destruction

Freedom of speech does those strange kind of things. Scary, isn't it, Billy?

PRESIDENT BUSH – Overall Job Rating in recent news media/nonpartisan national polls See also: Complete trend Survey Approve Disap- prove Unsure Approve minus Dates % % % Disapprove . Quinnipiac RV 11/28 - 12/4/05 40 54 7 -14 . Time 11/29 - 12/1/05 41 53 5 -12 . FOX/Opinion Dynamics RV 11/29-30/05 42 48 10 -6 . Cook/RT Strategies 11/17-20/05 41 52 7 -11 . Gallup 11/17-20/05 38 57 5 -19 . Diageo/Hotline RV 11/11-15/05 39 59 2 -20 . CNN/USA Today/Gallup 11/11-13/05 37 60 3 -23 . Newsweek 11/10-11/05 36 58 6 -22 . Gallup 11/7-10/05 40 55 5 -15 . FOX/Opinion Dynamics RV 11/8-9/05 36 53 11 -17 . AP-Ipsos * 11/7-9/05 37 61 -24 . NBC/Wall Street Journal 11/4-7/05 38 57 5 -19 . Pew 11/3-6/05 36 55 9 -19 . AP-Ipsos * 10/31 - 11/2/05 37 59 -22 . ABC/Washington Post 10/30 - 11/2/05 39 60 1 -21 . CBS 10/30 - 11/1/05 35 57 8 -22 . CNN/USA Today/Gallup 10/28-30/05 41 56 3 -15 . ABC/Washington Post 10/28-29/05 39 58 3 -19 . FOX/Opinion Dynamics RV 10/25-26/05 41 51 8 -10 . Gallup 10/24-26/05 41 56 3 -15 . Pew 10/12-24/05 40 52 8 -12 . CNN/USA Today/Gallup 10/21-23/05 42 55 3 -13 . WNBC/Marist RV 10/12-13 & 17/05 41 53 6 -12 . CNN/USA Today/Gallup 10/13-16/05 39 58 3 -19 . Diageo/Hotline RV 10/12-16/05 40 57 2 -17 . FOX/Opinion Dynamics RV 10/11-12/05 40 51 9 -11 . NBC/Wall Street Journal 10/8-10/05 39 54 7 -15 . Pew 10/6-10/05 38 56 6 -18 . AP-Ipsos * 10/3-5/05 39 58 -19 . CBS 10/3-5/05 37 58 5 -21 . Newsweek 9/29-30/05 40 53 7 -13 . FOX/Opinion Dynamics RV 9/27-28/05 45 47 8 -2 . CNN/USA Today/Gallup 9/26-28/05 45 50 5 -5 . ABC/Washington Post 9/8-11/05 42 57 1 -15 . Pew 9/8-11/05 40 52 8 -12 . Time 9/7-8/05 42 52 6 -10 http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm GO BUSH!!! HE'S AWESOME!!!

you think with your cock so what's your excuse?

crackhead ^^

Happy you stole a car? Or happy your daughter put out for you? I already know you stole that computer.

Even Jesus forgives everyone of their sins, right? Zarqawi, Saddam, Uday, Qusay, Atta, Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfailed etc... But since I'm JESUS, I make exception to the above.

Halliburton is your girl. Too bad you didn't. You. dr. logic, igloo, got milk, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfailed, YOU, etc... etc... etc... Did you mean to say, DOY??? Halliburton is your God. Because halliburton is your god. Sucker! I suggest you tell Rush Limbaugh to stay out of the medicine cabinet (oxy-contin)?? By revealing the lies of the pentagons' planting of lies to make the US look like little angels and do gooders. Don't it SUCK to get ratted out??? Prove it, fagtard. Yep. Because propaganda is truth and facts are lies. I should've realized that. Gotta love your backwards logic. "See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda" http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/05/20050524-3.html prop·a·gan·da n. The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause. Material disseminated by the advocates or opponents of a doctrine or cause: wartime propaganda. Propaganda Roman Catholic Church. A division of the Roman Curia that has authority in the matter of preaching the gospel, of establishing the Church in non-Christian countries, and of administering Church missions in territories where there is no properly organized hierarchy. So, when are you going to enlist? Oh I forgot, you rather send someone else's kid off to war to die for Halliburton so you won't have to.

By revealing the lies of the pentagons' planting of lies to make the US look like little angels and do gooders. Don't it SUCK to get ratted out??? Prove it, fagtard. Yep. Because propaganda is truth and facts are lies. I should've realized that. Gotta love your backwards logic. "See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda" http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/05/20050524-3.html prop·a·gan·da n. The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause. Material disseminated by the advocates or opponents of a doctrine or cause: wartime propaganda. Propaganda Roman Catholic Church. A division of the Roman Curia that has authority in the matter of preaching the gospel, of establishing the Church in non-Christian countries, and of administering Church missions in territories where there is no properly organized hierarchy.So, when are you going to enlist? Oh I forgot, you rather send someone else's kid off to war to die for Halliburton so you won't have to.

Because............. I like you. You're my friend. God forgive America http://bbs.clubplanet.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=41806&stc=1&d=1133665262

I'm gonna punch your face is still a threat you pussy. Shut up and stop defending your criminally minded brother, fagtard.

Igloo, Dr Logic and the rest of you neocon supporting losers. You have been exposed as propaganda hounds. All your shit is now proven to be propaganda. YOU HAVE BEEN EXPOSED! December 3, 2005 Military Admits Planting News in Iraq By ERIC SCHMITT WASHINGTON, Dec. 2 - The military acknowledged Friday in a briefing for a ranking Senate Republican that news articles written by American troops had been placed as paid advertisements in the Iraqi news media and not always properly identified. Senator John W. Warner of Virginia, who heads the Senate Armed Services Committee, told reporters after receiving a 25-minute briefing from officials at the Pentagon that senior commanders in Iraq were trying to get to the bottom of a program that apparently also paid monthly stipends to friendly Iraqi journalists. Mr. Warner said there had been no indications yet that the paid propaganda had been false. But he said that disclosures that an American company, under contract to the Pentagon, was making secret payments to plant articles with positive messages about the United States military mission could undermine the Bush administration's goals in Iraq and jeopardize Iraq's developing democratic institutions. "I remain gravely concerned about the situation," he said. He said he had been told that the articles or advertisements were intended to counter disinformation in the Iraqi news media that was hurting the American military's efforts to stabilize the country. Under the program, the Lincoln Group, a Washington-based public relations firm working in Iraq, was hired to translate articles written by American troops into Arabic and then, in many cases, give them to advertising agencies for placement in the Iraqi news media. Some of the articles failed to carry a required disclaimer that they were paid for, Mr. Warner said. Defense officials said it was unclear what the disclaimer was supposed to say, whether it had been left off by the Lincoln Group or by Iraqi publishers and whether the omission was deliberate. Mr. Warner said the articles had been produced by the information operations staff under Lt. Gen. John R. Vines, who oversees day-to-day operations in Iraq. The senator said a senior officer had reviewed all the materials that were provided to the Lincoln Group for placement, and that military lawyers checked all materials produced by the military or Lincoln. Lt. Col. Barry Johnson, a military spokesman in Iraq, said contractors like the Lincoln Group had been used to market the articles to reduce the risk to Iraqi publishers, who might be attacked if they were seen as being closely linked to the military. "If any part of our process does not have our full confidence, we will examine that activity and take appropriate action," he said in a statement. "If any contractor is failing to perform as we have intended, we will take appropriate action." On Friday, the Lincoln Group defended its practices, saying it had been trying to counter insurgent propaganda with accounts of heroism by allied forces. "Lincoln Group has consistently worked with the Iraqi media to promote truthful reporting across Iraq," Laurie Adler, a company spokeswoman, said in a statement. But Congressional Democrats said the Lincoln Group activities were the latest example of questionable public relations policies by the administration. In an earlier case, payments were made to columnists, among them Armstrong Williams, who received $240,000, undisclosed at the time, for promoting No Child Left Behind, the administration's education initiative. In January, President Bush publicly abandoned this practice. "From Armstrong Williams to fake TV news, we know this White House has tried multiple times to buy the news at home," Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, said in a release on Friday. "Now, we need to find out if they've exported this practice to the Middle East." Also on Friday, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, called on the acting Pentagon inspector general, Thomas F. Gimble, to investigate the Lincoln Group's activities to see if they amounted to an illegal covert operation. "The Pentagon's devious scheme to place favorable propaganda in Iraqi newspapers speaks volumes about the president's credibility gap," Mr. Kennedy said. "If Americans were truly welcomed in Iraq as liberators, we wouldn't have to doctor the news for the Iraqi people." Larry Di Rita, the chief Pentagon spokesman, said General Vines and his staff in Iraq insisted that their activities with Lincoln had been "in accordance with all policies and guidelines." Mr. Di Rita said in a telephone interview that for now, the Lincoln Group would continue its efforts while military officials reviewed the overall program. Mr. Di Rita said that military officials were also trying to determine what, if any, payments Lincoln made to Iraqi journalists. On its Web site, the Lincoln Group has noted its "thriving network of offices" in Iraq and its working relationships with "over 300 Iraqi journalists." Mr. Di Rita acknowledged that parts of the Lincoln contract were classified, specifically procedures dealing with Iraqi personnel. Revealing the identities of Iraqis working for Lincoln or details of their work with the Americans could threaten their safety, he said. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/03/politics/03propaganda.html?pagewanted=print

American Christian Fundamentalist Leader Calls For Global War By Yoginder Sikand 11/18/05 "Countercurrents" -- -- If Christian fundamentalists are to be believed, America's invasion of Iraq and the consequent brutal slaughter of thousands of innocent civilians in that country are all part of a grand divine plan that will finally culminate in the 'second coming' of Jesus Christ. Establishing an empire that will extend all over the globe, Christ will rule like a powerful monarch, saving those who believe in him and dispatching non-believers, all non-Christians and non-conformist Christians, to everlasting perdition in hell. This is no childish nonsense for millions of Christian fundamentalists, who sincerely believe this to be predicted in the Bible. Not surprisingly, American Christian fundamentalists are today among the most fanatic supporters of Bush's global imperialist wars, in Iraq and elsewhere, which they see as in keeping with the divine mandate. They are no eccentric or lunatic fringe elements, for today Christian fundamentalists exercise a powerful influence in American politics. Among them is George Bush himself, who insists that the American invasion of Iraq has been sanctioned by God, with whom he claims to be in personal communication. While the Western press is awash with stories, real and exaggerated, about 'Islamic fundamentalists', rarely is mention made about Christian fundamentalists, who, with their vast resources and close links with the current American administration, are a potentially more menacing threat than their Muslim counterparts. According to newspaper reports more than a third of Americans are associated with one or the other Christian fundamentalist outfit, most of which are fiercely anti-communist, anti-Muslim and are passionate advocates of free-market capitalism, global American hegemony and the myth of the civilizing mission of white America. In recent years, these fundamentalist groups have been engaged in aggressive missionary work in other countries as well, including in the so-called 'Third World'. Fired by a passionate hatred for other religions, which they dismiss as 'false' and even 'Satanic', they are today among the most well-funded missionary groups in large parts of Asia and Africa. Crusading for Christ, these fundamentalist groups are not simply out fishing for souls. Rather, for them Christianity is only part of the agenda, which also includes aggressively promoting American and Zionist interests. Today, these groups preach not only Christ but also Pax Americana and even American-led imperialist wars, which they bless as holy causes to usher in the final arrival of Jesus. Texas-based author and preacher Michael Evans is one of the most notorious American Christian fundamentalist preachers today, a passionate advocate of war in the name of Christ. In a recently published book, titled 'Beyond Iraq: The Next Move-Ancient Prophecy and Modern-Day Conspiracy Collide' (Whitestone Books, Florida, 2003), he spells out a grand design for American global hegemony, blessed in the guise of a holy global war. Key players in this 'divine' plot include the CIA, the American government and army, and Israel, besides various Christian fundamentalist outfits. The book is dedicated, among others, to what Evans describes as 'two old friends', Ehud Olmert, former Israeli Vice President, and the former Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. Equally revealingly, the book begins with a quotation which graces the lobby of the original headquarters of the CIA. Evans is no petty crank who claims to be God-possessed, although his writings might seem to suggest that. The jacket of the book describes him as a 'TIME magazine best-selling author', who has appeared on the BBC and on American television channels and who has written for such papers as the Wall Street Journal and the Jerusalem Post. He hobnobs with the highest of American and Israeli politicians and religious leaders, and is evidently taken very seriously in Christian fundamentalist circles. That Evans is also a passionate Bush-backer is amply evident in his clam that, 'I know, from a first hand, personal interview with him that Bush is a man of faith who believes in the Bible'. Evans is the founder of the 'Jerusalem Prayer Team', which, he says, he established after having been visited by God in a vision. Among those who participated in the inauguration of his outfit were such names as Franklin Graham, Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, all notorious American Christian fundamentalist leaders, Governor Dick Perry and Representative Dick Armey, and Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli Prime Minister. Thousands of others in America and elsewhere, so he claims, have joined his movement in the aftermath of 11 September, 2001. His ultimate aim, he writes, is to have one million 'intercessors praying daily for the peace of Jesus and God's protection for Israel' so that 'demonic powers will be defeated by holy angels in a battle that cannot be seen with the natural eye'. A fierce Christian Zionist, Evans has close links with the Israeli establishment. The book's jacket states that he received the 'Ambassador Award' from the government of Israel and relates that he has been 'a confidante to most of Israel's prime ministers and to both of Jerusalem's mayors'. The jacket quotes Benjamin Netanyahu as praising Evans for having 'consistently demonstrated the moral clarity that is necessary to defend Israel from the lies and distortions of its enemies'. This is no empty boast: the book contains pictures of Evans with Menachem Begin endorsing his first book, 'Israel: America's Key To Survival', praying with Shimon Peres, comforting Jewish victims of a bomb blast in Israel, launching the 'Jerusalem Prayer Team' along with Jerusalem's mayor, pledging support to Israel before Yitzhak Shamir along with half a million signatures of fellow Christians, championing Israel's cause at the royal palace in Madrid and keeping company with American soldiers in Lebanon and Somalia. * Christianity, War and the 'Defence' of Israel For Evans, and numerous other rabid Christian fundamentalist preachers of hate like him, one of the most crucial purposes of America's invasion of Iraq is the 'defence' of Israel, which he regards as a solemn Christian duty. If till recently Jews were routinely reviled by the Church as 'Christ-killers', and, accordingly, hounded by Christian authorities, many of today's Christian fundamentalists, like Evans, are passionate advocates of the state of Israel. This does not, however, represent any shift in their fervent belief, intrinsic to mainstream Christianity, that non-Christians, Jews included, are destined for Hell. Rather, it is part of a wider conversion agenda. Jesus, they believe, will return to the world to rule only once the Jews have 'returned' to Palestine and have rebuilt the temple of David that was destroyed almost two thousand years ago. After this momentous event, many Jews will convert to Christianity and those who refuse to will be sent to hell. Till then, Christian fundamentalists argue, the Jews and their state must be passionately defended from their 'enemies', who are invariably identified as Arabs and Muslims. The 'defence' of Israel, a central point in the Christian fundamentalist agenda, is typically argued in racist terms. Israel, Christian fundamentalists believe, are God's 'chosen people', and they quote the Bible as making this claim, suggesting, therefore, that non-Jewish peoples are somehow lesser beings. Evans, too, makes this point and argues that according to the Bible 'God will bless those who bless Israel' and will 'curse those who curse it'. 'History records', he says, 'that God deals with nations in accordance with how those nations deal with Israel'. Hence, in the 'defence' of Israel, Christians, Evans argues, have no choice. If they are true to their faith, he says, they must join hands with America in its war for 'defending' Israel, and must 'support Israel in every possible way'. 'We must either choose Mount Zion [Jerusalem] and be among those who obey the voice of the Spirit of the Lord', he writes, 'or we will be left to the passions of our flesh, drinking the wine of her [bablyon's or Iraq's] fornication'. The invasion of Iraq, and the broader American 'war on terror', is, Evans says, is akin to 'divine light [.] proclaiming like a trumpet a spiritual battle of monumental proportions', pitting Babylon, the Biblical Iraq, the 'spiritual centre of darkness', against Jerusalem or contemporary Israel, the 'spiritual centre of light'. But so that this 'divine light' should spread beyond the confines of Babylon, Evans pleads for America to extend its war all over the globe, to every country that dares to challenge American supremacy and the state of Israel. This war, he says, should aim at the elimination of all 'terrorists', defined as those who refuse to support Israeli and American interests. In this, the invasion and occupation of Iraq is of vital importance, Evans says, because it will 'become a US base' to destroy 'terrorist' networks elsewhere in the Middle East and eventually to usher in what he calls 'the apocalyptic battle' of Armageddon, 'the final battles of the ages' as allegedly 'prophesied in Daniel, Jeremiah and Revelations', chapters of the Bible. America, as Evans sees it, must be ready to sacrifice itself to protect Israel, because that, he says, is precisely what the Christian God wants. Hence, Palestinians resisting the illegal occupation of their land and all those who opposed to Israel and its imperialist and expansionist policies must be crushed with the might of American arms, he insists. The Christian God does not brook any peace with such people, he argues. The Bible, he announces, says that those who fight against Israel, God's supposedly chosen people and recipients of His 'special blessing', would be destroyed by God Himself. He quotes the Bible as declaring: 'And this shall be the plague with which the Lord will strike all the people who fought against Jerusalem: Their flesh shall dissolve while they stand on their feet. Their eyes shall dissolve in their sockets. And their tongues shall dissolve in their mouths'. Given this supposed divine backing, Evans exhorts America to invade and subjugate all countries opposed to Israel, specifically naming Lebanon, Syria and Iran. The ultimate agenda, he says, is to destroy these countries and establish what Zionists call Eretz or Greater Israel, extending to and including Iraq. This is because, Evans quotes the Bible as saying, God allegedly gave this vast stretch of land, from the Nile to the Euphrates, to Abraham and his son Isaac and his descendants, ancestors of the Jews, as a covenant and as their 'everlasting possession'. Echoing hardliner Zionists, Evans insists that there can be no peace with the Palestinians at any cost, because, he claims, the Christian God is opposed to this. If Israel and America are to faithfully abide by the Christian God's will, he says, they must not let anything get in the way of the establishment of Eretz Israel. Thus, various peace proposals that involve any territorial concessions on the part of Israel are ruled out. This is because, as Evans alleges, God has given the entire territory to the Jews till eternity. Christianity and the New Anti-Muslim Crusade As for the Arabs and Muslims more generally, Evans seems to suggest that the Christian God desires that they be humiliated, subjugated and crushed. Thus, he quotes the Bible as saying that while God specially blessed Isaac and his descendants, the Jews, he had a different plan in mind for the Arabs, descendants of Ishmael, Abraham's other son. Referring to Ishmael Evans quotes the Bible as saying, 'He will be a wild man; His hand shall be against every man and every man's hand against him'. This racist stereotype, so deeply rooted in traditional Christian discourse about Muslims, is held by Evans to be what he calls 'a fitting description of the Arab terrorist' and, presumably, as justifying the annihilation of the Arab people, as well as other Muslims. Evans goes so far in vilifying Arabs and Muslims as to call Muhammad a proto-terrorist, alleging that he had banished and killed Jews for not believing in him. 'Terrorism', he claims, is a logical consequence of Islam, and he argues that 'Muhammad set a sordid example for his present-day disciples, the Qadafis, Khomeinis, Arafats and bin Ladens and Husseins of this world'. Claiming knowledge of the unseen, he even announces that Islam is 'a malevolent manifestation of a religion conceived in the pit of hell'. Evans thus equates Islam with the forces of the 'Anti-Christ', against whom he appeals to Christians to marshal all the resources at their command. Ironically, while spewing hatred and calling for a global war, he presents Christianity as peace-loving, contrasting it with Islam, which he equates with 'terrorism'. 'Christianity differs from Islam as day differs from night', he claims, completely unmindful of the sordid and blood-soaked history of the faith he claims to champion. In the same breath as he issues a general summons to Christians to wage war in the name of their faith he refers to the Bible as instructing Christians to 'turn the other cheek' when slapped, in order to argue that, unlike Christianity, Islam is an inherently vile religion, equating it with what he terms 'the law of the bullet, militancy, treachery, terrorism and violence'. Christianity, America and Oil Christian fundamentalists are ardent advocates of free-market capitalism, having played a key role in America's war against communism during the Cold War. Christ, capitalism and American supremacy go together, Evans believes, and so, while announcing that an American-spearheaded global war is precisely what Christ mandates, he approvingly quotes Isser Harel, founder of the Israeli secret services' organization Mossad, who speaks of the 'terror' threat to America's 'freedom', 'capitalism' and 'power', and exhorts America to take appropriate defence measures. Evans goes so far as to advise the America to capture all the oil wealth in Arab lands in order to prevent 'terrorists' from using oil wealth to target Israel, home to God's supposedly 'special people'. A more ingenuous excuse to justify American greed could hardly be devised! Since Muslims, especially the Arabs, are branded virtually as agents of the Devil, Evans argues that America, as self-appointed agent of Christ, should have no qualms about invading oil-rich Arab lands. This would, he says, break America's dependence on Muslim countries for oil which. If America seizes all Arab oil-fields, it would, he says, sharply reduce oil prices, forcing Muslim countries 'to their knees', giving them only two options: 'cooperate with the war on terror or go bankrupt'. At the same time as he exhorts America to invade and occupy all the countries, no matter what the human cost, Evans warns that it should not be serious about its rhetoric of exporting 'democracy' to the Middle East, for, he argues, it would lead to anti-American and anti-Israeli Islamists taking over. * Invasion of Iraq and the Ushering in of Global Christendom and Pax-Americana Evans sees America's invasion and occupation of Iraq as the unfolding of a divine plan for the world. It is not nothing less than what he calls a grand 'spiritual battle', between Christianity and Satanic forces and 'demons', as represented by Muslims and other non-Christians. Accordingly, he fervently welcomes America's invasion of Iraq and pleads that America should expand the theatre of war by invading various other, mostly Muslim, countries. The murder and destruction that America has wrought in Iraq is nothing to grieve about, Evans seems to suggest. It is a price, he argues, that God is supposedly exacting from Muslims for having been 'coerced' by Satan to 'loathe' the Jews, 'God's Chosen People'. It is also a divine punishment, he says, for Iraq having allegedly possessing 'deadly chemical, biological or nuclear weapons', echoing the bogus claim made by Bush, Blair and their henchmen which they used to justify their invasion of that country. Weak-hearted Christians who might disagree are advised to all in line, for, Evans says, this is precisely what the Bible predicts and what God mandates. 'I will raise against Babylon an assembly of great nations from the north country, for she has sinned against God', the Jewish prophet Jeremiah is said to have announced, and Evans takes this as evidence of his claim that the American invasion of Iraq is demanded by God and that all America is doing is to faithfully follow God's will. Iraq, the Biblical Babylon, Evans insists, represents the forces of Satan, and hence deserves to be crushed by America, God's agent, through invasion and war. 'Babylon is fallen, that great city, because she has made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication', he quotes the Bible as saying. 'I will rise up against them [.] I will cut off from Babylon her name and survivors, her offspring and descendants [.] I will turn her into a place for owls and into swampland. I will sweep her with the broom of destruction', Evans quotes the Biblical God as having declared. He marshals other Biblical verses to press the argument about Iraq being allegedly inherently 'evil' and hence deserving harsh repression at American hands. Eve and Adam are said to have committed the 'first sin' there; it was in Iraq that occult and astrology were invented; Nebuchadnezzar, ruler of Babylon, conquered Israel and enslaved the Jews; the Babylonians built the Tower of Babel, thereby defying God by trying to reach heaven without His permission; and the Bible describes Babylon as the 'seat' of the Anti-Christ and the 'Beast', the 'seat of Satan's evil', in contrast to Jerusalem, the 'seat of God's righteousness', against whom it is destined to be pitted in the final battle that will usher in Jesus' 'second coming'. In all, then, Evan argues, America is simply acting as the Christian God's handmaiden in wreaking destruction and death in Iraq. Instead of being blamed or castigated for this, he argues, it should be praised. This destruction is Biblically mandated, he repeats, for the Bible has announced that, 'Babylon, the great, has fallen and has become a dwelling place of demons, a prison for every foul spirit, and a cage for every unclean and hated bird [.] Therefore, her plague will come in one day-death and mourning and famine. And she will be utterly burned with fire [.] Thus with violence the great city Babylon shall be thrown down and shall not be found anymore'. But this terrible destruction in Iraq is only the beginning of a bloody trail of events mandated by a supposedly blood-thirsty and vengeful God. According to Evans' reading of the Bible, the American invasion of Iraq is what he calls 'the dress-rehearsal' for the grand global battle of Armageddon between the forces of Christ and Satan. Prior to this battle, he quotes the Bible as saying, 'demons and spirits' bound up in the Euphrates in Iraq will be released, and, with an army of 200 million, will kill off a third of the world's total inhabitants through nuclear war. This grand battle, Evans writes, is not far off. Hence, he appeals to Christians to 'put on the armour of God' and 'engage in spiritual battle'. Now, is the time, he says, to prepare for the impending return of Christ. Presumably, after Iraq is destroyed through the agency of the Americans, Christ will suddenly appear in Jerusalem and establish his global empire, ushering in the end of the world as we know it. Horrendous as Evans' views are, they do find a powerful echo in Christian fundamentalist circles today, more so given their growing influence in policy-making circles in the West, particularly in America. If the world is to be saved from the Armageddon that Evans and his ilk are bent on calling down from the heavens it is imperative that Western imperialism and Christian fundamentalism be interrogated, challenged and opposed, particularly by sincere Christians themselves.

Because............. I like you. You're my friend. God forgive America

Translation: You would. All neocons defend criminal acts, then commit them. Go ahead. defend murder. Go on. defend a murderer. A murderer named George W. Bush Bush supporters are crimimals.

Bush Killed JFKjr. http://www.jfkii.com/home.html The report of the National Transportation Safety Board came out on August 8, 2000, 13 months after the plane crash of JFK Jr. It contradicts many of the lies pushed in the media. For example, the L.A. Times reported “The accident that killed Kennedy was caused by an inexperienced pilot …the NTSB concluded in its final report†(LA TIMES, 7/7/00, page 1). In fact, the NTSB report shows that Kennedy was highly experienced (he had more than enough hours for an instructor’s license), he was described by his trainers as “excellentâ€, “methodicalâ€, and “very cautious.†(NTSB report, page 3) The media say the visibility was poor. But the NTSB quotes the Tower manager at Martha’s Vineyard, where the plane went down, saying that there were “stars out†and visibility was “between 10 and 12 miles†(NTSB report, page 5). Why did the media lie? Why have they always lied about the murder of his father? Was John Kennedy Jr. murdered? Judge for yourself. 1) the rescue: This is enormously important. FAA radar tracked Kennedy’s plane crash. The U.S. Coast Guard has reported that Kennedy contacted the tower on his final approach. THIS IS ENORMOUSLY IMPORTANT!!! It means they would have known his plane was going down before it hit the water. FAA regulations require that a search begin immediately when a plane reports itself on final approach and does not land within 5 minutes. Yet it took them 14½ hours to send the first planes and boats to Martha’s Vineyard. (Boston Herald, 7/20/99 “Time gaps in early hours of search are beyond explanation†Jack Sullivan and David Talbot) (LINK5)WHY? 2) the plane: Kennedy’s plane had autopilot, capable of flying itself to within 100 feet of the airport. All a “cautious and methodical†pilot had to do was sit back and let the plane fly itself. (NTSB report, page 18) 3) the sabotage: Kennedy’s plane had a black box. No other private non-jet plane on earth had one. He knew they wanted to kill him and he wanted to make it hard. The NTSB, says the battery had been removed, destroying all record of conversation in the cockpit. (NTSB page 10) All planes have an Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT), which sends out a beacon signal in case of a crash. It took 5 days to locate Kennedy’s plane. Why? Was it missing? Disabled? The report says nothing. According to the NTSB report, the fuel valve had been turned to OFF (NTSB report, page 12). This valve had a safety device on it so that it could not accidentally be turned to OFF. Turning it off during flight would be suicide, since at top speed, the engine will die in 45 seconds!! Because the results are potentially deadly, the valve cannot be turned by accident. A safety-release button must be pushed down and held while turning the valve. This piece of evidence is the smoking gun. It is positive proof of foul play. Was Kennedy committing suicide? If he wasn’t, there can scarcely be any question but that he was murdered. So who turned the valve? Read on. Kennedy’s flight logbook is missing. (NTSB report, page 2) This will be seen as critical in one minute, because the logbook would have recorded the presence of a flight instructor on the plane. The media talked about a “graveyard spiral†and various forms of disorientation. The NTSB report describes Kennedy’s plane making two mild explainable maneuvers; and then the plan plunged drastically to the right and plummeted straight down, crashing 2600 feet in 45 seconds. It sounds like someone grabbed the controls and suddenly shoved the plane into the water. But this description of a suicide plunge is consistent with the “suicide†position of the fuel valve. 4) the flight instructor: All of the early reports said there was a flight instructor on the plane (e.g. The New York Times, Saturday July 17, 1999). Then the flight instructor disappeared from the reports. Kennedy very rarely flew at night without a flight instructor. Out of 310 hours of flight time, and 55 hours at night, he had only 45 minutes at night without an instructor. (LINK12)He was very cautious. He had his wife on board. It is almost unthinkable that he would not have taken an instructor. 5) Egypt Air 990: Two months later Egyptian Air flight 990, with 30 of the highest ranking members of the Egyptian military on board, crashed. (It was big news for several days. The pilot’s family and the Egyptian government objected to the NTSB finding that the pilot was committing suicide. “He was happily married. Moslems don’t commit suicide†etc.) This pilot had walked into the cockpit, said “Allah help me’, grabbed the controls, and tried to force the plane to crash. Three other pilots, grabbed him, and there was a struggle; he gave up, turned around, and he turned the fuel valve OFF. Both pilots, Kennedy’s flight instructor and the Egyptian, were programmed, using hypnosis or other mind control, to act in exactly the same way. The CIA has settled lawsuits by victims of their mind control experiments, the MK Ultra program. One of the physicians, Dr. John Gittinger, Chief Psychologist of the CIA, tortured by his conscience, has come forward to expose the existence of these programs and their purpose: to create walking, pre-programmed human time bombs, set to go off on cue, taking out their intended victim. Kennedy’s emergency locator was removed, the cockpit recorder was disabled, the flight log was taken, and the body of the flight instructor was removed. (But they forgot to return the fuel valve to ON!!) They delayed the rescue 14 hours to do it. They were waiting in the water for the plane to crash. Who was? Who indeed? But why would anyone want to kill John Kennedy Jr.? He was planning to run for National office according to Newsweek and People. He told friends he would have run for Senate in New York, but let Hillary Clinton run instead. And he would have won. He was the most popular man in the US. And for good reason. He was a great guy. But he was the only Kennedy to ever acknowledge a conspiracy in his father’s death. He not only acknowledge it, he published an article by Oliver Stone, in his magazine, George, about assassination, conspiracies, and lying history books. Who would want to kill him? The people who killed his father had to kill him. Kennedy Jr. was going to go after them. So, who killed his father? George Herbert Walker Bush. There’s a ton of evidence at JFKII.com Here’s some. (If somebody tells you Lee Harvey Oswald did it, show them the Zapruder film. Abraham Zapruder was standing on the sidewalk filming when Kennedy got his brains blown out the back of the limousine. Oswald was in back. The shot had to have come from in front. It is very very obvious. You can find the Zapruder film at JFKII.com(LINK2ZAPRUDER) it’s in the last twenty minutes of the movie, JFK, and it is available for $20 at Amazon.com. Nobody can watch it with you and tell you Oswald acted alone! Try it.) Bush didn’t pull the trigger, but he supervised E. Howard Hunt, who did. 1) E. Howard Hunt: Hunt was the leader of the Watergate burglars, a band of CIA-funded Miami-based anti-Castro Cuban terrorists and assassins. In 1978, Spotlight magazine published an article saying that Hunt was in Dallas the day JFK died and had murdered Kennedy. Hunt sued and lost!! The jury decided he did it. (Mark Lane, Plausible Denial, 1991, Thundermouth Press, page 332) (LINK13) 2) 5 days after the Kennedy assassination, J Edgar Hoover, the head of the FBI, and signed a memo(LINk14, bushmemo.jpg), naming “George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency†as an apparent supervisor of the bands of CIA-funded Miami-based anti-Castro Cuban terrorists and assassins. Bush acknowledges the memo is real. The title of the memo is “Assassination of President John F. Kennedyâ€. Why would J. Edgar Hoover name it that? (LINK15) 3) George de Mohrenschildt was an important witness in the first Kennedy assassination. He got Lee Harvey Oswald the job in the School Book Depository. He was murdered the day he was supposed to testify about the assassination. Found in his phone book were George Bush’s name, and Bush’s company name.(LINK16) 4) There is every indication that Bush recruited Hunt for the Watergate burglaries. Bush set up the slush fund that paid $1,000,000 in bribes to the burglars, his friends contributed the money, and he laundered it.(LINK17) What about George W. Bush? Was he there? Kennedy’s plane went into the sea at 10:00 on Friday night, July 16, 1999. Bush was involved in a heated campaign, which he was losing in New Hampshire. He was constantly in public and constantly surrounded by reporters, so it’s easy to figure out where he was. Right? Wrong! According to the Omaha World Herald (7/17/99), on July 16th Bush was flipping pancakes Friday morning in Des Moines, but he boarded a bus and disappeared for the entire weekend. On Saturday, July 18th, reporters looking for a comment from Bush confronted a fumbling spokesperson who was unable to say when Bush would be available for comment. (Newsday, 7/19/99, A19) Bush finally called a press conference on Monday, to offer condolences. Do you think this evidence is too weak to accuse Bush of murder? As George would say, “We got more than enough here to hang a feller in Texas.†George, you’re our feller. TELL A FRIEND: BUSH IS A MONSTER: JFKII.com CONTACT US: mail@jfkii.com By involving himself in Kennedy’s murder, George W. Bush was living out the legacy of his father and his father’s father. George Bush Sr. has always denied that he ever worked for the CIA before 1976 when he became its director. But the direct and circumstantial evidence of his membership in the CIA is powerful and plentiful (that’s why this section is so long, sorry), and his reason for denying his membership is critical to understanding the enormity of his evil. George Bush Sr. was secretly active in the CIA 12 years before becoming the head of CIA. The evidence for that begins with his membership in Skull and Bones. Skull and Bones is a secret society on the Yale campus. Since the early part of this century, the men of the Bush family, have belonged. It is famous for its celebration of racism, deception, cowardice, and death: They meet, twice a week, in a tomb, to engage in black rituals using skulls, candles, and ceremonial group masturbation. Fun stuff. It's also a museum. George W's grandfather, Prescott Bush, led a group who raided Geronimo's grave. The skull is on display here. They also have Poncho Villa's skull. They target the heroes of the people. It is a very safe bet that they have JFK’s brain, which was stolen from the National Archives. They celebrate evil. Their graduate division, known as The Patriarchs, are powerful within the CIA, and much of the world. They are powerful devils. (The New Yorker, Nov. 27, 1989, page 108) http://www.rhombus.com/artvt/artvt/56skullandbones.htm It was through Skull and Bones, and his father’s connections, that George Bush Sr. was recruited to the CIA in 1960 or 1961. The idea for an organization like the CIA originated in 1945 with the recommendations of a War Department committee on post World War II intelligence. The Lovettt committee was chaired by Robert Lovett, a business partner and neighbor of Prescott Bush. In 1960, the head of the CIA was a close business associate of Prescott Bush, Alan Dulles. Dulles negotiated many agreements between Bush’s businesses and the Nazis. There are a number of warm letters between them (e.g. March 19, 1934; September 22, 1937, in the W. Averell Harriman papers in the Library of Congress). George Bush Sr.’s membership in Skull and Bones is relatively well-known (e.g. The New Yorker, Nov. 27, 1989, p.108) From 1948 on, the year George Sr. graduated, the CIA was hiring and promoting former Skull and Bones members as well as Nazi's. George Sr.’s father, Prescott Bush, was a Nazi (see below). So we have important evidence of a match between the hiring practices of CIA and the background of George Bush Sr. In 1960 former Skull and Bones member F.Trubee Davison was the director of personnel for CIA, and the idea that the personnel director (Davison) should hire an "old boy" (Bush) is cliché. But the relationship between Davison and Bush goes far beyond employer and employee. Davison's son, Endicott Peabody Davison, is also an attorney representing both Skull and Bones and the Bush family. Endicott was, according to The New Yorker, in Bush's Skull and Bones class of '48. So that the CIA hiring director could, through his son, do a more complete, intimate, and discrete background check on George Sr. than the FBI could ever provide. In fact, real power in the CIA is based upon these connections. Presidents come and go. They change their minds. They appoint new directors. But they exercise no real control over the CIA. The men the presidents appoint as directors of the CIA are front men who have no real idea what is going on in the field. The real backbone of the CIA is rooted in these family and old school ties. Under these circumstances, you cannot easily name anyone more qualified for a leadership role in the CIA than George Bush Sr. George Bush Sr. helped supervise the CIA’s disastrous invasion of Cuba at the Bay of Pigs. Again, George Sr. denies that he was in the CIA during the Bay of Pigs. It is a transparent lie. In 1960, the CIA was planning the invasion of Cuba at the Bay of Pigs. The Deputy Director at CIA supervising the Bay of Pigs operation was Richard Bissell, who was a former employee of Averell Harriman, Prescott Bush’s old boss. Bissell’s older brother William was Skull and Bones. (Corn, David; Blond Ghost, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994, p.69) According to Nicholas King's authorized biography of George Bush Sr., Bush's oil company, Zapata Off-Shore oil, was concentrating its business in the Caribbean and off South America, at the same time and in the same area that the Miami-based anti-Castro CIA-funded paramilitary groups were active. In 1957 Zapata was drilling forty miles off the coast of Cuba. No CIA front could have provided a better cover for the supervisor of these CIA activities. In 1959 the Bush family bought out George’s partner in Zapata Offshore, giving George Sr. exclusive (and therefore covert) control of its activities. The CIA code name for the operation at the Bay of Pigs was: ZAPATA. Whether Bush's oil company is named for the operation, or the operation is named for the oil company, is of little importance. The important question is “What kind of idiot would name his CIA operation after his cover, or his cover after his operation?†George Bush would. During WWII Bush was a pilot. He named his first plane after his wife: the Barbara. He named his second plane after his wife: the Barbara II. (George Bush and Victor Gold, Looking Forward, (New York: Doubleday, 1987), p.36 ) But that’s not all. Col. L. Fletcher Prouty was chief of special operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, charged with the military support of clandestine operations of the CIA. He was responsible for securing weapons and two US Navy craft suitable for carrying men and weapons to the invasion at the Bay of Pigs. The ships were sent to an inactive Navy Base in North Carolina where the CIA took over repainting them to disguise their US Navy origins. According to Col. Prouty, new names were painted on the ships for their historic mission: the “Barbara†and the “Houstonâ€, Bush’s wife and his new home town. (Prouty, quoted by Marc Lane, Plausible Denial, (New York: Thunder Mouth’s Press, 1992), p.332 a must read!) As we mention above, Bush not only supervised E. Howard Hunt and his band of Cubans at the Bay of Pigs, he did it again during the assassination of JFK in Dallas, and he supervised them during Watergate. From the time of the JFK assassination on, George Bush Sr. was a “Made†man. From that point on, he lived a charmed political life, getting bailed out of every failure, being constantly picked up and set back on the road to the White House. Membership in the CIA, or even Skull and Bones, does not explain the extraordinary events of Bush's political career, events that indicate support from an invisible and sinister power elite. George Bush Sr. became the Harris County Republican party chairman in 1962. It might be considered a useless provocation to observe that Hitler was an agent of German army intelligence when he was sent to organize the Nazi party (information which is available on Microsoft Encarta). Except that the same wealthy family, (Thyssen) that helped to create Hitler and financed his rise to power was intimately connected with the Bush family. So that for George Bush to be working for the CIA and the Republican party at the same time would not be particularly original; and perhaps even predictable, given his family ties, and the wholesale recruitment of former Nazi intelligence operatives into the CIA at the end of WWII. In 1963, weeks before the JFK assassination, Bush announced for the Senate. He won the Republican nomination for Senate, but lost the general election. That might have been the end of his political career. But in 1966, the darkest and most evil political figure in recent history (except for Bush), Richard Nixon intervened in Texas politics and helped secure Bush's nomination for a congressional district so solidly Republican he could not lose (according to that radical font of conspiratorial rantings, Microsoft Encarta). How would Nixon, the two time loser from California, have even known Bush, who by his own account had spent the previous fifteen years running around the Caribbean? How do they connect? And why should Nixon choose to help Bush in a fight with other Republicans for the party nomination? These are reasonable questions. Nixon was touring the country in 1966, attempting to secure the support of the right-wing power elites for his 1968 presidential campaign. That is, he was selling himself; promising to be the loyal servant of the darkest forces on the planet. So, the apparent connection between Bush and Nixon in 1963, is that Nixon wanted to prove the value of his services to these dark forces, and those dark forces wanted Bush promoted. So Nixon promoted Bush. But why? What had Bush had done to earn the commitment of those dark forces to his political ascension? It's a fair question. And it is a question that will come up over and over again. Because Bush AGAIN ran for Senate in 1970 and AGAIN he lost. And again Nixon resurrected him, this time making Bush United Nations ambassador, and then ambassador to China. With no credentials. With no proven abilities except as a loser. Why? Again, common sense demands an explanation of what Bush had done to earn the commitment of those dark forces to his political ascension., despite all the failings in his career. The obvious answer is that he played a sufficiently important role in the JFK assassination to win acceptance by a real dark power elite. This is supported, as we have seen, by a wealth of information. One solution answers all questions. George Bush Sr. killed Kennedy Sr. as his initiation into this dark circle of devils. The devils promised him he would be president of the USA. They didn’t lie. Let's talk about initiation into inner circles. If I am going to let you into my super secret society of killers, where we are going to reveal our darkest secrets and discuss our future and past crimes, your initiation has to include committing a crime at least as serious as what you’re going to learn about us; so that we have as much on you as you will have on us. Two-way blackmail is no mail. Bush killed Kennedy. They made him president. You may have noticed that George Bush Jr. has, since the death of JFK Jr., led a similarly charmed life. Despite his stunning lack of experience, despite his drug and alcohol-ridden past, despite his previous losses in his first run for congress and then in New Hampshire, despite an opponent in John McCain who is incomparably strong where Bush is weakest, despite all his personal and intellectual failings, George Bush Jr. is clearly the anointed candidate of a fabulously wealthy power elite. But again, why was it worth hundreds of millions of dollars to support Bush over McCain? What could he have done to win such commitment from the dark forces of oil, tobacco, and guns? WHAT??? How’s this for an answer? He did the same thing his dad did to win a charmed political life: He helped kill a Kennedy. Bush Sr. killed JFK Sr. in order to prove himself a true fascist and worthy of the support of wealthiest fascists in this country. George Jr. was required to do likewise. More Bush and CIA When he was vice-president, Bush surrounded himself with CIA “experts†in mass murder. He could have surrounded himself with naked interns. It was a choice. He made it. It counts. It has meaning. Donald Gregg, Oliver North, and Felix Rodriguez worked out of Bush’s office and answered directly to him. They supervised a wild campaign of murder, sabotage, and terror against the civilian populations of Nicaragua, Honduras, and El Salvador, slaughtering hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, including Jesuit priests, nuns, and archbishop Romero. This is really no small point. Donald Gregg, Felix Rodriguez, and Oliver North, were all veteran CIA officers from Operation Phoenix in Vietnam. Operation Phoenix involved snatching, virtually at random, a “suspected†communist sympathizer from the population, and interrogating them to death. CIA admits that no one ever survived these interrogations. Any one or any village that a “suspect†named while being tortured would become the new “suspect.†Bush not only brought these butchers to Central America, he brought them to the White House and installed them in his office. Bush claimed he was “out of the loop†of Iran-Contra (ridiculous!). However, Bush’s appointment calendar revealed 17 scheduled meetings with Felix Rodriguez. Neither Bush nor anyone else at CIA can explain the intimacy of the relationship between these two men. They cannot explain it, because their relationship developed during the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion, when Bush was Rodriguez's immediate supervisor. To explain the relationship would be to expose Bush's perjury, when he testified before Congress in 1974 that he had never been in the CIA. In this case, the smoking gun of the Hoover memo resolves a major enigma in the circumstances surrounding Bush's vice-presidential relationship with Felix Rodriguez: they were war buddies from the Bay of Pigs, if not from the Kennedy assassination. POINTS OF INTEREST Who is the CIA? Not all rich people are completely evil. They don’t all see mass murder of the population as an acceptable option when poor hard working people demand justice. However, the multi-billionaires who control the CIA are clearly fascist. And who are they? Probably the best way to get a true answer is to ask, “Who does the CIA serve?†For example, who was the CIA working for when they overthrew Mossadeq, the popularly elected President of Iran in 1952, and replaced him with a king? Whose interests were the CIA serving? Not the democratic people of the United States. Certainly not the people of Iran. They were working for Standard Oil and Chase Manhattan Bank, which is to say that they were working for the Rockefeller family, which controls both. They wanted to control the oil and they did. At an enormous cost to the people of Iran. . Who's interests were the CIA serving when they overthrew the President of Guatemala in 1952, and replaced him with a bloody military dictatorship? United Fruit company, largely owned by the Rockefellers. When the CIA killed the President of the United States, who were they working for? They were working for devils. And every time we let them get away unpunished, we pay an enormous price. America has been haunted by a murderously evil specter for at least 40 years. JFK was murdered, 80% of the American people think it was a conspiracy, but we can't do anything about bringing the murderers to justice. Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, and Bobby Kennedy were murdered, but no one who studies the facts can conclude that the murderers have been brought to justice. There are mountains of credible evidence that the CIA flew plane-loads of cocaine into the US and funneled it into the inner city. But no one has even been investigated, although hundreds of thousands of Black and Latino street dealers and users are rotting in prison. It is time to drive a stake through the heart of the dark family of vampires that have been sucking the life-blood of America. This article is a step in that direction. What can I do? Buy a T-shirt. Tell your friends to to to JFKII.com or KillingGeorgeBush.com. Buy them a T-shirt Note from the editor: I accepted the idea that both parties were the same back in 1968. So I refused to help Herbert Humphrey get elected. I sat back and watched Nixon win. And then I watched him wage ware against the civilian population of Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. 1,000,000 dead. I refused to help Carter and sat back and watched Reagan win. And watched him wage a massive war of extermination on the civilians of Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. 100,000 dead at least. I sat back in 1988 and watched Bush win, and watched him wage a drug war on the black and brown people of Los Angeles, flying it in cocaine in transport planes, directing it into the inner city, training the dropouts to make crack factories, and driving the murder rate up ten times. The murder rate is down 90%. I like it that way. 2,000,000 are in prison. But I’m not sitting back. Gore may not be the guy you want but he’s not a demon from hell. And if you sit back and let him win, don’t let me find out, ‘cause I’m gonna be pissed. George W. Bush’s grandfather, Prescott Bush, was associated with Nazis and Nazi-supporters in nearly every aspect of his life and work. Before and during WWII, Prescott worked so closely with the Nazi banking establishment that on November 7, 1942, his assets were seized under the "Trading With the Enemy Act", as Nazi assets. That is, the federal government determined that he was working so closely for the Nazis that stock held in Bush’s name, and the entire company for which he was the director, were Nazi assets. The order specified: “all of which shares are held for the benefit of ...members of the Thyssen family.†(Office of Alien Property Custodian Vesting Order Number 248, signed by Leo T. Crowley, Alien Property Custodian, executed October 20, 1942; F.R.Doc. 42-11568; filed November 6, 1942. 7 Fed. Reg. 9097 (November 7, 1942) Cited in The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush found at http://www.padrak.com/alt/BUSHBOOK.html The Thyssens were the earliest and most enthusiastic of Hitler’s supporters, aiding him even before he was the leader of the Nazi party. (Fritz Thyssen, “I Paid Hitlerâ€, 1941, reprinted in Port Washington, N.Y.: Kennikat Press, 1972. p.133) There are real forces of evil in the US. They helped bring Hitler to power. And Prescott Bush, George W’s grandfather, was right in the middle of the plans to create Hitler. The history of the robbers barons that the Bushes serve is almost ridiculously evil. They were war profiteers during the Civil War. General Custer, who was a genuine hero of that war, was, under their influence, diverted from fighting for democracy in Mexico and sent to slaughter Native Americans for the benefit of the mining and railroad interests. They turned machine guns on American women and children during the Homestead strike. Recent scholarship (available in nearly any recent-edition encyclopedia) has revealed that while Hitler was in the army, he was recruited by German army intelligence as a secret agent. He was sent to school and taught anti-Semitism (He had to be taught since his father was half Jewish. This is not radical scholarship. It is the most basic stuff.) and given intensive speech lessons. He was then sent to organize the Nazi party. Fritz Thyssen, the German industrialist who paid for all of this, was conducting intimate conferences with Averell Harriman at this time. Harriman was not only a fabulously wealthy banker, he was also the employer of Prescott Bush (and later, his son George Bush Sr.), as well as Allan Dulles, the future founding head of the CIA. And he put all of them to work helping finance the Nazis. The Duponts, Rockefellers, Fords, and Harrimans were huge in establishing the racist eugenics movement in this country, directly providing Hitler with pre-fabricated racist propaganda supported with phony “science.†While people were literally starving in England, France, and the USA, General Motors, Ford, and Standard Oil built factories in Nazi Germany, which gave an enormous artificial boost to the Nazi economy, allowed Hitler to appear an “economic geniusâ€, and all of them cranked out war materiel at top speed. Hard to believe? You ain't heard nothin' yet. The Rockefellers, through their German subsidiary, funded the elite SS from its birth and into 1944, while the SS was supervising mass murder at the death camps. There are numerous references to the fact that Hitler feared the SS. And with good cause. Shortly after Hitler came to power, the SS wiped out the leadership of the Brown Shirts, Hitler’s oldest friends and supporters, his working class henchmen. Hitler survived at the pleasure of the SS. And whose interests was Hitler serving when he allowed the SS set up the death camps? Not the Nazi's. Transporting Jews was a serious detriment to the war effort. The amount of resources, coal in particular, consumed in firing the ovens, is astounding. It is unthinkable that Hitler would begin diverting such resources at the very time when it first appeared that he might lose the war. If he won the war, he could dispose of the Jews at his leisure. But he jeopardized the war effort. Why? After displaying apparent "genius" in his rise to power, rebuilding a destroyed economy and war machine, and conquering most of Europe, he suddenly went nuts? Here's a hint. According to the L.A. Times of 5/15/99, the Paris offices of Chase Manhattan Bank (the Rockefellers) "froze Jewish accounts before the Nazis ordered them to do so." The Rockefellers advised Hitler to “order†them to freeze the assets, and Hitler complied. And when the Jews died, the banks and insurance companies kept the billions of dollars these Jewish people had invested. So what did Hitler get out of the costly extermination? Well, he got to avoid being murdered being murdered by the Rockefeller funded SS like the rest of his comrades in the Brown Shirts. And on top of that he either got a) nothing, or the Rockefellers (owners of Chase Manhattan and Standard Oil and Mobil, and partners with IG Farben at Auschwitz), and their fellow Nazis in the USA, promised that in return for the Holocaust, they would use their influence over the US government and the military to prevent an invasion of Europe for nearly two and one-half years. Which they did. The only evidence for that “promise†is circumstantial. But how else do you explain Hitler’s suddenly insane diversion of resources, his sudden reversal of his ten-year old policy of deporting Jews (actually, deportations continued on up to the very end of the war), and the 2.5 year delay by the US in invading Europe?? As mentioned above, Standard Oil’s contributions to the Nazi war effort were absolutely vital. After Roosevelt’s death, these monsters took control of the State department, the military, and the CIA. (Charles Higham, Trading With the Enemy, N.Y.: Delacorte Press, 1983, pp. 20-22) (Anthony Sutton, “Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler†(Seal Beach: ’76 Press, 1976) Hitler literally could not have made war without the help of his allies/creators in America. Hitler received enormous, indispensable, and really unbelievable support from the most powerful elements in the country including Ford, Dupont, and GM. The Rockefellers’ Standard Oil provided Hitler's war machine with a patent for synthetic rubber, which was kept secret from the US military even after Pearl Harbor. The US was desperate for such a formula. Standard Oil provided the Nazi's with numerous other patents critical to their war effort, and owned a half-interest in the death camp at Auschwitz, together with their partner, IG Farben. A 1943 IG Farben special report pointed out that without the gasoline additive tetraethyl supplied by Standard Oil, “the war effort would have been impossible.†(Charles Higham, Trading With the Enemy, N.Y.: Delacorte Press, 1983, p.216)"This is not Copyrighted in U.S. or anywhere’s else, and anybody caught usin’ it without our permission, will be mighty good friends of ourn, cause we don't give a dern. Publish it. Write it. Sing it. Swing to it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that's all we wanted to do."

I know you are but what am I?

Translation: YOU ARE A POOR EXCUSE FOR A MOD! Fucking mongoloid. Shut the fuck up and resign you cunt.

At least you're admitting you're a fascist nazi.

Translation: You bring the fear upon yourself. What you are truely afraid of is patriotic American people who expose him of his lies and criminal acts and those who defend his criminal acts and lies. Nobody believes him anymore. Nobody believes the propaganda his lapdogs spread around like a cancer. The cancer is getting removed and we the patriotic america loving people, unlike yourself are the chemotherapy. We are giving the country the "medical attention" it truely needs and that is to expose Bush for his lies and push to have him removed by impeachment because we the majority who now oppose Bush are the surgeons who will remove the cancer. Oh, by the way Bush no longer has the majority behind him when only 34% of the American people, including YOU are what's left of what little support he has. http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB113216347138199155-5Z1Ri_om8ITUbV_jD2bx6maguMY_20061116.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top And it just keeps plummeting. There's no chance for recovery this time. The damage is done. Keep defending a treasonous war criminal. Nobody's stopping ya. You can't intimidate me Billy. I'm not Jeremy Glick, Billy.

Is that how your mother gave birth to you?

It's not the governments business telling the press what they can report. Freedom of the press is a wonderful thing but unfortunately, that's too good for criminally insane pro censorship republican extremists who hate freedom, therefore hate America. Republicans aren't Americans. Republicans hate America.

It's good to know you're only galvinazing the American people against Bush and his criminal war with that attitude. That same attitude when Bush accused congress of aiding the enemy cost him dearly in the polls. What were the numbers the last time I checked? Ah yes.... 34% job approval rating and falling fast. Should the "authorities" arrest the majority who oppose Bush for "treason"? I'm still here. Your attempt out of total desperation failed. Having an opinion isn't treason. Disagreeing with your king isn't treason either. Announcing there is to be no criticism of your king, not criticism of the events or to stifle the right to free speech and debate is treason. You hate free speech.. You hate freedom. You see, the "authorities" laughed it out. Nothing for them to go on. They didn't persue it, knowing they would get reamed in court. And for treason, that is a charge congress imposes and is tried by congress, at least that's what it said the last time I read the constitution. The same constituition you would rather throw into the inceninerator since you hate it so much. The both of you hate freedom, therefore hate America and is the true danger to this country. It is you who is defending criminal acts. The criminal acts of a lying out of control president and you would even go as far as defend his criminal acts by inflicting criminal acts on those who disagree with both you and him. Not surprising what criminal acts republican extremists would do to defend the crimes of their leader. You prefer dictatorship over democracy. Hitler would be proud of you. You are a waste of bandwidth. You are a fucking dickwart, an asshat, assfinger, fuckwad, imbecillic blowhard, a cocksmoking faggot etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc............... PS. YOU don't give a fuck about Rosa Parks.

Malikas la boca. ^^

You don't intimidate me, nor impress me. So when are you gonna avenge the death of your cousin by going to Iraq since you love quagmires so much? Take igloo with you. He could use a sexing up by you, fagboy. Fucking cock smoking beaner fag. Fucking retard. Get back on the banana boat, fucking cockroach. You fear me and you know it. L

They should've tie him to a chair, shot him up with truth syrum, and tortured him with electric shock treatment when he dodges questions by bolting for the door. /sarcasm We got the traitor on the run, obviously.