phatman Posted November 20 Report Share Posted November 20 Originally posted by somebitch how is that not true?!?!? if one can't create then what can they do besides use things other people have created? ...there is a working sociological theory that nothing in this world is ever truly created...that everything is but a mere copy of something else...in all aspects of thought, image, etc...it's all been done...we're just regurgitating the same material over and over again...so in essence, even you have no original thought or creation...if that's the case, there would be no such thing as somebody that is creative...that's just one way to look at it...another is, the use of copying for the purpose of creativity...simply put, people recreate original material in a different manner....the rearrangement of song or image in a way it was not used before...by definition, this is creative/creation...that's a second way to look at itbut more importantly, the way i was looking at it in response to what you said was:...to make a generalization like that from one instance such as a sig is ridiculous...if i like a t-shirt you're wearing and ask you where you got it from so that i can get one, does that mean i lack creativity?...it just means, i dig what you're wearing...i would bet this girl didnt even think in terms of creativity when she copied the sig...just took it on as a matter of liking...i think you projected that onto the action...and it's a mistake...now if you're talking pure logic...either one creates or one copies...well, in that light you may be right...but this response is already too long...especially since i do not know if i have made any sense at all... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
girly Posted November 20 Author Report Share Posted November 20 Originally posted by gabo wanna fuck? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gabo Posted November 20 Report Share Posted November 20 ummm were talking about a frigging sig, does it really matter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gabo Posted November 20 Report Share Posted November 20 Originally posted by girly Ill take that as a yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
somebitch Posted November 20 Report Share Posted November 20 Originally posted by phatman ...there is a working sociological theory that nothing in this world is ever truly created...that everything is but a mere copy of something else...in all aspects of thought, image, etc...it's all been done...we're just regurgitating the same material over and over again...so in essence, even you have no original thought or creation...if that's the case, there would be no such thing as somebody that is creative...that's just one way to look at it...another is, the use of copying for the purpose of creativity...simply put, people recreate original material in a different manner....the rearrangement of song or image in a way it was not used before...by definition, this is creative/creation...that's a second way to look at itbut more importantly, the way i was looking at it in response to what you said was:...to make a generalization like that from one instance such as a sig is ridiculous...if i like a t-shirt you're wearing and ask you where you got it from so that i can get one, does that mean i lack creativity?...it just means, i dig what you're wearing...i would bet this girl didnt even think in terms of creativity when she copied the sig...just took it on as a matter of liking...i think you projected that onto the action...and it's a mistake...now if you're talking pure logic...either one creates or one copies...well, in that light you may be right...but this response is already too long...especially since i do not know if i have made any sense at all... even if you only make a slight change to something you are creating something new. it is only copying if you use the original and therefore, that would be lacking creativity. which is in essence what i was saying (with some built in innuendo). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mystify Posted November 20 Report Share Posted November 20 somebitch - sorry that i prejudged (that was hypocritical of me bc i hate when people judge me) but i feel your comment on my other thread was unnecessary and out of line - you know nothing about me or my relationship or converting - and what i posted was a JOKE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phatman Posted November 20 Report Share Posted November 20 Originally posted by somebitch even if you only make a slight change to something you are creating something new. it is only copying if you use the original and therefore, that would be lacking creativity. which is in essence what i was saying (with some built in innuendo). ...but how original is that person if it's only a slight change...i mean is that really creative...eh...whatever...this is tit-tat area..and your inuendo is really what's at the root of this...fuck it...back to work... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phuturephunk Posted November 20 Report Share Posted November 20 Originally posted by mssabina imitation is also the sincerest form of flattery... not that i condone imitation... but it's true... . . fuck flattery . . get your own mind . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mssabina Posted November 20 Report Share Posted November 20 Originally posted by phuturephunk . . fuck flattery . . get your own mind . . . . i agree, i'm just pointing out that people who don't have the ability to think of something original steal from things that they like... take as you will, it's true... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.