Guest endymion Posted August 6 Report Share Posted August 6 Okay so just so that I'm clear about what is going on here...Bush fans are saying that they realize that the president of the United States lied to them about the facts in order to get them to go to war, and that they still plan to vote for him again anyway?What is he going to be telling us in the state of the union address in 2006? Will you believe it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest web_norah Posted August 6 Report Share Posted August 6 my answer is NO *based on all recent speeches and the ridiculous amount of $$ spent of defense - i dont believe for one minute Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbs Posted August 6 Report Share Posted August 6 I believe, at the time the evidence was proposed to bush, bush believed what little evidence he had. He also realized that sooner or later the middle eastern countries can loose themselves to Iraq. With Iraq controlling most of the oil, we are screwed. We would have to use up our oil and when we run out, we are really screwed. Two birds with one stone is what I have said all along.So my answer is no. He did not lie because at the time, the evidence pointed to Iraq. Why would Saddam not let us in until the very, very end when it was too late. Obviously if he was clear and he wasn't such a freakin a-hole, he would have let UN in right from the start and WMD porpably wouldn't have been the reason to go to war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.