN PRISON while violent crimes get you much more miniscule ones in comparison. I'm curious why the lobbying groups in favor of abolishing this crap aren't being taken seriously. Does anyone here actually agree with Nelson's Rockefeller's laws?

the fact that he got our city out of debt makes up for it. Yeah the club usually has a door to the outside for smokers or the you can always smoke in the vip room. noone bothers you there.

i'm sure you were one of the people constantly censuring him. He turned this city around. It took people 8 years to realize that about him. After 9/11 they finally came around. The same goes for Bloomberg who I hated as well but the results are there crystal clear, he got our city out of debt. THE SAME GOES FOR BUSH.

I'm young and in college. I was left wing for a while. It was the idealism and feeling of fighting for justice that excited me about some of the left wing extremists. But then I actually listened and spoke with men and women who are older and more experienced than me. I actually read the newspaper with an open mind (The Times no less) instead of have a predisposition of "Bush is Evil". I realized that Republicans may be shady and the money they have is dirty but that doesnt take away from the fact that they do want whats best for the country, they get things done and they dont pander to the masses for votes, they stick to their beliefs. It's respectable.