Jump to content
Clubplanet Nightlife Community

Draft ?


Felix_Leiter

Recommended Posts

ayone hear of this??

PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO THIS AND DO WHAT YOU CAN! OUR YOUNG PEOPLE ARE THE FUTURE!

Mandatory draft for boys and girls (ages 18-26)

starting June 15, 2005, is something that everyone should know about.

This literally effects everyone since we all have or know children

that will have to go if this bill passes.

There is pending legislation in the house and

senate (companion bills: S89 and HR 163) which will time the

program's initiation so the draft can begin as early as spring, 2005,

just after the 2004 presidential election. The administration is

quietly trying to get these bills passed now, while the public's

attention is on the elections, so our action on this is needed

immediately. Details and links follow.

This plan, among other things, eliminates higher

education as a shelter and includes women in the draft. Also,

crossing into Canada has already been made very difficult.

Actions:

Please send this on to all the parents and teachers

you know, and all the aunts and uncles, grandparents, godparents. . .

And let your children know - - it's their future, and they can be a

powerful voice for change!

This legislation is called HR 163 and can be found

in detail at this website:

http://thomas.loc.gov/

Just enter in "HR 163" and click search and will

bring up the bill for you to read. It is less than two pages long.

If this bill passes, it will include all men and

ALL WOMEN from ages 18 - 26 in a draft for military action. In

addition, college will no longer be an option for avoiding the draft

and they will be signing an agreement with the Canada which will no

longer permit anyone attempting to dodge the draft to stay within

it's borders. This bill also includes the extention of military

service for all those that are currently active. If you go to the

selcet service web site and read their 2004 FYI Goals you will see

that the reasoning for this is to increase the size of the military

in case of terrorism. This is a critical piece of legislation, this

will effect our undergradates, our children and our grandchildren.

Please take the time to write your congressman and let them know how

you feel about this legislation.

http://www.house.gov/ http://www.senate.gov/

Please also write to your representatives and ask

them why they aren't telling their constituents about these bills and

write to newspapers and other media outlets to ask them why they're

not covering this important story.

The draft $28 million has been added to the 2004

selective service system budget to prepare for a military draft that

could start as early as June 15, 2005. Selective service must report

to Bush on March 31, 2005 that the system, which has lain dormant for

decades, is ready for activation.

Please see www.sss.gov/perfplan_fy2004.html to view

the Selective Service System annual performance plan, fiscal year

2004.

The pentagon has quietly begun a public campaign to

fill all 10,350 draft board positions and 11,070 appeals board slots

nationwide. Though this is an unpopular election year topic, military

experts and influential members of congress are suggesting that if

Rumsfeld's prediction of a "long, hard slog" in Iraq and Afghanistan

(and permanent state of war on terrorism) proves accurate, the U.S.

may have no choice but to draft.

www.hslda.org/legislation/national/2003/s89/default.asp entitled the

Universal National service Act of 2003, "to provide for the common

defense by requiring that all young persons (age 18-26) in the United

States, including women, perform a period of military service or a

period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and

homeland security, and for other purposes." These active bills

currently sit in the committee on armed services. Dodging the draft

will be more difficult than those from the Vietnam era. College and

Canada will not be options. In December, 200 1, Canada and the U.S.

signed a "smart border declaration," which could be used to keep

would-be draft dodgers in. Signed by Canada's minister of foreign

affairs, John Manley, and U.S. Homeland Security director, Tom Ridge,

the declaration involves a 30 point plan which implements, among

other things, a "pre-clearance agreement" of people entering and

departing each country. Reforms aimed at making the draft more

equitable along gender and class lines also eliminates higher

education as a shelter. Underclassmen would only be able to postpone

service until the end of their current semester. Seniors would have

until the end of the academic year.

What to do: Tell your friends, Contact your

legislators and ask them to oppose these bills

Just type "congress" into the aol search engine

and input your zip code. A list of your reps will pop up with a way

to email them directly. We can't just sit and pretend that by

ignoring it, it will go away. We must voice our concerns and create

the world we want to live in for our children and grandchildren.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe that the government is planning this. I didn't even read the bill, I'm just going by gut instinct. Bush is already in the hot seat with growing mistrust from the public due to the Iraq war and almost half of polled voters already say they won't vote to reelect him. If he was to institute a renewal of the draft, at this point, it would be the absolute nail in the coffin of his presidency. Unless he pulled a sly one and did it after the election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Distortions. The democrats are the ones pushing this, not the administration. The Pentagon does not want another draft, and with Bush ordering home most of our troops stationed in Germany there will be more units available to deploy if needed...The democrats are hoping if they can't get another draft (especially one with no college deferments and women too) that they will get vietnam style protests at all the colleges... The dems will then start screaming about it's all Bush's fault...Kerry himself has said he wants to increase the size of the army by 2 divisions (which isn't that bad of an idea) but the pentagon says with current recruitment goals being met and the army's reorganization making it easier for units to deploy and more effective with less men, there shouldn't be any need for the draft. Not to mention the military wants to stay with an all volunteer force...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the number of troops that have been and are continuing to be deployed I think the concept of bringing back the Draft is not that far fetched. I'm sure they aren't getting too many new recruits these days... and the bodies have to come from somewhere. There's alot of talk about it and I believe alot of it. The US already supplemets our soldiers with contract soldiers from private firms. The war is costing billions and the military isnt gonna have much money to recruit new kids with the college money gimmick much longer. Requiring people to serve would eliminate the need for those incentives and add more troops... I feel like I'm in the twilight zone... who would even be entertaining this topic 5 years ago????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...