bigmahs

I saw that last night, like always great show!

I am not sticking up for brittney in any way but... He doesn't have to put her laundry out man I personally think it makes him look like a sucker. It's the equivalent a woman saying her ex boyfreind has a small dick. It just proves to me he GOT ABUSED by her. I am also a little pissed about his pussy pansy ass remark he made at the award show the other night...

oKAY Mrs. Queen of Negativity How do you propose we deal with the situation....?

DISGRACE!!!!!!!

German economy at a standstill The outlook for Germany's economy is not so sweet Germany's economy stopped growing at the end of 2002, after showing only minimal expansion during the rest of the year. The Federal Statistics Office said there was zero growth in the October to December period, and confirmed that for the whole year gross growth in economic output - or GDP - was just 0.2%. "This was a 'red zero'," said Lothar Hessler of HSBC Trinkaus & Burkhardt. "We still expect Germany to fall into a slight recession in the first quarter [of 2003]." But the October to December data, which showed the economy had expanded by 0.5% from the same period in 2002, was better than some analysts had predicted. Many observers had forecast that the economy would have contracted by 0.1% over the year. Deficit breach The statistics office also revised down Germany's public deficit for 2002, but it was still higher than the EU limit laid down in the Stability and Growth Pact, which underpins the euro. The deficit was revised to 3.6% from an earlier estimate of 3.7%. Eurozone countries are not allowed to run up deficits in excess of 3% of gross domestic product. Germany and France have proposed loosening the stability pact rules if the UN Security Council authorises military action against Iraq. Rate cut? German capital investment in the fourth quarter was up 1.4% compared with the third quarter, and private consumption rose 0.1%, the statistics office said. Germany's influential Ifo business confidence index rose for the second month in a row in February to its highest level in seven months. Nonetheless, the European Central Bank is expected by many analysts to cut interest rates when it meets on 6 March. Exports were up 0.3% on the quarter while imports rose by 1.9% in the quarter as the euro hit near four-year highs against the dollar.

Thanx.

Very good article. I just want to add that the sewage that is coming from some of these professors in these colleges is a disgrace. The ideology that america is this conspiracy and corrupt ridden place is absurd. What good is following socialism if it can't produce results for the society that practices it ie.. the double digit unemployemnt that some of the european countries are experiencing right now. By Silvio Burscoloni's alliance with Washington on the war on terror and Iraq I feel that Italy is trying to adopt capitalism into it's society hopefully the rest of the union will follow.

Analysis: Power Americana By Paul Reynolds BBC News Online world affairs correspondent Might is right, according to Defence Department hawks The US is heading to war with Iraq whatever happens, in another indication of the Bush administration's development of a hard-line foreign policy. Tony Blair might be trying to convince the British Parliament and people that Saddam Hussein can even now, as he put it in his statement on Tuesday, "save [his regime] by complying with the UN's demand". This claim is an insistent one from the British Government. It is designed to appeal to the doubters. It has become less and less convincing. For George W Bush is singing the dominant tune. Saddam Hussein is "playing games", President Bush said, also on Tuesday, about some concessions from Baghdad, and "I suspect he will try to fool the world one more time." European accusations... are countered by American descriptions of Europeans as 'EU-nuchs' in general and of the French in particular as 'cheese-eating surrender monkeys' The conclusion to be drawn is that whatever Saddam Hussein does now will probably not be enough for Washington. US officials are admitting that they only agreed to go back to the Security Council for another resolution in order to accommodate Mr Blair. The new resolution therefore has no real meaning beyond covering, or indeed exposing, the British back. The Americans will go to war anyway. This points the way to the future. For better, for worse, it is one of Power Americana. Single superpower To understand why this should be so, it is worth going back to a project called the New American Century set up in 1997. Founded by two commentators - William Kristol and Robert Kagan - it laid the philosophical groundwork for what was to come. A number its sympathisers later joined the Bush administration, including two of the leading hawks, Paul Wolfowitz and John Bolton. The thinking behind the New American Century helps to explain why the current gulf exists between the United States and some of its allies. European accusations that George W Bush is a "cowboy" or worse are countered by American descriptions of Europeans as "EU-nuchs" in general and of the French in particular as "cheese-eating surrender monkeys". In September 2000, as Mr Bush was running for the presidency, the New American Century team produced a report called "Rebuilding America's Defences". The goal was to "promote American global leadership", the report stated. "As the 20th Century draws to a close, the United States stands as the world's pre-eminent power," it said. "Having led the West to victory in the Cold War, America faces an opportunity and a challenge. "Does the United States have the vision to build upon the achievement of past decades? "Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favourable to American principles and interests? "[What we require] is a military that is strong... a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American interests... and a national leadership that accepts the United States' global responsibility." At first, it did not look as if Mr Bush was that enthusiastic. He said in a presidential campaign debate in October 2000 that American foreign policy had to be "humble". "We must be proud and confident of our values but humble in how we treat nations that are figuring out how to chart their own course," was how he put it. America goes it alone President Bush has his European supporters like Tony Blair who spotted that the president was open to persuasion on some issues, and was in due course persuaded to go to the United Nations over Iraq. However, as president, it was not long before Mr Bush showed that he could also chart America's own course. With the German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder sitting next to him in the Oval Office in early 2001, he dismissed the Kyoto environmental treaty by saying that American jobs were not to be put at risk. Maybe Mr Schroeder remembered that humiliation in the charting of his own Iraq policy later? Then came 11 September. After a shaky start, Mr Bush rose to the challenge when he stood amid the rubble and promised retribution. He went on to develop his own Bush Doctrine, one of pre-emptive intervention. He has since been encouraged on this course by another contribution from the folks who heralded The New American Century. In a book called "The War over Iraq: Saddam's Tyranny and America's Mission", William Kristol, joined this time by Lawrence F Kaplan, stated: "The complacent assumptions of the post-Cold War era were destroyed on September 11. "That day brought us to a new era for which we need a new road map. "If America does not shape this new epoch, we can be sure that others will shape it for us - in ways that neither further our interests nor reflect our ideas. "For the United States this is a decisive moment." 'Democratisation' The former CIA Director James Woolsey praised the book. "The authors show us why - in this age of terror, rogue states and weapons of mass destruction - we can only make the world safe for democracy by finishing the job of democratising it," he said. The new US doctrine is causing resentment in Muslim states "Democratising" the world is an important part of neo-conservative thinking, especially when it comes to the Arab and Islamic world. It does not mean full-scale democracy along Western lines, apparently, but it does mean "reshaping" it to encourage civil institutions and a freer press and so on. Douglas Feith, the US Under-Secretary of Defence in charge of policy and another of the neo-conservatives in the administration, told the New Yorker magazine recently that "democratising" Arab and Islamic countries would help to diminish terrorism. "If [an Iraqi] government could create some of those institutions of democracy, that might be inspirational throughout the Middle East," he said. There is a sub-plot here. One of the products of the New American Century approach is a close alignment with Israel and the inclusion of Palestinian groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad as part of the "war on terror" declared by President Bush. Those right-wing supporters of George W Bush who are Jews have consequently found themselves the subject of political and personal attack. David Brooks, a commentator on the Weekly Standard, the publication of the new right, wrote: "Not long ago I was chatting with a prominent Washington figure in a green room. 'You people have infested everywhere,' he said." Europe divided The response of many Europeans - and some Americans as well, it must be said - has been to regard the New American Century approach with some alarm. For a start, Europeans are far more sympathetic to the Palestinians. But it goes beyond that. Former French Foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine invented the word "hyperpower" to describe the United States and not in an admiring way. In a speech to the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, Chris Patten, former UK Government minister, Hong Kong governor and now European foreign affairs commissioner, said that "in order to be a more credible partner and in some cases to be a counterweight, Europe has to invest in its own security". Europe, however, is divided and its efforts to forge a "Common Foreign and Security Policy" have for the moment, and for the foreseeable future, foundered on the rock of national interest. The New American Century has begun. Email this to a friend Printable version LINKS TO MORE AMERICAS STORIES SelectRumsfeld warns on Iraq armsCardinal testifies at abuse probeDeadly fire at US nursing homeVenezuela violence warningAccused actor makes TV pleaPensioner freed after FBI bungleMystery tile gives Columbia clueUS club fire band to testifyJordan leads from the frontCanucks hammer ThrashersMontgomery pulls outConcorde future 'under review'Ousted chief is new UK envoyJackson seeks footage injunctionUS and China join fusion projectMoore wins Book Of The YearPinochet police on murder chargeDr Reddy's sues Pfizer over drugVenezuela: Chavez's key backersFear kept Americans from HajjProgrammes and Schedules KEY STORIES Saddam interview excerpts Blair seeks to quell Iraq revolt Saddam foes debate future role Turkey faces new US pressure ANALYSIS US still not ready Gathering together sufficient forces to invade Iraq could yet take some weeks. The last lap Can US sway Security Council? BBC WORLD SERVICE News in Arabic HAVE YOUR SAY Can a new resolution succeed? In-depth coverage INTERNET LINKS: United Nations US State Department UK Foreign Office The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites TOP AMERICAS STORIES NOW Rumsfeld warns on Iraq arms US club fire band to testify Mystery tile gives Columbia clue Deadly fire at US nursing home Power

It's a shame.... Picoto is the man and the last time I went to ARC for picotto it was just INSANE but empty.... It just amazes me that ARC brings in all this talent and any time I have been there to hear them it's empty... Also I hope they, Arc doesn't get discouraged if noone shows up especially when the conference is that Teusday,,,

What up PhuturePunkass lol. From viewing your posts on worls topics I see you are still spewing Liberal Sewage:D lol

Because non of us have been educated in some 3rd world fucking hole in the desert we are beneath her??? Who the fuck do you think you are??? Aside from your deformed and obviously biased views on MIDDLE EASTERN affairs where the west is always to blame, you are a minus to any other discussion.

Mirage.

wHAT UP MY LITTLE LOMEIN COMBINATION PLATTER... hold the eggroll I have been stirring up trouble on the Current Events board. How is everything???

Ciao bella. Watch out for us Italian men lol. I read you were in Italy how is everything? how is the booty lol

ISNT VUE. THE OLD 151?

Truth hurts hippie boy!

sUCK IT TIE DYE SHIRT BOY...

Always mix foreign situations?? ie.. North Korea and IRAQ Why do liberals say "What about North Korea" as if the Federal government of the strongest nation doesnt watch N.KOREA every move. North Korea is only paranoid and outspoken because the attention is diverted. Once the operation in Iraq is completed the attention of the United States and it's allies will focus on North Korea. See the N. Koreans might is only good on paper. The republic knows if invaded they couldn't feed their own troops, and Beijing patience with it's little brother rants is growing thin. China's economy is growing and China feels that a nuclear south east pacific could tips the scales of power in the region so I feel that this can be handled diplomatically. In this case diplomacy has just begun and the left is impatient? Ironic....

fawk

:)

:mad:

You lefties Independents or Hippies what ever the hell you beleive in JUST DON'T GET IT.. Here is the beautiful and ingenious plan that the Bush administration is executing..... Let me ask you why is it that the middle east has any say or effect in world affairs whether diplomatically or funding terrorism? you got it OIL. After the RAID on Sadam is complete the oil fields will be on 100% output and eventually lessen the Arab controlled OPEC's grip on our wallets. The Saudi's, the Kingdom not the citizens are commited to the war on terror because they stand to lose billions if they anger their biggest customer. The Middle Eastern governments don't give a fuck about the stability in the region for it's citizens. They oppose the aggressive stance the U.S is taken because they know that if Iraq's oil fields fall in the hands of a democratic gov't which is simpathetic to it's American ally's interests the price of oil will drop, which eventually decreases their power. *****I hate to break this to U tree huggers but Money makes the world go round the more you have the more you command. The Saudi's and other arab countries fear interuption of income from the very pipe line of their influence. Is it about oil? you better beleive it, but it is the arabs that are creating the anti- american sentiment to control the masses. The oil fields of IRAQ could have been ours in 1991... So... Sadam is removed, his WMD stockpile is destroyed, the price of oil drops, american corporate profits improve and stock market goes up adding wood the U.S's furnace the consumer... ingenious!!!!! ******Mark my words when the majority of the Middle East like Iran, adapt to our way of living and not controlled by governments that oppress and are quick to use the american scapegoat for the countries hardships - The MAJORITY of terrorism will stop....

Loser who is the librarian??? Go check if the American conspiracy theory books section is in order, U piker!!!

:clap: GERMANY FRANCE

By the time the information is given to the inspectors and they react, the goods are gone. The element of surprise goes in the toilet when the very phone lines or offices of the UN. inspectors are either bugged or infiltrated by IRAQI intelligence officers. I repeat... Resolution 1441 states that Iraq must comply and disclose all WMD, it was not the beginning of a Scavenger hunt for the U.N. The French and Germans feel that more inspectors will help. Help what??? the Iraqi's prove the irrevelance of the security council and it's socialist members by awarding more time to deceive by dictators who pose a threat to the world. I just don't get peoples logic...