underwater

i liked them jackass....

if you don't understand by now you are a lost cause....should have kept up with your current events magellanmax

spread the word..... ...... destroy the great satan!! ..... i listened to a couple of your mixes..... very nice!!.....

i see your point....but its not like that picture is from 1990....its 20 years old.....maybe they played a little slap and tickle....

i hate when people say #6......funny post...

i doubt anyone cares about that picture at this point in time....it changes nothing....the facts remain the facts

i can't wait until we catch this bastard

thats what the dessert rats are saying.....the british force wants to let all force out, get the job done, secure the area, and be done with it....they feel the war has too much of a surgical strategy.....

this thread is out of control

the are conscripted and forced to serve in the army.....are army is 100% comprised of people who volunteered to sign the dotted line.....

you can absolutely shoot a soldier that will put the group in danger.....that provision is 100% correct.....however....you can't kill them unless his actions are putting your forces life in danger.....it is against geneva conventions to murder men who are standing and waving white flags trying to save their own lives and not endangering anyone.....that is murder....

Then can it not be said that they are acting disloyal to the country they are supposed to be serving? They are forced to serve in the armed forcesthrough conscription so the "loyalty" factor can't come into play.....They have no interest in dying for Saddam or his regime.....In fact, the people who are surrendering actually will welcome the fall of the governement..... they are in fact breaking a code of ethics in their unit and army force? So the fact that they are killed I dont view as wrong because killing is wrong, like most people are doing, and then going further as to calling them animals. The people who are killing the men that are surrendering are not part of the organized military....they are part of Saddams private terror squard (a non-government entity) that rules with an iron fist using tactics of terror, torture, and murder.....They have been doing this for 30 years.....Murdering or torturing innocents who do not want to be FORCED to live under oppresive dictorship....so my question to you is.... How can it have anything to do with military ethics if the men doing the murdering are not part of the Iraqi military? If looked at from that perspective you could argue that they are in fact closer to the bare level of being "animals" being that they engaged in the activity long before this war started. Therefore, their actions are not a direct result of military action. They have been slaughtering dissenters, both military and non-military, for decades. so then to call Iraqi soldiers animals you would have to call American soldiers animals as well. thats what i have been saying all along....

war is the lowest form of action that any humans can take against each other.....it lowers all parties involved to the status of an animal.....it enacts darwanism and the strongest will prevail.....IMO there are no "rules" of war, there is only the ability to act in a manor that is consistent with your values......the iraqi regime does not place a high "value" on their civilians.....the US does put a high priority to avoid civilian casualties......we are all still animals with different values and capabilities....

CIA estimates that 25,000 iraqi solidiers have been killed.....Civilian casualties range from 175 - 285....

war is war.....if i was the iraqis i would do the same shit....its self-preservation.....cowardly....but you could say the same thing about guerilla fighting tactics used in the US revolutionary war.....

even dolphins support this war!!!

rise up....

i think public opinion will remain high until this thing is through.....i see it dropping if we start killing civilians.....

they are probably next on the hitlist.....

03/24/2003 Dow Jones News Services (Copyright © 2003 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.) NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--U.S. officials said Monday that no chemical weapons were found at a suspected site at Najaf in central Iraq, U.S. television networks reported. NBC News reported from the Pentagon that no chemicals at all were found at the site. CNN, also reporting from the Pentagon, said officials now believe the plant there was abandoned long ago by the Iraqis. (END) Dow Jones Newswires 03-24-03 1222ET

this kinda thing is just not right...

i really don't think anyone takes this board to seriously.....its a place to kill time and discuss events.....

i guess you forgot about the fact that germany,france, and italy have all foiled terrorist plots within their borders.....

blasphemy....