igloo Posted February 12 Report Share Posted February 12 Perfect description of some on this board, like jamirolost, marksimons, djxeno.The moron voteEmmett Tyrrell (archive)February 12, 2004 | Print | SendWASHINGTON, D.C. -- Readers of this column will remember, as apparently political scientists and pundits have not, that in the rancorous months before the Democratic primaries got underway, I identified that one dynamic new political constituency that would decide the winner. In years gone by, the dynamic constituency was the youth vote. And there was the year of the women's vote. This year as we watched Dr. Howard Dean gain the role of frontrunner, the veins in his neck bursting, his face an angry gnarl of sneers and grimaces, it became obvious that the dynamic new force in the Democratic primary was the moron vote. That is to say the angry, stupid, political neurotic who has proceeded into middle age convinced that the world is against him-her. These indignant morons saw Dr. Howard Dean tear off his suit coat, roll up his sleeves and approach the microphone as though he were about to chew on it, and they beheld Deliverance -- Deliverance from all the woe and perfidy that has held them back, given them lower-back pain, caused the seat of their pants to split the night they attended the professional wrestling match and brought George W. Bush to the throne. Of course, Dr. Howard Dean's ascendancy could not last. His anger was directed too widely. He threatened the Democratic hierarchy and even Terence McAuliffe, chairman of the Democratic National Committee and winner of three purple hearts, six silver stars and the Campfire Girls' Award for a Clean Tent. Suddenly, materials were being leaked from Dr. Howard Dean's past, the most significant being his mid-1990s letter to President Bill Clinton. That letter along with other leaked materials fatally weakened the frontrunner's hold on the moron vote. What is significant about that letter is that it clearly revealed the origin of all the other leaked materials -- to wit, the Clintons. They -- through their fund raising, their popularity with the Democratic rank and file, and their hand-picked chairman, the highly decorated war hero McAuliffe -- control the party. Dr. Howard Dean's reckless claims to "clean house" alarmed them. They recognized that with the new money and new dopes he was bringing into the party, he posed a threat to Hillary's presidential ambitions. Hence all those leaks emanating from Clinton servitors, particularly from the camp of Gen. Wesley Clark, the Clintons' stalking horse and yet another Democratic war hero. Now Sen. John Pierre Kerry is the frontrunner, and he has developed a fine ploy for corralling the moron vote. He and McAuliffe have stirred up this controversy about how frequently the president attended National Guard meetings three decades ago. And they have transformed their entire party into the most heroic congeries of patriots and GI Joes ever seen on earth. The morons are entranced. When Kerry first decided to make an issue of his Vietnam service surely there must have been a cautious advisor around to remind him of all the luridly compromising evidence on his record, evidence showing him to be a deeply flawed war hero. Anyone who remembers young John Kerry's prominence in antiwar and anti-American activities would caution him against making an issue of the easygoing George W. Bush's past. Yet Kerry is playing to the moron vote. He knows they need to be enflamed. Thus he has bemanured the military record of a guy who flew F-102s and whose flight instructor ranked him "in the top 5 percent of pilots I knew." Retired Col. Maurice H. Udell also ranked the president in the top 1 percent in the "thinking department." Will the evidence that the president served dutifully and was discharged honorably damage Kerry's candidacy? It certainly will not hurt him with the moron vote. It will not even hurt him if his public record on Vietnam and national security in general becomes an issue. In 1971, this antiwar veteran told Congress that our Army in Vietnam was committing "war crimes on a day-to-day basis" that included rape, torture and murder "reminiscent of Genghis Khan." Now he calls Vietnam veterans his "band of brothers." Nor will Kerry be hurt by his 1992 statement that "we do not need to divide America over who served and how" in Vietnam. (He was defending Bill Clinton, a draft-dodger.) The moron vote is unmoved by evidence. What might hurt Kerry is if the Republicans demand of him what the Democrats have demanded of President Bush, a review of his government records. The review of the president's records reveals that he was paid for all his Texas Air National Guard Service pursuant to his honorable discharge. Now, the Democrats want to see his IRS records from that period. Fine, but it is time for the Republicans to demand public disclosure of Kerry's government records -- whether held by the military, the FBI or intelligence services -- with respect to his activities in the antiwar movement and for that matter with respect to his active duty. He brought the matter up, after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr mahs Posted February 12 Report Share Posted February 12 Gtreat read bud.. where did you get it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
igloo Posted February 12 Author Report Share Posted February 12 Originally posted by mr mahs Gtreat read bud.. where did you get it? Townhall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr mahs Posted February 12 Report Share Posted February 12 Originally posted by igloo Townhall Thanx bud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
igloo Posted February 12 Author Report Share Posted February 12 Originally posted by mr mahs Thanx bud This article defines jamirolost perfectly--"The moron vote is unmoved by evidence." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghhhhhost Posted February 12 Report Share Posted February 12 sorta like evidence (or lack thereof) of WMD's??...i duno who the morons are in that scenario... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamiroguy1 Posted February 12 Report Share Posted February 12 Originally posted by ghhhhhost sorta like evidence (or lack thereof) of WMD's??...i duno who the morons are in that scenario... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
igloo Posted February 12 Author Report Share Posted February 12 Originally posted by ghhhhhost sorta like evidence (or lack thereof) of WMD's??...i duno who the morons are in that scenario... Poor example son...since there are many elements to the WMD issue...many of which the "morons" (jamirolost and like) IGNORE....Saying people (on both sides of the fence) are ignoring the WMD issue, or evidence of WMD existence is absurd, and you must be living under a rock if you can not see thatYour little example is inapplicable, as is the MORONS defined in this well written, on point article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamiroguy1 Posted February 12 Report Share Posted February 12 Originally posted by igloo Poor example son...since there are many elements to the WMD issue...many of which the "morons" (jamirolost and like) IGNORE....Saying people (on both sides of the fence) are ignoring the WMD issue, or evidence of WMD existence is absurd, and you must be living under a rock if you can not see thatYour little example is inapplicable, as is the MORONS defined in this well written, on point article Who's ignoring the no WMD in Iraq issue?? The lefties are all over the fact that NO FUCKING WMD's WERE FOUND, JERKOFF!!!It seems that the Bush Administration are the ones that is ignoring the evidence.Fucking loser. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
igloo Posted February 12 Author Report Share Posted February 12 Originally posted by jamiroguy1 Who's ignoring the no WMD in Iraq issue?? The lefties are all over the fact that NO FUCKING WMD's WERE FOUND, JERKOFF!!!It seems that the Bush Administration are the ones that is ignoring the evidence.Fucking loser. lol WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU VOMITING?????Can you be that stupid that you could not understand what I said?....no need to answer...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigpoppanils Posted February 12 Report Share Posted February 12 Originally posted by igloo Poor example son...since there are many elements to the WMD issue...many of which the "morons" (jamirolost and like) IGNORE.... i guess Bill o'rielly is a moron as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
igloo Posted February 12 Author Report Share Posted February 12 Originally posted by bigpoppanils i guess Bill o'rielly is a moron as well? To state for the morons here: NO ONE IS IGNORING THE WMD ISSUE.....NO ONE.....Here is my statement again for the morons who are ignoring my statement (and ironically ignoring the evidence of my statement)""Saying people (on both sides of the fence) are ignoring the WMD issue, or evidence of WMD existence is absurd, and you must be living under a rock if you can not see that"ANd bigpoppindick, since you love to interject one-liners in the false hope of appearing smart---while O'Reilly voiced his displeasure on the WMD issue, he clearly stated that he also did not think Bush lied---something the lefties like to IGNORE--Just like the bullshit 'Bush lied" cry---which is an element of the WMD issue (like originally stated)--where as morons ignore FACTS and EVIDENCE to the contrary and instead stick to the pathetic Bush lied mantra...Look no further to the repeated ass kickings jamirodick recieved on the subject Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
normalnoises Posted February 12 Report Share Posted February 12 ^Yup... This is for YOU Iggy.... Pundit O'Reilly Now Skeptical About Bush Tue Feb 10, 9:25 AM ET http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040210/people_nm/campaign_bush_oreilly_dc_3WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Conservative television news anchor Bill O'Reilly said on Tuesday he was now skeptical about the Bush administration and apologized to viewers for supporting prewar claims that Iraq (news - web sites) had weapons of mass destruction. The anchor of his own show on Fox News said he was sorry he gave the U.S. government the benefit of the doubt that former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s weapons program poised an imminent threat, the main reason cited for going to war. "I was wrong. I am not pleased about it at all and I think all Americans should be concerned about this," O'Reilly said in an interview with ABC's "Good Morning America." "What do you want me to do, go over and kiss the camera?" asked O'Reilly, who had promised rival ABC last year he would publicly apologize if weapons were not found. O'Reilly said he was "much more skeptical about the Bush administration now" since former weapons inspector David Kay said he did not think Saddam had any weapons of mass destruction. While critical of President Bush (news - web sites), O'Reilly said he did not think the president intentionally lied. Rather, O'Reilly blamed CIA (news - web sites) Director George Tenet, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton (news - web sites). "I don't know why Tenet still has his job." He added: "I think every American should be very concerned for themselves that our intelligence is not as good as it should be." O'Reilly anticipated the presidential election would be a close race, adding he thought Democratic front-runner Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites) of Massachusetts would be a formidable opponent against Bush. "It will be a very close race. The nation is divided," he said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
igloo Posted February 12 Author Report Share Posted February 12 Originally posted by normalnoises ^Yup... This is for YOU Iggy.... Pundit O'Reilly Now Skeptical About Bush Tue Feb 10, 9:25 AM ET http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040210/people_nm/campaign_bush_oreilly_dc_3WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Conservative television news anchor Bill O'Reilly said on Tuesday he was now skeptical about the Bush administration and apologized to viewers for supporting prewar claims that Iraq (news - web sites) had weapons of mass destruction. The anchor of his own show on Fox News said he was sorry he gave the U.S. government the benefit of the doubt that former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s weapons program poised an imminent threat, the main reason cited for going to war. "I was wrong. I am not pleased about it at all and I think all Americans should be concerned about this," O'Reilly said in an interview with ABC's "Good Morning America." "What do you want me to do, go over and kiss the camera?" asked O'Reilly, who had promised rival ABC last year he would publicly apologize if weapons were not found. O'Reilly said he was "much more skeptical about the Bush administration now" since former weapons inspector David Kay said he did not think Saddam had any weapons of mass destruction. While critical of President Bush (news - web sites), O'Reilly said he did not think the president intentionally lied. Rather, O'Reilly blamed CIA (news - web sites) Director George Tenet, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton (news - web sites). "I don't know why Tenet still has his job." He added: "I think every American should be very concerned for themselves that our intelligence is not as good as it should be." O'Reilly anticipated the presidential election would be a close race, adding he thought Democratic front-runner Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites) of Massachusetts would be a formidable opponent against Bush. "It will be a very close race. The nation is divided," he said. abnormalnoises----good to see that even a freak like you can be useful.....classic example of useful idiotO'Reilly quote:While critical of President Bush (news - web sites), O'Reilly said he did not think the president intentionally lied.Ironic that all you O'Reilly haters now find him usefulThank you for proving my point.Case closed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr mahs Posted February 12 Report Share Posted February 12 Originally posted by igloo abnormalnoises----good to see that even a freak like you can be useful.....classic example of useful idiotO'Reilly quote:While critical of President Bush (news - web sites), O'Reilly said he did not think the president intentionally lied.Ironic that all you O'Reilly haters now find him usefulThank you for proving my point.Case closed. Forgot to mention that.....Normal is a sack of shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmatas2277 Posted February 12 Report Share Posted February 12 :. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.