I honestly think this Mitchell report isnt a full representation of the # of juicers in MLB. Far from it ! I think the number Jose Canseco says might be just about right (over 70%) And what I cant comprehend is how Jose implies that A-Rod is a cheat and A-Rod doesnt even sue him for libel or defamation of character. For chrissakes, even top doper Sammy Sosa didnt even appear in the report!! Anybody with a half a brain would have done so. But then again, there might be some truth to it. We all chastisized Barry Bonds for his steroid use to help him shatter baseball's all time records, but at the same token, we (media & fans) give the newly outed phonies the benefit of the doubt. Anybody still thinks that asterisks should be stuck in this generation player stats ? What about those guys who amassed records during the minority barred era....should they be tagged too ? This thing opens up a can of worms nobody wants to deal with. One columnist said it best: What the HOF should do is let the records stand BUT with a cliffnote at the beginning stating that the records were achieved during differtent eras with controversies and let the fan/viewer decide on who's great or not Just because Clemens was erroneously mentioned in the media in a different federal inquiry doesnt make him innocent, I believe he's been a doper for a long time. Lets forget this doping thing and focus back on the sport. Just my opinion.