pk1 Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 lmaofunny how everyone goes nuts about left handed pitcherslook at the Red Sox staff....notice there are no lefties in that rotation?True but you also have a pitcher who can appareantly pitch better with one ankle than 2. Not going nutz about it but IMO if we can get a good lefty starter and a lefty mid relief it would be a big plus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pk1 Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 1b - Giambi - 7 years @ 17.2 million year2002: $8.0M (+$17.0M signing bonus paid over 6 years)2003: $9.0M2004: $10.0M2005: $11.0M2006: $18.0M2007: $21.0M2008: $21.0M2009: Team option $22.0M or $5.0M buyout3b A- Rod (last year's Gold Glove ShortStop) 10 years at 25.2 million year2001: $21.0M (+$10.0M signing bonus paid between 2001-5)2002: $21.0M*2003: $21.0M~2004: $21.0M~2005: $25.0M*2006: $25.0M*2007: $27.0M*2008: $27.0M~2009: $27.0M~2010: $27.0M~ss Jeter 10 years at 18.9 million year2001: $11.0M (+$16.0M signing bonus paid over 8 years)2002: $13.0M2003: $14.0M2004: $17.0M2005: $18.0M2006: $19.0M2007: $20.0M2008: $20.0M2009: $20.0M2010: $21.0Mbut this is what the yanks will pay arod2004: 142005: 142006: 142007: 152008: 162009: 172010: 182011: Free Agency. Yankees owe $4M in deferred salary ($1M interest free for each of the first 4 years of the deal)Are you the one they call google boy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk4 Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 no but i tryhere is the arod payoutpay R Y2001 $23 $23 $0 2002 $23 $23 $0 2003 $23 $23 $0 2004 $23 $6 $17 2005 $27 $10 $17 2006 $25 $10 $15 2007* $27 $11 $16 2008* $27 $11 $16 2009* $27 $10 $17 2010 $27 $9 $18 Total $252 $136 $116 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfitz73 Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 i think Eric milton will get an offer to be back in pinstripes and Leiter will get a call as he seems to have worn out his welcome in flushing and they are looking to get rid of all the "old guard" on that team LEiter/franco/piazza etc.I hope not... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bxbomb Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 I hope not...on both?or just ALi know he is only a 6 inning pitcher at htis point but its because he cant overpower anyone so he is constantly going to 3-2 on hitters , but the guys still got great stuff and is a leader who loves Newyork and CAN pitch here in NY , ill take emand Milton??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfitz73 Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 on both?or just ALi know he is only a 6 inning pitcher at htis point but its because he cant overpower anyone so he is constantly going to 3-2 on hitters , but the guys still got great stuff and is a leader who loves Newyork and CAN pitch here in NY , ill take emand Milton???I just think we need pitchers that are gonna be around more than a year or two. As of right now, the only locks we have are Moose and Leiber. I'd like to see them give Vasquez another shot rather than trade him somewhere else. Leiter is a decent stop gap guy for a year or two. Like you said, he is gritty and a leader. I don't like Milton at all. The guy had an ERA of just under 5 in the NL... Thats about a 6 in the AL. If you look up his career stats (I'm too lazy to post them) He's just not very good. I'd much rather roll the dice with Halsey... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pk1 Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 Here's an interesting read.From Yahoo Sports:If I'm the Yankees, I'm not trading the best of my meager prospect crop for the Diamondbacks' Randy Johnson, who will be 42 next September. I'm not overpaying for the Marlins' Carl Pavano, a free agent who became a success only recently. And I'm sure not getting excited about signing the Red Sox's Pedro Martinez, who this past season allowed a career-high 26 homers and posted a career-high 3.90 ERA. If I'm the Yankees, I want A's righthander Tim Hudson. Hudson, 29, will be a free agent after next season. The A's might trade him if they can't extend his contract. And Hudson almost certainly will want a deal of at least five years and a higher salary than last offseason's most expensive free-agent pitcher, Bartolo Colon, who is making an average of $12.75 million per year. Think the A's tightfisted ownership will pay that? I don't. True, the A's recently granted third baseman Eric Chavez a six-year, $66 million extension. True, they figure to keep at least one of their Big Three starting pitchers long-term. True, Hudson would appear the most logical investment -- lefthanders Barry Zito and Mark Mulder, eligible to become free agents in 2006, are coming off mediocre seasons. The industry-wide assumption is that the A's will retain Hudson and trade Zito and/or lefthander Mark Redman. General manager Billy Beane consistently has allowed his free agents to play out their contracts, acquiring only draft picks for former MVPs such as Jason Giambi and Miguel Tejada. But imagine what Hudson might bring in a trade at a time when the free-agent market is littered with mainly Nos. 3 and 4 starters. And imagine what the Yankees might do to get him. They're short on the young, affordable talent the A's would want in a deal for Hudson. But Beane and Yankees G.M. Brian Cashman are creative enough to concoct a three- or four-team extravaganza to make it all work, provided owner George Steinbrenner doesn't reassign Cashman to a storage closet in the team's Tampa offices in the wake of the Yankees' historic collapse in the American League Championship Series. The Yankees then would sign Hudson to the contract he wants, and this time they wouldn't be getting another Javier Vazquez. Hudson has spent his entire career in the more hitter-friendly A.L., pitching frequently under pennant-race and postseason pressure. His .702 winning percentage is the third-highest all-time among pitchers with 100 or more decisions, trailing only Spud Chandler at .717 and Martinez at .705. Hudson probably would be the leader with greater run support; his record is 75-2 when the A's score four or more runs in his starts. Again, he won't sign cheaply. He shouldn't sign cheaply. He's too darn good. To part with such a pitcher, Beane probably would want the Yankees to subsidize half the A's payroll, build the A's a new ballpark and donate Vazquez, free of charge. Exaggerated or not, the Yankees soon might be less willing to engage in such largess. Even as the sport braces for another Steinbrenner spending binge, the team might be starting to approach its economic ceiling. The club's payroll, a record $184 million this past season, will soar even higher in 2005. The Yankees already have more than $172.15 million committed to 16 players -- and that figure will rise to $180.15 million for 17 players if the team exercises righthander Jon Lieber's $8 million option. That's $180.15 million without having any idea what first baseman Jason Giambi, righthander Kevin Brown and reliever Steve Karsay will contribute -- and $180.15 million before adding any additional talent. Johnson would cost $16.5 million, and free-agent center fielder Carlos Beltran likely will run between $15 million and $20 million. By the time the Yankees get done fine-tuning their roster, their payroll easily could reach $220 million, putting them an astonishing $92 million over the 2005 luxury-tax threshold. Mercy. Because the Yankees would be exceeding the threshold for the third time, they would pay a 40 percent tax on the $92 million. Tack on that $37 million to the $220 million in player salaries, add at least $50 million in revenue-sharing payments -- the Yankees contributed $52.7 million last season -- and their total payout would surpass $300 million. At that number, turning a profit probably would be difficult. In 2001, the most recent year for which local-revenue data is available, the Yankees took in $217.81 million. Of course, that was before they created the YES Network. Steinbrenner can threaten Cashman all he wants, but he needs the G.M. to help the team escape its financial maze, a task that will be even trickier because of the weakness of the Yankees' farm system. For his part, Cashman might no longer have as much luxury to make mistakes and cover them up with additional spending. Forget Johnson. Forget Martinez. Hudson, a potential Hall of Famer in his prime, would fit neatly in the Yankees' new world order. Who in their right mind wouldn't go after Hudson. IF the A's are willing to trade him I have all faith in Cashman and co. to make it happen. It's funny how the season isn't even over and there is more attention on the Yankees offseason than the world series! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonStephen Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 Are you the one they call google boy?lmaonah, thats what madmax calls bxbomb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk4 Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 "That's $180.15 million without having any idea what first baseman Jason Giambi"that is a retarded amount of money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pk1 Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 lmaonah, thats what madmax calls bxbombGotcha. Good to know. I wouldn't want to confuse the two. Although I think this guy is looking to overthrown the original GoogleBoy. First our baseball team ...now this. Damn you Red Sox fans....damn you to hell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bxbomb Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 lmaonah, thats what madmax calls bxbombwhich is pretty funny since jtk always has exact stats/quotes that he looks up whereas i go off the cuff ,unless im specifically lookin something up to prove his ignorant ass a point and when its done hes screaming GOOGLEboy.... what a joke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk4 Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 you are so full of shit.lol Oh i am sorry that i back up my points with actuall facts. From now on i will use such lines as a-rod blows, jeter takes it in the ass, and kevin brown is a raving lunitic that will be paid 18 million next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bxbomb Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 you are so full of shit.lol Oh i am sorry that i back up my points with actuall facts. From now on i will use such lines as a-rod blows, jeter takes it in the ass, and kevin brown is a raving lunitic that will be paid 18 million next year.chill winston...............exactly my point JTwhen i have gone to the point of looking something to prive that litllte jack ass a point he starts screaming google boy ,yet you go unscathed for looking shit upi have said it before hundres of times how the fuck can you try to belittle someone if there giving you hard facts from credible sources found online?!?!and PS you have used your allotment of JEter is gay statemnets for the next 2 seasons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk4 Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 hahahahah i was just kidding. What is wrong with google boy, since when is backing arguements up with facts a bad thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bxbomb Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 exactly feel free to pass that info on to maggiemax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonStephen Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 exactly feel free to pass that info on to maggiemaxhey googleboy, jeters gay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bxbomb Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 hey greek boyBRADY SWALLOWS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonStephen Posted October 25 Report Share Posted October 25 hey greek boyBRADY SWALLOWS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bxbomb Posted October 26 Report Share Posted October 26 funny thing is , Do you see a correlation/parallel of the careers of Jeter and Brady so farBOth immensely talented , HUge success early on in career nothing but winning championships/ both have GQ looks and are commercially successful Both seem to always say the right things and never get in "trouble"both date models /actresses etc. and if Brady was in NYC hed be at every just an observation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonStephen Posted October 26 Report Share Posted October 26 funny thing is , Do you see a correlation/parallel of the careers of Jeter and Brady so farBOth immensely talented , HUge success early on in career nothing but winning championships/ both have GQ looks and are commercially successful Both seem to always say the right things and never get in "trouble"both date models /actresses etc. and if Brady was in NYC hed be at every just an observationactually I dont see a correlation.....Brady is not a prima donna and does not put himself first over the teamalso, Brady is heterosexual while Jeters gay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bxbomb Posted October 26 Report Share Posted October 26 actually I dont see a correlation.....Brady is not a prima donna and does not put himself first over the teamalso, Brady is heterosexual while Jeters gaywhatever dude , the similarities are def, . there and if you think jeter is a primadonna , your still lostand there are is video out on the internet of Brady taking it in the ass from Teddy Bruschi , so dont be so quick to judge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pk1 Posted October 26 Report Share Posted October 26 whatever dude , the similarities are def, . there and if you think jeter is a primadonna , your still lostand there are is video out on the internet of Brady taking it in the ass from Teddy Bruschi , so dont be so quick to judgeSo I guess that's his new favorite reciever? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calebdead Posted October 26 Author Report Share Posted October 26 So I guess that's his new favorite reciever?omg rolling in the grass, wrestling with squirrels, laughing my fucking nuts off! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonStephen Posted October 26 Report Share Posted October 26 you jackasses dont even realize Bruschis a linebackerbtw, Jeters gay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bxbomb Posted October 27 Report Share Posted October 27 you jackasses dont even realize Bruschis a linebackerbtw, Jeters gay dont sell my yankee bretherens intelligence short . , i think PK meant receiver as a joke, as receiving anal (pitcher/catcher could also be used if we went with Manny and Pedro) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.