sassa Posted June 18 Report Share Posted June 18 Where did the feisty Americans go?It will be a question historians will debate perhaps for centuries to come.How did a president remain solidly popular with the American people, eventhough: The economy stagnated during his watch;He turned a projected federal surplus of $5.7 trillion over the nextinto a projected $2 trillion deficit, fueled by huge tax cuts thatenriched the wealthy and failed to stimulate the economy;He proposed and won more tax cuts, though most economists warned thatthey wouldn't likely create many jobs;His administration trimmed basic domestic civil rights, including theright to privacy, counsel and habeas corpus;He openly scorned relations with traditional allies and potentialfriends worldwide;He launched a war against a sovereign nation without establishing whyit was urgent and necessary, and without achieving any of his stated goalsfor attacking, except regime change;The company once headed by his vice president landed a no-bid contractin Iraq far more lucrative than originally revealed?There has never been anything like this in American political history.Despite a record of budget irresponsibility, international discord,warmongering and even scandal, the Bush veneer is hardly scuffed.It isn't anything about Bush; it's about us. We've changed, and not for thebetter.It seems only yesterday that the typical American took a delicious pride inholding the feet of political leaders -- even the ones we admired -- to thefire. Whether it was Nixon or Carter or Reagan or Clinton, presidents havehad to endure the relentless heat of popular scrutiny. Until now.Bush exists in a dimension far beyond having to fend off criticism. It's asif critical evaluation itself has gone into hibernation. Virtually nobodyquestions Bush -- not the opposition Democrats, not the bulk of the media,and by all reckoning, not the public.There can be only one explanation: Sept. 11. That terrible day in 2001transformed us in many ways, but the most subtle and insidious change washow it sapped our national confidence.The terrorist attacks provoked in us not courage, but fear -- fear of beingvictimized again, as we were that day. We've reacted like the rape victimwhose faith in human nature is crushed by anxiety and suspicion, ratherthan the one who fights back spiritually, refusing to be degraded by adegrading act.Bush told us that we needed to attack Iraq for our security, and weaccepted it. He told us that we needed to compromise certain civil rightsto help catch terrorists, and we accepted it. He told us that our securityrequired us to detain suspects without charges or access to lawyers, and weaccepted it.It's as if the American people, shivering with fear, are huddling aroundBush as if he were a shepherd. Do whatever you must, dear shepherd; justprotect us. Consequently:We won't even question economic policies that have created a weakdollar, a soft stock market and creeping unemployment.We won't explore the logic of disarming the newly freed Iraqi people,while backing a resumption of sales of assault-style weapons at home.We won't evaluate the ludicrous notion that Haitian asylum seekersmust be imprisoned as a matter of national security, even as migrants fromcommunist Cuba are allowed to swim ashore and go free.When I press Bush supporters on his record, they invariably respond withgeneral references to faith and trust: He has good reasons for what he hasdone. Time will prove him right. He's a good man.That's no America I recognize. Some amount of faith is fine and healthy.But aren't we Americans supposed to be feisty, indomitable, demanding,assertive, skeptical?Sept. 11 rightly made us more cautious and more vigilant. But it alsodiminished us. We're less tolerant of dissent; less thoughtful about worldissues; less concerned with principles of justice, fairness and equity; and-- to the apparent benefit of Bush's poll numbers -- less demanding of ourpolitical leaders.It made us intellectually passive -- which frightens me much more than ahijacked airliner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
igloo Posted June 18 Report Share Posted June 18 :laugh: :lol3: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassa Posted June 18 Author Report Share Posted June 18 laughing at the facts? i figured. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skince55 Posted June 19 Report Share Posted June 19 So many holes in your sermon...I dont even know where to startThe economy stagnated during his watch;He turned a projected federal surplus of $5.7 trillion over the nextinto a projected $2 trillion deficit, fueled by huge tax cuts thatenriched the wealthy and failed to stimulate the economy;Enron...WorldCom....9/11....technology bubble popping. None of those things had to do with our current economy??? Honestly...were any of these things Bush's fault??Why don't you give the tax cuts a chance to fail before you blame them for the economy?? His most recent cuts have not had time to impact the economy yet. His administration trimmed basic domestic civil rights, including the right to privacy, counsel and habeas corpus;Has our nation ever experienced a threat similar to the one we are experiencing today?? Right, thats what I thought. So until you come up with a better solution...please do not comment on this. He openly scorned relations with traditional allies and potential friends worldwide;As they had done to us. They openely opposed our stance on Iraq, which removed any teeth the United Nations had as an eforcement body in the world. Iraq repeatedly violated UN resolutions and they wanted to give it more time. What were they waiting for? All of Manahattan's population to be murdered by a chemical agent?He launched a war against a sovereign nation without establishing why it was urgent and necessary, and without achieving any of his stated goals for attacking, except regime change;First replace "sovereign nation" with "terrorist sponsoring nation"(and don't say they are not because the families of palestinian suicide bombers were recieving money from saddam). Second he did establish why it was urgent and necessary. Example...Iraq was unable to account for certain aspects of their wmd programs. We live in a different world today with new threats. I applaud Bush for not sitting back and waiting for some terrorist to walk into NYC with a liter of Iraq produced sarin and wipe out the entire city. (thats right only 1 liter...very easy to conceal...especially in a country the size of California)There has never been anything like this in American political history. Despite a record of budget irresponsibility, international discord,warmongering and even scandal, the Bush veneer is hardly scuffed. It isn't anything about Bush; it's about us. We've changed, and not for the better.Your right about one thing here. America has never experienced anything like this. We were never had a terrorist attack of this magnitude. They started a war...We are fighting back...and now you want to say we are the bad guys...Get real.There can be only one explanation: Sept. 11. That terrible day in 2001 transformed us in many ways, but the most subtle and insidious change was how it sapped our national confidence. The terrorist attacks provoked in us not courage, but fear -- fear of being victimized again, as we were that day. We've reacted like the rape victim whose faith in human nature is crushed by anxiety and suspicion, rather than the one who fights back spiritually, refusing to be degraded by a degrading act.First our nation is about as United and proud as it has ever been in my life time. You are comparing war to rape?? Since when to countries get attacked and not strike back. I am glad though that you realize we were the victim. Do you think if we did not enhance our internal security that we would not be hit again by terrorists? They hate us and want to see every last one of us dead if possible. To top it off their hate is all in the name of God. There is no reason with people like that. Undoubtedly they would have struck us again. We will not roll over and let them do it again, and you have a problem with that. (Still no alternative solution from you other than bending over and taking it in the ass) Bush told us that we needed to attack Iraq for our security, and we accepted it. He told us that we needed to compromise certain civil rights to help catch terrorists, and we accepted it. He told us that our security required us to detain suspects without charges or access to lawyers, and we accepted it. It's as if the American people, shivering with fear, are huddling around Bush as if he were a shepherd. Do whatever you must, dear shepherd; just protect us. Consequently: We won't even question economic policies that have created a weakdollar, a soft stock market and creeping unemployment.Normalnoises told you Iraq was no threat and you accepted it. Your hippie wanna be friends told you your civil liberties are more important than other peoples lives and you accepted it. Some crazy ass professor told you everything including the economy is Bush's fault and you accepted it. Now since you wish you were part of the hippie age who was against Vietnam you now finally have your chance to protest something and you are taking it in full stride. As far as the economy was concerned you honestly think that the stock market was overinflated?? Internet based companies were selling for $60 a share and upwards(and these were companies who were making no profit) Yahoo was selling in the $400's per share at one point. Turns out the Internet didn't pan out as quickly as investors had hoped, and this is Bush's fault??? $100 stocks are selling in the $1-2 range(and that is the good considering some do not even exist anymore). Not because of Bush.. but because there prices were inflated by overly optimistic investors. It made us intellectually passive -- which frightens me much more than a hijacked airliner More evidence of speaking the revised words of same nut bag professor who like you is not in touch with reality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassa Posted June 19 Author Report Share Posted June 19 Originally posted by skince55 So many holes in your sermon...I dont even know where to startEnron...WorldCom....9/11....technology bubble popping. None of those things had to do with our current economy??? Honestly...were any of these things Bush's fault??Why don't you give the tax cuts a chance to fail before you blame them for the economy?? His most recent cuts have not had time to impact the economy yet. Has our nation ever experienced a threat similar to the one we are experiencing today?? Right, thats what I thought. So until you come up with a better solution...please do not comment on this. As they had done to us. They openely opposed our stance on Iraq, which removed any teeth the United Nations had as an eforcement body in the world. Iraq repeatedly violated UN resolutions and they wanted to give it more time. What were they waiting for? All of Manahattan's population to be murdered by a chemical agent?First replace "sovereign nation" with "terrorist sponsoring nation"(and don't say they are not because the families of palestinian suicide bombers were recieving money from saddam). Second he did establish why it was urgent and necessary. Example...Iraq was unable to account for certain aspects of their wmd programs. We live in a different world today with new threats. I applaud Bush for not sitting back and waiting for some terrorist to walk into NYC with a liter of Iraq produced sarin and wipe out the entire city. (thats right only 1 liter...very easy to conceal...especially in a country the size of California)Your right about one thing here. America has never experienced anything like this. We were never had a terrorist attack of this magnitude. They started a war...We are fighting back...and now you want to say we are the bad guys...Get real.First our nation is about as United and proud as it has ever been in my life time. You are comparing war to rape?? Since when to countries get attacked and not strike back. I am glad though that you realize we were the victim. Do you think if we did not enhance our internal security that we would not be hit again by terrorists? They hate us and want to see every last one of us dead if possible. To top it off their hate is all in the name of God. There is no reason with people like that. Undoubtedly they would have struck us again. We will not roll over and let them do it again, and you have a problem with that. (Still no alternative solution from you other than bending over and taking it in the ass)Normalnoises told you Iraq was no threat and you accepted it. Your hippie wanna be friends told you your civil liberties are more important than other peoples lives and you accepted it. Some crazy ass professor told you everything including the economy is Bush's fault and you accepted it. Now since you wish you were part of the hippie age who was against Vietnam you now finally have your chance to protest something and you are taking it in full stride. As far as the economy was concerned you honestly think that the stock market was overinflated?? Internet based companies were selling for $60 a share and upwards(and these were companies who were making no profit) Yahoo was selling in the $400's per share at one point. Turns out the Internet didn't pan out as quickly as investors had hoped, and this is Bush's fault??? $100 stocks are selling in the $1-2 range(and that is the good considering some do not even exist anymore). Not because of Bush.. but because there prices were inflated by overly optimistic investors. More evidence of speaking the revised words of same nut bag professor who like you is not in touch with reality. :laugh: omg, do you even know who wrote this????? a top foreign policy advisor in washington, dc.....and you think you have the smarts to dissect this and say it is full of holes....so i guess this man doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about....so i wonder, how did he retain his job and how did he manage to be in this field for over 30 years....hmmmm.... :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunk Posted June 19 Report Share Posted June 19 Originally posted by sassa and you think you have the smarts to dissect this and say it is full of holes....so i guess this man doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about....so i wonder, how did he retain his job and how did he manage to be in this field for over 30 years....hmmmm.... :rolleyes: I guess we should accept it at face value then huh? Even people with decades of experience and education have agendas. Skince did a nice job of pointing out flaws in the man's argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassa Posted June 19 Author Report Share Posted June 19 no, i didn't say that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skince55 Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 Originally posted by sassa :laugh: omg, do you even know who wrote this????? a top foreign policy advisor in washington, dc.....and you think you have the smarts to dissect this and say it is full of holes....so i guess this man doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about....so i wonder, how did he retain his job and how did he manage to be in this field for over 30 years....hmmmm.... :rolleyes: Thank you Drunk. sassa since when is a person's position with what you like to call our Nazi government's credentials enough for them to be respected by you?? The answer is as soon as they agree with you. I don't see you respecting the things Bush, Powell, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft say just because they are top officials in the government. So since I am unable to dissect what this unnamed official says how come you think you have the smarts to dissect what Bush,Powell, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft do? I guess they don't know what they are talking about. So I wonder how did these people manage to reach these positions........hmmmmmmm..... :rolleyes: Perfect example of your hypocrisy at its fullest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr mahs Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 Originally posted by sassa Where did the feisty Americans go?It will be a question historians will debate perhaps for centuries to come.How did a president remain solidly popular with the American people, eventhough: The economy stagnated during his watch;He turned a projected federal surplus of $5.7 trillion over the nextinto a projected $2 trillion deficit, fueled by huge tax cuts thatenriched the wealthy and failed to stimulate the economy;He proposed and won more tax cuts, though most economists warned thatthey wouldn't likely create many jobs;His administration trimmed basic domestic civil rights, including theright to privacy, counsel and habeas corpus;He openly scorned relations with traditional allies and potentialfriends worldwide;He launched a war against a sovereign nation without establishing whyit was urgent and necessary, and without achieving any of his stated goalsfor attacking, except regime change;The company once headed by his vice president landed a no-bid contractin Iraq far more lucrative than originally revealed?There has never been anything like this in American political history.Despite a record of budget irresponsibility, international discord,warmongering and even scandal, the Bush veneer is hardly scuffed.It isn't anything about Bush; it's about us. We've changed, and not for thebetter.It seems only yesterday that the typical American took a delicious pride inholding the feet of political leaders -- even the ones we admired -- to thefire. Whether it was Nixon or Carter or Reagan or Clinton, presidents havehad to endure the relentless heat of popular scrutiny. Until now.Bush exists in a dimension far beyond having to fend off criticism. It's asif critical evaluation itself has gone into hibernation. Virtually nobodyquestions Bush -- not the opposition Democrats, not the bulk of the media,and by all reckoning, not the public.There can be only one explanation: Sept. 11. That terrible day in 2001transformed us in many ways, but the most subtle and insidious change washow it sapped our national confidence.The terrorist attacks provoked in us not courage, but fear -- fear of beingvictimized again, as we were that day. We've reacted like the rape victimwhose faith in human nature is crushed by anxiety and suspicion, ratherthan the one who fights back spiritually, refusing to be degraded by adegrading act.Bush told us that we needed to attack Iraq for our security, and weaccepted it. He told us that we needed to compromise certain civil rightsto help catch terrorists, and we accepted it. He told us that our securityrequired us to detain suspects without charges or access to lawyers, and weaccepted it.It's as if the American people, shivering with fear, are huddling aroundBush as if he were a shepherd. Do whatever you must, dear shepherd; justprotect us. Consequently:We won't even question economic policies that have created a weakdollar, a soft stock market and creeping unemployment.We won't explore the logic of disarming the newly freed Iraqi people,while backing a resumption of sales of assault-style weapons at home.We won't evaluate the ludicrous notion that Haitian asylum seekersmust be imprisoned as a matter of national security, even as migrants fromcommunist Cuba are allowed to swim ashore and go free.When I press Bush supporters on his record, they invariably respond withgeneral references to faith and trust: He has good reasons for what he hasdone. Time will prove him right. He's a good man.That's no America I recognize. Some amount of faith is fine and healthy.But aren't we Americans supposed to be feisty, indomitable, demanding,assertive, skeptical?Sept. 11 rightly made us more cautious and more vigilant. But it alsodiminished us. We're less tolerant of dissent; less thoughtful about worldissues; less concerned with principles of justice, fairness and equity; and-- to the apparent benefit of Bush's poll numbers -- less demanding of ourpolitical leaders.It made us intellectually passive -- which frightens me much more than ahijacked airliner Okay where do I start?? let see this loon def does not know ANYTHING about buisness cycles and would rather put blame on a REPUBLICAN president. Why glorify a modern day crook who rode the coattails of a record expansion due to a tech bubble??? I will go and pick apart his bullshit essay and maybe after proceed to wiping my ass with it 1) The fell in March of 2000 uneder BUBBA'S watch but no left wing loon will ever admit that... it would tarnish the so called legacy of probably one of the worst corrupt shallow presidents ever...2) I guess 2 skyscrapers falling in down town manhatten stalling a 10 trillion dollar a year economy for close to a week wouldn't have effected are economy if Bubbas was in office. I bet it would have taken Bubba 1 week to meet with the CIA instead of 3 weeks he wasted before meeting with Woosley after the Cole bombing. -Also this guy should pick up a IRS manual and realise we are taxed on a progressive scale meaning the more you make the more you are taxed. In the left's eye a person making over 28k is considered rich and pays 90% of the taxes why wouldn't they get the break?? this is lunacy left wing social class warfare that makes them look dumber by the argument.... 3- They only trimmed the non-existent rights of illegal aliens and enemy combatants no one else... I haven't been effected in any other way then being safer and I appreciate it.... Thank God for John Ashcroft!!!!!!!4- He scorned ties with WASHED UP SUPERPOWERS that would rather appeas then act, because of a little 8 billion IOU someone owed them....5- He was the first person to grow a pair and go after a vicous dictator who tortured & harbored terrorists and had a active WMD program. And did we forget that this certain dictator wiped his ass with 17 reslotutionsover 12 years. The lefts argument is weak and has a chipped peg leg to stand on, period....6- Cheneys employment ended in 98 and if this nutbag checked history Halliburton has won contracts like this for years under diffrent party presidents .. How many co's can do what Halliburton does??? there's your answer...Bush approval ratings are so high because this country was faced with a promblem and he and his administartion grabbed it by the horns and is doing everything possible to defeat it.... Bush in 2004! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr mahs Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 Originally posted by skince55 So many holes in your sermon...I dont even know where to startEnron...WorldCom....9/11....technology bubble popping. None of those things had to do with our current economy??? Honestly...were any of these things Bush's fault??Why don't you give the tax cuts a chance to fail before you blame them for the economy?? His most recent cuts have not had time to impact the economy yet. Has our nation ever experienced a threat similar to the one we are experiencing today?? Right, thats what I thought. So until you come up with a better solution...please do not comment on this. As they had done to us. They openely opposed our stance on Iraq, which removed any teeth the United Nations had as an eforcement body in the world. Iraq repeatedly violated UN resolutions and they wanted to give it more time. What were they waiting for? All of Manahattan's population to be murdered by a chemical agent?First replace "sovereign nation" with "terrorist sponsoring nation"(and don't say they are not because the families of palestinian suicide bombers were recieving money from saddam). Second he did establish why it was urgent and necessary. Example...Iraq was unable to account for certain aspects of their wmd programs. We live in a different world today with new threats. I applaud Bush for not sitting back and waiting for some terrorist to walk into NYC with a liter of Iraq produced sarin and wipe out the entire city. (thats right only 1 liter...very easy to conceal...especially in a country the size of California)Your right about one thing here. America has never experienced anything like this. We were never had a terrorist attack of this magnitude. They started a war...We are fighting back...and now you want to say we are the bad guys...Get real.First our nation is about as United and proud as it has ever been in my life time. You are comparing war to rape?? Since when to countries get attacked and not strike back. I am glad though that you realize we were the victim. Do you think if we did not enhance our internal security that we would not be hit again by terrorists? They hate us and want to see every last one of us dead if possible. To top it off their hate is all in the name of God. There is no reason with people like that. Undoubtedly they would have struck us again. We will not roll over and let them do it again, and you have a problem with that. (Still no alternative solution from you other than bending over and taking it in the ass)Normalnoises told you Iraq was no threat and you accepted it. Your hippie wanna be friends told you your civil liberties are more important than other peoples lives and you accepted it. Some crazy ass professor told you everything including the economy is Bush's fault and you accepted it. Now since you wish you were part of the hippie age who was against Vietnam you now finally have your chance to protest something and you are taking it in full stride. As far as the economy was concerned you honestly think that the stock market was overinflated?? Internet based companies were selling for $60 a share and upwards(and these were companies who were making no profit) Yahoo was selling in the $400's per share at one point. Turns out the Internet didn't pan out as quickly as investors had hoped, and this is Bush's fault??? $100 stocks are selling in the $1-2 range(and that is the good considering some do not even exist anymore). Not because of Bush.. but because there prices were inflated by overly optimistic investors. More evidence of speaking the revised words of same nut bag professor who like you is not in touch with reality. Good points..Leave it to leftie loons to knownothing about economic cycles...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassa Posted June 21 Author Report Share Posted June 21 Originally posted by skince55 Thank you Drunk. sassa since when is a person's position with what you like to call our Nazi government's credentials enough for them to be respected by you?? The answer is as soon as they agree with you. I don't see you respecting the things Bush, Powell, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft say just because they are top officials in the government. So since I am unable to dissect what this unnamed official says how come you think you have the smarts to dissect what Bush,Powell, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft do? I guess they don't know what they are talking about. So I wonder how did these people manage to reach these positions........hmmmmmmm..... :rolleyes: Perfect example of your hypocrisy at its fullest. what...???? BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skince55 Posted June 21 Report Share Posted June 21 Originally posted by sassa what...???? BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA! Its okay you dont have to respond. I know you are a hypocrite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassa Posted June 23 Author Report Share Posted June 23 Originally posted by skince55 Its okay you dont have to respond. I know you are a hypocrite funny, you have proven yourself to be one a few times already....like the pot calling the kettle black Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.