wideskies

yeah, i know what j/k means, thanks. i just decided to elaborate on my thoughts a bit.

in all seriousness, you can't "pick and choose" from a text if you claim it's God's literal word.

it's a really weird "sport." at this point, it isn't about who looks the most attractive or even the most athletic... it's about who can get plain ol' *big.* i know that the judges are supposed to look for some kind of proportionality, but that seems so strange considering these people literally look like bunches of grapes.

the Bible also says that women are men's inferiors, the man being the head of the household and all that. do you believe that too?

when i was younger, i wanted to be named Diana. if i have a daughter, i may name her that. my name means "innocent" or "pure" which is fitting.

i've heard/read about near-death experiences on this stuff. but it seems like it might not be worth the effort.

:| well, work should be almost over, yes? actually, it is... so i shall depart. may your evening bring peace and relaxation.

oh, and about "male nature": since when were women born with a "nature" that makes them want to put color on their nails? that is entirely societal, and society sucks!

again, i ask: why would a woman NEED a manicure herself? the point i'm trying to make is that there are stupid double standards that no one is willing to address because it's too complicated and uncomfortable for them. and btw, = an attempt to show that i was being "cool" and not attacking you directly by saying you were insinuating what i wrote. *scratches head* i guess my ESP isn't working today.

all's fair in love and war, sure... but you have to understand and accept the consequences for your actions. sure, go ahead, be a bitch to random strangers, but don't go crying to mommy when you get punched in the face by said random strangers.

erm.. okay. what i'm bringing up, though, is how people will remark, "ew, her pussy is so beat up! look at her ugly roast beef cunt!" when in fact the woman in question really didn't do anything to deserve it except to have certain genetics.

people tend to complain about "roast beef" lips, large or "misshapen" clits, and the coloration of women's genital regions. sometimes people blame the look of a woman's pussy on her sexual history, but i can't believe that's normally the case. skin, especially down there, is very elastic and doesn't tend to sag much until we grow old. it is my assumption that a woman can't really alter the look of her genitals, regardless of use or lackthereof, and is stuck with the vulva she's got unless she undergoes some kind of plastic surgery. it is also my belief that pussies should be celebrated for their variety of looks, tastes, and characters, not criticized for somehow failing to be "normal" enough--- wtf does that mean, anyway? FYI, genitals as well as the other body parts are airbrushed in porn pics. can anyone support legitimacy of the "worn from use" claim?

yeah, but what useful purpose does having a manicure/pedicure serve for women? oh wait, that's right.. women should sit around daintily and prettily and try not to be move because they're delicate and after all might get bulky muscles if they try anything strenuous!

no amount of ab work is going to give you a six-pack or flat abs (whichever it is you're aiming for) if you have a layer of fat sitting on top of your stomach. in order to reveal your muscles, you'll need to lose fat. to lose fat, you need to exercise and diet responsibly-- ie, reduce your calories *intake* and up your calorie *expenditure* so that you're losing a pound or two a week. don't starve yourself, though: it'll hinder your progress in the long run by messing with your metabolism and generally making you feel like crap. to lose a pound (a combination of fat and muscle... to minimize muscle loss, eat lots of protein and keep lifting weights) a week, you'll have to aim for a daily calorie deficit of 500 calories. for example, you can do that by running for 30 minutes (estimated 300 calories used, depending on body weight) and cutting out 200 calories from your diet--- this can be as simple as replacing candy bars with apples. a little bit of research will help you make decisions regarding your diet. let me know if you want links. as for the abs themselves: work them as you would any other muscle: 1-3 times per week, 2-3 sets, however many number of reps fatigues them (8-12 is a good range to start), etc. you're going for quality, not quantity. people who claim that you have to do 300 reps a day to get a toned stomach are full of shit. those people are just SKINNY. remember, most normal, non-bodybuilding types don't tend to have really cut stomachs because it requires a really low body fat percentage. unless your genetics makes you naturally skinny or carry your fat in other places besides the stomach, don't think that you're doing something wrong if that ripped look doesn't come easily. most women, in fact, will lose their periods before they reach that body fat level because it just ain't healthy for them. i didn't include any links, but i'm sure a few people on here have some good ones.

*killjoy mode* remember ladies and gentlemen, sugary substances put into the vagina can cause yeast infections. those who are concerned about keeping optimum genital health won't let their men slide honey, ice cream, peaches, etc. into their pussies even though it sounds sexy.

i'm not sure there ever WAS any "common courtesy" in our society.

well, from what i've read and heard, growing them can be a real pain! so i can't tell if you're saying you like shrooms or not. shrooms are fun, but taste like ass.

eat more carrots! that'll help combat it.

the article didn't say the law made bringing evidence and witnesses more difficult. i'm not sure where you got that from. did i misread the article and miss some critical info? this is often the situation in alleged rape cases. again, i don't see how (it isn't explained, anyway) it would be any different from what happens now regarding how people try to prove that sex "started out consensual but later became rape." these people seem to agree. *shrugs* joeg: it's true that the court system is royally fucked up sometimes. that's not the fault of the individual laws themselves... as you said, as with any law, interpretation can (and will!) get sketchy.

what i'm saying is that women can ALREADY claim falsely they were raped after the fact. anyway, sex is fun. yay. and sorry about not knowing the exact definition of cock tease.

even without this new law, a woman could (falsely) accuse you of rape, Evan. if the law makes people think twice before they force themselves on a "cock tease" who changes her mind, then it sounds like a good thing to me.

well, Evan implied that if the deed began, the deed SHALL be finished "unless she's in tears or something." the problem is, by the time she's in tears, it's already rape. the concern about stuff being used in court... well.. people ALREADY falsely accuse others of being raped. our court system is there for a reason: to determine whether a law was actually broken or not.

lol, that's what i was thinking. *song caught in head*

... sorry to hear that, people.

i'm not making fun of anyone. i take this very seriously... but it seems like i'm the only one. *slight shrug*