destruction

The words of a person who is getting owned are located above this reply ladies and gentlemen. Try addressing his points instead of lowering yourself to personal attacks. It will make you sound more like an intellectual. You are only proving him right by enforcing your own ignorance and you are showing you have nothing to defend your stand with, in other words, your own lack of credibility as well as a self-display of your both your own intellectual ineptness as well as a self-display of your immaturity. Does that make you proud?

Police forcibly tackling elderly, confiscating firearms and dragging them out of their homes FOX News | September 12 2005 So-called conservative O'Reilly lauds it as cops force their way into homes and aprehend dangerous insurgent old women. http://www.infowars.com/articles/new_orleans/gun_grab_police_force_elderly_out_of_homes.htm FLASHBACK: New Orleans Court Opens Door To Searches Without Warrants WDSU | March 29, 2004 http://www.wdsu.com/news/2953483/detail.html NEW ORLEANS -- It's a groundbreaking court decision that legal experts say will affect everyone: Police officers in Louisiana no longer need a search or arrest warrant to conduct a brief search of your home or business. Leaders in law enforcement say it will keep officers safe, but others argue it's a privilege that could be abused. The decision in United States v. Kelly Gould, No. 0230629cr0, was made March 24 by the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed in Denham Springs in 2000, in which defendant Gould filed a motion to suppress information gleaned from a search of his home. The motion was granted by district court, and the government appealed this decision. The March 24 ruling by the 5th Circuit is an affirmation of that appeal. Searches Without Warrants Agree With Ruling? Discuss This Topic Read The Opinion (Adobe Acrobat Required) In the case, the Livingston Parish Sheriff's Office was contacted on Oct. 17, 2000, by a Gould employee who told officers that Gould intended to kill two judges and unidentified police officers and to destroy telephone company transformers. The LPSO informed the East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office of the threats. A search of Gould's criminal history revealed several arrests and that he was "a convicted felon for violent charges," according to the Facts and Proceedings section of the 5th Circuit ruling. When officers went to question Gould, they were told he was asleep. The officers asked if they could look inside for Gould, and were allowed to enter. The officers testified that that they believed a search of the home was necessary to ensure their safety, given the allegations by Gould's employee and Gould's criminal history, according to the Facts and Proceedings section of the 5th Circuit ruling. Gould's bedroom door was ajar, and officers testified they peered inside and saw no one. Thinking Gould could be hiding, the officers looked in three closets. In one of the closets, the officers found three firearms, according to the Facts and Proceedings section of the 5th Circuit ruling. Gould was found hiding outside the home a few minutes later. He was taken into custody and questioned about the guns. The officers asked for and received Gould's consent to search the home, with Gould signing a waiver of search warrant. Gould subsequently was arrested for allegedly being a felon in possession of firearms. One judge, Judge Grady Jolly, said he concurred in part and dissented in part with the majority opinion. Judge Jerry Smith, however, completely disagreed with the majority ruling, saying: "I have no doubt that the deputy sheriffs believed that they were acting reasonably and with good intentions. But the old adage warns us that 'the road to hell is paved with good intentions.'" New Orleans Police Department spokesman Capt. Marlon Defillo said the new search power, which is effective immediately, will be used judiciously. "We have to have a legitimate problem to be there in the first place, and if we don't, we can't conduct the search," Defillo said. But former U.S. Attorney Julian Murray said the ruling is problematic. "I think it goes way too far," Murray said, noting that the searches can be performed if an officer fears for his safety. Defillo said he doesn't envision any problems in New Orleans. "There are checks and balances to make sure the criminal justice system works in an effective manner," Defillo said. E-MAIL THIS LINK Enter recipient's e-mail:

To All My Fellow Americans Who Voted for George W. Bush: On this, the fourth anniversary of 9/11, I'm just curious, how does it feel? How does it feel to know that the man you elected to lead us after we were attacked went ahead and put a guy in charge of FEMA whose main qualification was that he ran horse shows? That's right. Horse shows. I really want to know -- and I ask you this in all sincerity and with all due respect -- how do you feel about the utter contempt Mr. Bush has shown for your safety? C'mon, give me just a moment of honesty. Don't start ranting on about how this disaster in New Orleans was the fault of one of the poorest cities in America. Put aside your hatred of Democrats and liberals and anyone with the last name of Clinton. Just look me in the eye and tell me our President did the right thing after 9/11 by naming a horse show runner as the top man to protect us in case of an emergency or catastrophe. I want you to put aside your self-affixed label of Republican/conservative/born-again/capitalist/ditto-head/right-winger and just talk to me as an American, on the common ground we both call America. Are we safer now than before 9/11? When you learn that behind the horse show runner, the #2 and #3 men in charge of emergency preparedness have zero experience in emergency preparedness, do you think we are safer? When you look at Michael Chertoff, the head of Homeland Security, a man with little experience in national security, do you feel secure? When men who never served in the military and have never seen young men die in battle send our young people off to war, do you think they know how to conduct a war? Do they know what it means to have your legs blown off for a threat that was never there? Do you really believe that turning over important government services to private corporations has resulted in better services for the people? Why do you hate our federal government so much? You have voted for politicians for the past 25 years whose main goal has been to de-fund the federal government. Do you think that cutting federal programs like FEMA and the Army Corps of Engineers has been good or bad for America? GOOD OR BAD? With the nation's debt at an all-time high, do you think tax cuts for the rich are still a good idea? Will you give yours back so hundreds of thousands of homeless in New Orleans can have a home? Do you believe in Jesus? Really? Didn't he say that we would be judged by how we treat the least among us? Hurricane Katrina came in and blew off the facade that we were a nation with liberty and justice for all. The wind howled and the water rose and what was revealed was that the poor in America shall be left to suffer and die while the President of the United States fiddles and tells them to eat cake. That's not a joke. The day the hurricane hit and the levees broke, Mr. Bush, John McCain and their rich pals were stuffing themselves with cake. A full day after the levees broke (the same levees whose repair funding he had cut), Mr. Bush was playing a guitar some country singer gave him. All this while New Orleans sank under water. It would take ANOTHER day before the President would do a flyover in his jumbo jet, peeking out the widow at the misery 2500 feet below him as he flew back to his second home in DC. It would then be TWO MORE DAYS before a trickle of federal aid and troops would arrive. This was no seven minutes in a sitting trance while children read "My Pet Goat" to him. This was FOUR DAYS of doing nothing other than saying "Brownie (FEMA director Michael Brown), you're doing a heck of a job!" My Republican friends, does it bother you that we are the laughing stock of the world? And on this sacred day of remembrance, do you think we honor or shame those who died on 9/11/01? If we learned nothing and find ourselves today every bit as vulnerable and unprepared as we were on that bright sunny morning, then did the 3,000 die in vain? Our vulnerability is not just about dealing with terrorists or natural disasters. We are vulnerable and unsafe because we allow one in eight Americans to live in horrible poverty. We accept an education system where one in six children never graduate and most of those who do can't string a coherent sentence together. The middle class can't pay the mortgage or the hospital bills and 45 million have no health coverage whatsoever. Are we safe? Do you really feel safe? You can only move so far out and build so many gated communities before the fruit of what you've sown will be crashing through your walls and demanding retribution. Do you really want to wait until that happens? Or is it your hope that if they are left alone long enough to soil themselves and shoot themselves and drown in the filth that fills the street that maybe the problem will somehow go away? I know you know better. You gave the country and the world a man who wasn't up for the job and all he does is hire people who aren't up for the job. You did this to us, to the world, to the people of New Orleans. Please fix it. Bush is yours. And you know, for our peace and safety and security, this has to be fixed. What do you propose? I have an idea, and it isn't a horse show. Yours, Michael Moore www.michaelmoore.com mmflint@aol.com

Translation: PS. I'm not black. I'm a cracker and "monkey" in the area of your description is a racist sentiment. You just admitted you are a racist. Way to go fool. Translation:

Don't judge. You are turning a blind eye to their own sin and their own failure to follow the Bible. Anyhow.... Did I say I intended to use your own words against you? The last time I checked, yeah. I am true to my intentions. Pride? I take pride in what I do. Exactly! NYC must have a small neighborhood called "Little Dumbfuckistan" and igloo is its' resident idiot.

FEMA fuck ups FEMA Won't Accept Amtrak's Help In Evacuations FEMA Turns Away Experienced Firefighters FEMA Turns Back Wal-Mart Supply Trucks FEMA Prevents Coast Guard From Delivering Diesel Fuel FEMA Won't Let Red Cross Deliver Food FEMA Bars Morticians From Entering New Orleans FEMA Blocks 500-Boat Citizen Flotilla From Delivering Aid FEMA Fails To Utilize Navy Ship With 600-Bed Hospital On Board FEMA to Chicago: Send Just One Truck FEMA Turns Away Generators FEMA: "First Responders Urged Not To Respond" FEMA flies evacuees to the wrong Charleston

Translation:

..................

Translation:

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. - A federal judge lifted a gag order Friday that shielded the identity of librarians who received an FBI demand for records about library patrons under the Patriot Act. U.S. District Court Judge Janet Hall ruled in favor of the American Civil Liberties Union, which argued that the gag order prevented their client from participating in a debate over whether Congress should reauthorize the Patriot Act. “It’s fabulous,†said ACLU Associate Legal Director Ann Beeson. “Clearly the judge recognized it was profoundly undemocratic to gag a librarian from participating in the Patriot Act debate.†The ruling would allow the ACLU and its client to identify who received the request for records, but Hall stayed her decision until Sept. 20 to give the government a chance to appeal. Prosecutors said they were reviewing the decision and considering an appeal. Prosecutors argue that the gag order blocked the release of the client’s identity, not the client’s ability to speak about the Patriot Act. They said revealing the client’s identity could tip off suspects and jeopardize a federal investigation into terrorism or spying. ‘Practical effect of silencing individuals’ Hall rejected the argument that the gag order didn’t silence the client. “The government may intend the non-disclosure provision to serve some purpose other than the suppression of speech,†Hall wrote. “Nevertheless, it has the practical effect of silencing individuals with a constitutionally protected interest in speech and whose voices are particularly important in an ongoing national debate about the intrusion of governmental authority into individual lives.†The ruling rejected the gag order in this case, but it did not strike down the provision of the law used by the FBI to demand the library records. A broader challenge to that provision is still pending before Hall. What is known about the FBI request is that on an undisclosed date, the FBI delivered what is known as a National Security Letter to the ACLU’s client, which maintains traditional library book records as well as records on Internet use by its patrons. The letter demanded “any and all subscriber information, billing information and access logs of any person or entity related to†something or someone whose name is blacked out in the publicly released version of the letter. The letter said the information is relevant to an investigation of terrorism or spying. Prosecutors fear tipping off terrorism suspects Federal prosecutors say that identifying recipients of such letters would allow targets of investigations to flee or provide misinformation. The Patriot Act, passed shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, allowed expanded surveillance of terrorism suspects, increased use of material witness warrants to hold suspects incommunicado and secret proceedings in immigration cases. More than a dozen provisions of the act are set to expire at the end of this year. Liberals and libertarian-oriented conservatives have pressed for changes, citing privacy and civil liberties concerns. Hall also expressed concerns about the act, writing: “The potential for abuse is written into the statute: the very people who might have information regarding investigative abuses and overreaching are preemptively prevented from sharing that information with the public and with the legislators who empower the executive branch with the tools used to investigate matters of national security.†http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9274004/ owned!

Translation: Try one that's not as tight fitting next time and stay out of your sister's drawers! You don't give a fuck about people of New Orleans, you certainly don't give a fuck about the fact that your "President Bush Is The Greatest Person Alive" garbage is intellectually and morally bankrupt, you most definitely do not give a fuck that this type of bullshit is EXACTLY what terrorists count on, and you especially do not give a fuck about the troops in harms way......and you really don't give a fuck about the military moms whose kids have been MURDERED on the count of his lies nor do you care about their kids.. You support the war only to support Bush and dishonor the troops and their families and you don't give a fuck about this country. Your goal is pro-Bush, and to damage America....period. You can cloak yourself under false "patriotism" all you want, but that is not even remotely close what you are doing.....and you are fooling no one. You do not offer true support for America, you do not offer informed views, you do not offer intellectual, practical alternatives........you offer nothing but words that embolden those lined against America, and provide confidence to those that count on useful idiots like yourself to wilt away the resolve of the country to get through a tough challenge or do something positive to tackle those tough challanges. Take the negatives and turn them into positives. And just as repulsive, you really do not root for America, instead you long for the doom and gloom, and if it is not there, reach for anything and elevate it to absurd levels. You are a disgrace and a fraud. You are dumb, and your transparent anti-Americanism is fooling no one. You cloak yourself in this bullshit to give your pathetic, useless, empty life a false sense of meaning, but at the end of the day, you are nothing. An insignificant piece of shit that offers and contributes nothing. Nothing.

New Orleans Begins Confiscating Firearms as Water Recedes By ALEX BERENSON and TIMOTHY WILLIAMS Published: September 8, 2005 NEW ORLEANS, Sept. 8 - Waters were receding across this flood-beaten city today as police officers began confiscating weapons, including legally registered firearms, from civilians in preparation for a mass forced evacuation of the residents still living here. Police officers looking for survivors today in the Ninth Ward of New Orleans. No civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns or other firearms, said P. Edwin Compass III, the superintendent of police. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said. But that order apparently does not apply to hundreds of security guards hired by businesses and some wealthy individuals to protect property. The guards, employees of private security companies like Blackwater, openly carry M-16's and other assault rifles. Mr. Compass said that he was aware of the private guards, but that the police had no plans to make them give up their weapons. Nearly two weeks after the floods began, New Orleans has turned into an armed camp, patrolled by thousands of local, state, and federal law enforcement officers, as well as National Guard troops and active-duty soldiers. While armed looters roamed unchecked last week, the city is now calm. No arrests were made on Wednesday night or this morning, and the police received only 10 calls for service, a police spokesman said. The city's slow recovery is continuing on other fronts as well, local officials said at a news conference. Pumping stations are now operating across much of the city, and many taps and fire hydrants have water pressure. Tests have shown no evidence of cholera or other dangerous diseases in flooded areas, though health officials have said the waters contain unsafe levels of E. coli bacteria and lead. Efforts to recover corpses have also started. But there were still signs of confusion and uncertainty over government plans. FEMA's director, Michael D. Brown, had said his agency would begin issuing debit cards, worth at least $2,000 each, to allow hurricane victims to buy supplies for immediate needs. More than 319,000 people have already applied for federal disaster relief, and many evacuees began lining up at the Astrodome, in Houston, early today in hope of getting cards. "The concept is to get them some cash in hand," Mr. Brown had said, "which allows them, empowers them, to make their own decisions about what they need to have to restart their lives." But this afternoon, FEMA announced that it no longer planned to issue the cards. An agency spokesman, David G. Passey, said that he did not know why the program was scrapped but that now "we believe that our normal methods of delivery - checks and electronic funds transfer - will suffice." In Washington, the House an Senate overwhelmingly approved $51.8 billion for relief efforts, the second disbursement since the storm devastated the Gulf Coast on Aug. 29. The funds include $50 billion for FEMA, $1.4 billion for the Department of Defense and an additional $400 million for the Army Corps of Engineers. The request follows a $10.5 billion package that President Bush signed on Friday and that is intended to address the immediate needs of survivors. Hundreds of miles to the east, Ophelia, a tropical storm off the Florida coast, was upgraded to hurricane status this afternoon after its winds reached speeds of 75 miles per hour. Forecasters have predicted that Ophelia will turn east into the Atlantic Ocean during the next few days, although its path remains unclear. With pumps running and the weather here remaining hot and dry, water has receded across much of New Orleans. Formerly flooded streets are now passable, although covered with leaves, tree branches and mud. A spokesman for the Army Corps of Engineers, Dan Hitchings, said 37 of the city's 174 permanent pumps were working this afternoon, removing about 11,000 cubic feet of flood water per second. The city's 174 pumps have the capacity to remove about 81,000 cubic feet of water each second when they are all operational. While Mr. Hitchings would not try to quantify how much the water level in the city had dropped, he did say that "it's going down." The Army Corps of Engineers continues to try to plug two levee breaks, Mr. Hitchings said, on London Avenue, and at the end of the Harbor Navigation Canal. Alex Berenson reported from New Orleans for this article, and Timothy Williams from New York. Reporting was contributed by John Broder from New Orleans, Sewell Chan from Baton Rouge, La; Christine Hauser from New York, and Matthew L. Wald from Vicksburg, Miss. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/08/national/nationalspecial/08cnd-storm.html

Translation: Please try to justify your belief that America is the best country. You really don't care about America's infrastructure, do you?

What a fucking dunce. He really don't give a fuck about the hurricane victims, doesn't he.

http://www.selltheranch.com

FEMA Won't Accept Amtrak's Help In Evacuations FEMA Turns Away Experienced Firefighters FEMA Turns Back Wal-Mart Supply Trucks FEMA Prevents Coast Guard From Delivering Diesel Fuel FEMA Won't Let Red Cross Deliver Food FEMA Bars Morticians From Entering New Orleans FEMA Blocks 500-Boat Citizen Flotilla From Delivering Aid FEMA Fails To Utilize Navy Ship With 600-Bed Hospital On Board FEMA to Chicago: Send Just One Truck FEMA Turns Away Generators FEMA: "First Responders Urged Not To Respond" FEMA flies evacuees to the wrong Charleston This is an appalling list.

Proper grammar makes one look more intelligent. If only he could troll intelligently..... Are u late for Sesame Street??

Bingo!!

No shit. He's too dumb to even know how to play. I bet he doesn't know what chord he is playing, even after Mark Wills showed him. It's a G chord, open position George!!! And you're holding it on the 4th fret!!! The root is on the third fucking fret you idiot!!! Comprende?

Translation: First of all, Capitalize the first letter of the first word in a sentence. Second, PUNCUATION is necessary, in this case, use periods at the end of your sentences. Also, it's "comprende", not "comprede". Learn to spell and use once again PUNCTUATION, in this case, a question mark. Apparently you're having one (period). Word of advice: Comprende?

Nate's coming for you! Miami is next! Can you swim??

Don't be making fun of igloo's photo of him racing in the special olympics. Here's a fresh battery for your talking blow up fuck doll. Enjoy.

Your intelligence is having a meltdown. Articulate are you???

Is G the only chord he knows? Oh wait..... He can't play. Apparently, that's the only chord Country Singer Mark Wills showed him for the photo op of him after he gave it to him. Now Bush thinks he knows how to play?? HA!! I can play circles around him! What an embarassment he is!!

Fed Response to Katrina Gets Thumbs Down September 4, 2005--Just 28% of Americans give say that the federal government has done a good or an excellent job responding to Hurricane Katrina. Another 25% say the government has done a fair job while 45% say poor. Interest in the story is extraordinarily high. Eighty-eight percent (88%) of Americans say they are closely following news stories about the tragedy, including 59% who are following it "very closely." Forty-seven percent (47%) have made a financial contribution to help the victims of the disaster. Seventy-eight percent (78%) have said a prayer for them. Eighty-five percent (85%) say that the "disaster in New Orleans and surrounding areas [will] have a major impact on the U.S. economy. Consumer confidence has fallen to its lowest level in more than two years. Even among Republicans, there are significant doubts about the federal response to Katrina. Just 47% of those in President Bush's party say the federal response has been good or excellent. Fifty-one percent say fair or poor. In terms of supporting the victims with financial contribution and/or prayer, there is little partisan difference. Demographic details available for Premium Members. Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information. Rasmussen Reports was the nation's most accurate polling firm during the Presidential election and the only one to project both Bush and Kerry's vote total within half a percentage point of the actual outcome. During Election 2004, RasmussenReports.com was also the top-ranked public opinion research site on the web. We had twice as many visitors as our nearest competitor and nearly as many as all competitors combined. Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade. To keep up with our latest releases, be sure to visit the Rasmussen Reports Home Page. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2005/Katrina.htm