igloo Posted January 31 Author Report Share Posted January 31 do the bush haters ever tire of being so consistently wrong?being wrong never stopped the bush haters...they just keep tripping over the same rock. Even when the other side tells them "watch out for that rock".....they only tend to trip harder.give 'em hell igloo....i missed all this bullshit...........want some good laughs,,,lets watch the actions and facial expression from the demz tonight at the SOTU address......I think the demz will have that "i just bit into a lemon" face.........like they always do!.....Looking forward to it tonight! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix_Leiter Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 do you ever tire of reposting arguments?you absolutely contribute nothing here...go moderate a goldfrapp forum or somethiing.. youd be less of a waste..pasty white retard. get a tan or something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix_Leiter Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 Dittojust curious as to what scientific facts you were referring to when you said they couldnt be ignored.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghhhhhost Posted January 31 Report Share Posted January 31 Thankfully, it's because of people exactly the opposite of you that we landed on the moon and explored space. You enjoy the liberty you have INSPITE of yourself!what does that have to do with anything? u liberated moon people? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigpoppanils Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 you absolutely contribute nothing here...go moderate a goldfrapp forum or somethiing.. youd be less of a waste..pasty white retard. get a tan or somethingand what do you contribute besides whining about how useless other members are? use the ignore button. oh wait...you can't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ou812 Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 just curious as to what scientific facts you were referring to when you said they couldnt be ignored..Just some random stuff as an example. Flight 93's impact crater for example could only be causes by a vertical or near vertical impact, would you agree?http://www.worldnewsstand.net/2002/new/united_flight_93_crater_200_179.jpgNo discernable skidding or sliding coming from any direction, 2 wings imprints 180 degrees opposed and the fuselage imprint in the middle. A Boeing 757 can't go into a dive at that steep an angle, it's Pegasus flight control software does not allow maneuvers which put the aircraft and occupants in danger, such as high-G banks (as much as 5Gs according to the flight paths), and sudden dives. (this kind of puts a dent in the supposed flight path of Flight 77 into the Pentagon as well at least according to the speeds it supposedly carried and angle of approach that was detailed and given to us)http://www.boeing.com/commercial/757family/pf/pf_300back.htmlhttp://www.boeing.com/commercial/caft/reference/documents/RNP.pdfNow this is where a "conspiracy theorist" would say perhaps 93 was shot at by the airforce damaged it's flight controls and caused to crash, all I'm saying is somthing clearly doesn't add up.At the WTC ignited jet fuel burned hot enough to weaken steel and cause the building to collapse as was conlcuded by the 9/11 Commission. About 9000 gallons of jet fuel was on flight 93 when it would've crashed. Yet in that picture up there grass and other folliage is still growing right up to where 9000 gallons of ignited jet fuel and +1000 degree fires would have been burning. In NY jet fuel burns hot enough to weaken steel, in PA it isn't hot enough to incinerate some nearby grass?Now for example if you can explain either of those 2 scenarios to me please do so. If all you are going to say is fuck you and your stupid conspiracy theory BS, then don't bother to respond. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix_Leiter Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 Just some random stuff as an example. Flight 93's impact crater for example could only be causes by a vertical or near vertical impact, would you agree?http://bbs.clubplanet.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=42145&stc=1&d=1138751141http://www.worldnewsstand.net/2002/new/united_flight_93_crater_200_179.jpgNo discernable skidding or sliding coming from any direction, 2 wings imprints 180 degrees opposed and the fuselage imprint in the middle. A Boeing 757 can't go into a dive at that steep an angle, it's Pegasus flight control software does not allow maneuvers which put the aircraft and occupants in danger, such as high-G banks (as much as 5Gs according to the flight paths), and sudden dives. (this kind of puts a dent in the supposed flight path of Flight 77 into the Pentagon as well at least according to the speeds it supposedly carried and angle of approach that was detailed and given to us)http://www.boeing.com/commercial/757family/pf/pf_300back.htmlhttp://www.boeing.com/commercial/caft/reference/documents/RNP.pdfNow this is where a "conspiracy theorist" would say perhaps 93 was shot at by the airforce damaged it's flight controls and caused to crash, all I'm saying is somthing clearly doesn't add up.At the WTC ignited jet fuel burned hot enough to weaken steel and cause the building to collapse as was conlcuded by the 9/11 Commission. About 9000 gallons of jet fuel was on flight 93 when it would've crashed. Yet in that picture up there grass and other folliage is still growing right up to where 9000 gallons of ignited jet fuel and +1000 degree fires would have been burning. In NY jet fuel burns hot enough to weaken steel, in PA it isn't hot enough to incinerate some nearby grass?Now for example if you can explain either of those 2 scenarios to me please do so. If all you are going to say is fuck you and your stupid conspiracy theory BS, then don't bother to respond.oooo im not disputing that.. the plane could have very well been shot down.. me and you dont know since we werent there.. i thought you were one of those that believed in the conspiracy that the US orchestrated 9/11 from the get go.. which is extremely far fetched Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
destruction Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 Using igloo's own words against him 101:Son, please STFU....I do not label everyone who disagrees with Bush as a hater of America, far from it douchebag.. Why don't you take your repulsive ass and leave the country you so clearly hate http://bbs.clubplanet.com/showpost.php?p=1326267&postcount=7You are such a fucking lying douchebag it's patheitc.And to make sure you cannot re-edit the post where I found this, I went print screen mode (print screen key), I then went to start/accessories/paint and in paint, I went to the edit menu and chose paste in the drop down menu, then saved it as a .png file, then uploaded it as an attachment below.... and in link....http://bbs.clubplanet.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=42147&d=1138774043Iglooser, YOU'RE BUSTED! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drlogic Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 what does that have to do with anything? u liberated moon people?Thank you for illustrating your utter ignorance and comprehension of current events and historical references.....BRUTO! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix_Leiter Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 Using igloo's own words against him 101:http://bbs.clubplanet.com/showpost.php?p=1326267&postcount=7You are such a fucking lying douchebag it's patheitc.And to make sure you cannot re-edit the post where I found this, I went print screen mode (print screen key), I then went to start/accessories/paint and in paint, I went to the edit menu and chose paste in the drop down menu, then saved it as a .png file, then uploaded it as an attachment below.... and in link....http://bbs.clubplanet.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=42147&d=1138774043Iglooser, YOU'RE BUSTED! "pathetic".. the term "reaching" has hit a new high... or should I say low Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigpoppanils Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 Just some random stuff as an example. Flight 93's impact crater for example could only be causes by a vertical or near vertical impact, would you agree?http://www.worldnewsstand.net/2002/new/united_flight_93_crater_200_179.jpgNo discernable skidding or sliding coming from any direction, 2 wings imprints 180 degrees opposed and the fuselage imprint in the middle. A Boeing 757 can't go into a dive at that steep an angle, it's Pegasus flight control software does not allow maneuvers which put the aircraft and occupants in danger, such as high-G banks (as much as 5Gs according to the flight paths), and sudden dives. (this kind of puts a dent in the supposed flight path of Flight 77 into the Pentagon as well at least according to the speeds it supposedly carried and angle of approach that was detailed and given to us)http://www.boeing.com/commercial/757family/pf/pf_300back.htmlhttp://www.boeing.com/commercial/caft/reference/documents/RNP.pdfNow this is where a "conspiracy theorist" would say perhaps 93 was shot at by the airforce damaged it's flight controls and caused to crash, all I'm saying is somthing clearly doesn't add up.At the WTC ignited jet fuel burned hot enough to weaken steel and cause the building to collapse as was conlcuded by the 9/11 Commission. About 9000 gallons of jet fuel was on flight 93 when it would've crashed. Yet in that picture up there grass and other folliage is still growing right up to where 9000 gallons of ignited jet fuel and +1000 degree fires would have been burning. In NY jet fuel burns hot enough to weaken steel, in PA it isn't hot enough to incinerate some nearby grass?Now for example if you can explain either of those 2 scenarios to me please do so. If all you are going to say is fuck you and your stupid conspiracy theory BS, then don't bother to respond.Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax PRWEB) - Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11. ADVERTISEMENTThey have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent "another Pearl Harbor."They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking.They are encouraging news services around the world to secure scientific advice by taking advantage of university resources to verify or to falsify their discoveries. Extraordinary situations, they believe, require extraordinary measures.If this were done, they contend, one of the great hoaxes of history would stand naked before the eyes of the world and its perpetrators would be clearly exposed, which may be the only hope for saving this nation from ever greater abuse.They hope this might include The New York Times, which, in their opinion, has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expecedt from our nation's newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable lapses. It has failed to vigorously investigate tainted elections, lies leading to the war in Iraq, or illegal NSA spying on the American people, major unconstitutional events. In their view, The Times might compensate for its loss of stature by helping to reveal the truth about one of the great turning-point events of modern history.Stunning as it may be to acknowledge, they observe, the government has brought but one indictment against anyone and, to the best of their knowledge, has not even reprimanded anyone for incompetence or dereliction of duty. The official conspiracy theory--that nineteen Arab hijackers under control of one man in the wilds of Afghanistan brought this about--is unsupportable by the evidential data, which they have studied. They even believe there are good reasons for suspecting that video tapes officially attributed to Osama bin Laden are not genuine.They have found the government's own investigiation to be severely flawed. The 9/11 Commission, designated to investigate the attack, was directed by Philip Zelikow, part of the Bush transition team in the NSA sector and the co-author of a book with Condoleezza Rice. A Bush supporter and director of national security affairs, he could hardly be expected to conduct an objective and impartial investigation.They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin has documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely ignores the collapse of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by no airplanes, was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the attack.Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholar find profoundly troubling:* In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?* The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How is this possible?* Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?* Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this possible?* Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this possible?* Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible? * A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this possible? * A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is this possible? * The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this possible? Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints. These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality." http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/20060130/bs_prweb/prweb339303_5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
destruction Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 "pathetic".. the term "reaching" has hit a new high... or should I say low Pissed off 'cos your bed bitch got caught lying and I shown the evidence to back it up??Seriously. STFU. Crawl back up the hole where your mom shat you out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drlogic Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 Pissed off 'cos your bed bitch got caught lying and I shown the evidence to back it up??Seriously. STFU. Crawl back up the hole where your mom shat you out.BUSTED! You're plagiarizing my line about you being "shat" by your mom!....I guess you liked that one, Scooter????????......Here are a couple more you're free to steal:10 lbs. of dangling fury (when refering to ones dick)If I ain't runnin' wit' ya', I'm flying right beside ya'! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ou812 Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drlogic Posted February 1 Report Share Posted February 1 4 wut it's worth...I like the "ride it like u stole it" line. here's more: When refering to an anus(lol) try using:corn holesalad shooterbrown eyebota caca (spanish for:dumps shit) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
destruction Posted February 2 Report Share Posted February 2 Wow... You said a funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghhhhhost Posted February 2 Report Share Posted February 2 Thank you for illustrating your utter ignorance and comprehension of current events and historical references.....BRUTO!ur right..my ignorance to ur obscure references is obvious...but ur attempt @ some poetic response is even worse than my so called ignorance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.