obby

Sorry to hear this. Get well soon.

Did someone say dark progressive breaks???????

See...this guy gets it unlike some other on this board. We may never defeat terrorist 100% but as long as we stay on the offensive, they will be on the run leaving them less time to sit and plan any attacks against us. Sounds like a great plan to me. It has been our tactic since 9/11 and so far it's working.

It took Bush to add teeth to their bite !!!!!!!!

God bless our troops and Coalition forces.

Yup !!!!! Just posted a new thread regarding that. The wheels of the "hate bush" wagon are falling!!!!!!!

Friday, Sept. 10, 2004 9:07 a.m. EDT Media Assault on Bush Collapses in Credibility Meltdown In a stunning journalistic fiasco from which the mainstream press may never recover, a full frontal attack by two out of the three major broadcast networks on President Bush's reelection bid has collapsed amidst questions about forged documents and fraudulent testimony. CBS anchorman Dan Rather's already shaky journalistic reputation was in tatters Friday morning, after documents unearthed during his Wednesday night "60 Minutes II" broadcast purporting to show a cover-up of Bush's National Guard record were called probable forgeries by forensic experts. Story Continues Below Memos uncovered and touted by Rather's team appear to have been written in Microsoft Word, the experts said - a computer program that did not exist at the time Bush was in the Guard. The same documents, purportedly authored by Bush Guard commander Jerry Killian, were challenged by Killian's widow and son, who told reporters on Thursday that the deceased National Guard commander would have never written such memos. A second portion of Rather's "60 Minutes II" broadcast, featuring allegations against Bush from former Texas Lieutenant Gov. Ben Barnes, was also discredited, when his daughter Amy told a Texas radio station that her father was a "liar" who had changed his story to sell a book. NBC News was also mired in a credibility crisis, as a spokeswoman for the network's "Today Show" insisted it was going forward with its planned rollout of Kitty Kelley's Bush bashing book, "The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty" - even though Kelley's key witness against Bush has recanted her account that Bush used cocaine and has accused Kelley of fabricating her interview. "I categorically deny that I ever told Kitty Kelley that George W. Bush used cocaine at Camp David or that I ever saw him use cocaine at Camp David," ex-Bush sister-in-law Sharon Bush said in a statement issued Thursday. Instead, the one-time Bush family insider insisted, "When Kitty Kelley raised drug use at Camp David, I responded by saying something along the lines of, 'Who would say such a thing?'" Still, "Today Show" spokeswoman Lauren Kapps insisted that NBC producers had no plan to cancel or even scale back Kelley's three day mega promotion on the program, touted by the network as the crown jewel of morning TV. "This was a very competitive interview that all the morning shows were after and, as we do with all of our interview subjects, we'll review the material beforehand and ask all the appropriate questions," Kapps said in a statement issued Thursday. "This is astounding," one longtime media observer told NewsMax. "You have a major TV network promoting a book with a major news story that has already been discredited. At least in 1999, when St. Martin's Press found out their 'Bush used cocaine' book was false, they had the decency to withdraw it from bookstores."

Din Da Da - (Bootleg Breaks Mix) Full track soon to be posted on our site www.SoundsOfTheUnderground.com Quick Sample

What makes you think we don't "give a shit about what the rest of the world thinks". I will state the facts....AGAIN. Not myths, not rumors but FACTS!!!!!!!!! FACT!!!!!! - No Country has acquired more power and abused it less than the USA FACT!!!!!! - No Country gives more back to the World in the form of food and aid than the USA (Economic aid and food) FACT!!!!!! - No Country has constantly stood up for other nations and defends their right for freedom than the USA FACT!!!!!! - America always foots the bill or forgives debts to nations world wide. So again I ask.....What makes you think we don't "give a shit about what the rest of the world thinks"???????

What he said !!!!!!

Whose Government? America always foots the bill or forgives debts to nations world wide. Besides, deficits are not "abnormal". Every admin run deficits,,,,YES,,,EVERY ADMIN! Besides, I can't remember a time when liberals ever paid attn. to deficits. They only time they care about deficits is when it's not spent on their failed domestic programs. We have a 10 trillion dollar economy which is currently growing at record pace. Unemployment is down to 5.4% (lower than Bill Clinton had during his re-election campaign against Dole (which was @ 5.6%). It's absurd to assume Kerry would unite the world in w/ a huge coalition to fight terror. When the entire world united to fight Saddam in 1991, over 200 nations united to remove him from Kuwait and Kerry voted against that war. So, plz spare me the "unity" psycho-babble. We don't need to request permission to do what we've got to do to protect our citizens and interests abroad. If a deficit is the result, so be it. What good is a great job, nice car, nice house and fat bank account if you're blown up at a pizza hut? BLAH, BLAH BLAH...............Stop acting like you care about deficits or world unity.....You just hate Bush. Russia was reluctant to help us in Iraq (due to recently uncovered OIL for FOOD kick-backs) and look @ what that got them...... a bus bombing, 2 airlines hijacked and blown up, and 350 innocent people (mostly children) killed by Chechen/Islamic radicals (trained by Al-Qaida). Look at what Spain got? Trains bombed........ GET IT? Stop drinking the Kerry kool-aid guy!

Thank you, thank you, thank you. You hit it right on the nose. 100 % correct

Tuesday, Sept. 7, 2004 9:40 a.m. EDT Clinton Call Leak Sabotaged Kerry Panicked presidential candidate John Kerry had every reason to believe that the conversation he had with ex-president Bill Clinton on Saturday – where the two discussed how to rescue his flagging campaign – would be kept confidential. But that expectation went up in smoke on Monday when Kerry and his campaign aides found explicit details from the Clinton strategy session splashed all over the New York Times and other media. Among the most damaging details to surface: Clinton's strong recommendation that Kerry abandon the crown jewel of his presidential campaign – his service in Vietnam. Kerry himself was plainly mortified over the leak, desperately trying to downplay the significance of the Clinton call by describing the ensuing press coverage as "the most overblown thing." So, who was responsible for the loose lips? The Times cited only "officials with knowledge of the Clinton conversation." The Washington Post was no more helpful, sourcing "those familiar with the conversation." What is known is that "those familiar with the conversation" include just three individuals: Clinton, Kerry and former Clinton press aide Joe Lockhart. And Lockhart later told reporters he wouldn't comment. But somebody commented – and whoever it was certainly didn't seem to have Sen. Kerry's best interests at heart. While we don't pretend to know exactly who it was who spilled the beans, one tidbit that crossed our desk last week offers a clue. The day before Mr. Clinton entered the hospital for heart bypass surgery, the Associated Press reported: "With the national political conventions out of the way, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton embarks Friday on a two-day swing with her husband, the former president, that has the trappings of a personal campaign kickoff. "Sen. Clinton is gearing up for a 2006 re-election bid seen by many as a prelude to a run for president in 2008 should John Kerry fail in his bid for the White House this year." Perhaps Sen. Kerry ought to think twice about answering the phone next time Mr. Clinton calls with fresh advice on how to save his campaign.

If the projections are correct then we may be hit by the upper and stronger part of the storm. NOT GOOD !!!!!! Lets pray that it weakens. http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/watl-ir4-loop.html

In an e-mail letter sent late Wednesday to supporters, RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie warned Republicans to "brace yourselves" -- as the Kerry campaign has begun implementing what he calls "a strategy of vicious personal attacks against the President and Vice President." Gillespie's letter follows: [story continues below...] To: Bush-Cheney '04 Grassroots Team From: Ed Gillespie, Republican National Committee Chairman Subject: Brace Yourselves In response to President Bush's Agenda for America's Future and a critique of his policies and Senate record, Senator Kerry's campaign is implementing a strategy of vicious personal attacks against the President and Vice President. The campaign is bringing in a bevy of former Clinton henchmen, including CNN commentators James Carville and Paul Begala. In August alone, Begala called President Bush a "gutless wonder," said he has a "lack of intelligence," and called Vice President Cheney a "dirt bag." Carville said the President is "ignorant big time" and said "George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are a couple of nobodies." It's not like Bob Shrum needed encouragement to engage in personal attacks. At a Kerry rally Friday morning in Ohio, campaign surrogate John Glenn compared the Republican Convention to a Nazi rally, and Kerry called the President unfit to lead our nation and once again sought to divide the country by who served and how 35 years ago. Of course, the President was called a "cheap thug," a "killer" and a "liar" at a Kerry-Edwards campaign event in New York, Mrs. Kerry has called the President's policies "unpatriotic" and "immoral" and DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe falsely accused the President of being AWOL. Democratic strategist Susan Estrich outlined the strategy last Wednesday in a column warning Republicans to "watch out." "I'm not promising pretty," she wrote before going on to call President Bush and Vice President Cheney alcoholics, then ask "is any alcoholic ever really cured?" ("I can see the ad now.") She deems the President's service as a National Guard fighter pilot "draft dodging," and says, "a forthcoming book by Kitty Kelly raises questions about whether the President has practiced what he preaches on the issue of abortion." (Interestingly, the New York Daily News reported back in February that the Kerry campaign intended to spread such a rumor in pro-life chat rooms late in the campaign.) So the former Dukakis campaign manager has an advance copy of Democrat donor Kitty Kelly's book, which promises to throw unsubstantiated gossip at President Bush in the same way she falsely maligned the late President Reagan as a date rapist who paid for a girlfriend's abortion and wrongly castigated Nancy Reagan as an adulterer who had an affair with Frank Sinatra. A recent story says Kelly's book alleges President Bush used cocaine at Camp David while his father was President, which is as credible as her story that then Governor and Nancy Reagan smoked marijuana with Jack Benny and George and Gracie Burns. And tonight on CBS, longtime Democratic operative Ben Barnes--a friend of, major contributor to and Nantucket neighbor of Senator Kerry's and vice chair of the Kerry Campaign--will repudiate his statement under oath that he had no contact with the Bush family concerning the President's National Guard service. (Anyone surprised that Barnes would contradict a statement he made under oath probably doesn't know his long history of political scandal and financial misdealings.) So brace yourselves. Any mention of John Kerry's votes for higher taxes and against vital weapons programs will be met with the worst kind of personal attacks. Such desperation is unbecoming of American Presidential politics, and Senator Kerry will pay a price for it at the polls as we stay focused on policies to continue growing our economy and winning the War on Terror. http://www.newsmax.com/

Liberal Patriots Last to Get It September 8, 2004 Listen to Rush... (...explain why liberals are, once again, the last to realize we have to fight evil) BEGIN TRANSCRIPT RUSH: Patrick in Burton, Michigan. Let's go to the phones and find out what's out there. Hello, sir. CALLER: Hey, first-time piano player dittos from Michigan, Rush. RUSH: Thanks, sir. Nice to have you on the program. CALLER: Hey, just get right to it. You know, the flap about Cheney. (story) I just wanted to get your take. It's not like I think he's an idiot. I'm a Republican, by the way, but I just wondered if you think there's a point to what he said, even though the media totally twisted his words. What he said, was it unnecessary? Because we were winning anyway, and a lot of people I think were starting to figure that out on their own. RUSH: Maybe so. But, you know, I'm struck, and I appreciate your view. I'm open-minded, tolerant and compassionate, all those things and I appreciate your view. But at the same time, I'm struck by how many people on our side have been waiting for something like this. "Hey, let's play a little hardball here!" and this definitely is hardball. I will not disagree with you on that. But just because you're winning doesn't mean you sit on the lead. You know, we're coming out of a great convention. Kerry is on the ropes. It's about time to square with the American people what we face, and I think with Madeleine Albright coming out and reacting the way she did, "Why, this is the most outrageous thing she's ever heard," blah, blah, blah, blah. She's Exhibit #1, folks. You know, get on my case if you want to for piling on here. She is Exhibit #1. The Clinton administration did diddly-squat. I mean, how many terrorist attacks were there? We cut and run from Mogadishu, (Al-Qaeda-run operation immortalized in the movie) Black Hawk Down. We refused to take bin Laden when he was offered to us three times by the Sudanese. I mean, what more evidence do we need? They didn't take terrorism seriously. Talk to Dick Morris. He was part of the White House staff then. They weren't interested in it at all. Only toward the end of Clinton's second term did they start talking about it. You can go back and you can find, for example, Clinton probably more hawkish on Saddam than Bush has been, or at least equally so -- which I find still interesting that the Democrats want to ignore this and pretend that it never happened, but in doing that, in ignoring it and pretending that Clinton never did that, they're admitting that they never took terrorism, Saddam, or any of these other world threats seriously. You look at what's happening in Russia. You look at what happened. You look at these pictures and you find out this is a worldwide problem. With Vladimir Putin, you've got these people in Russia. Let me tell you something, folks -- and I made reference to this yesterday -- these people in Russia are sending a message to the world. They're not going to put up with this. They're demanding that their leadership do something about this, and so Putin has responded, and he said: We're gonna go search these people out, seek 'em out wherever they are and we're going to take preemptive action on their bases. We're not going to wait for them to hit us again. Screw this! Now, this from one of the guys that was arming Saddam Hussein along with the French and along with the Germans. That's big news today, too. We have learned that Bill Gertz has a blockbuster book coming out, and I've got a little blurb from it here I'll get to in the course of the program today, a blockbuster book in which he has learned that our quote, unquote, "allies," the best friends of John Kerry, the people in the nations John Kerry says he can get on our side if elected president were actually arming Iraq before and during this current war, with missiles, missile parts, engines, a number of things, fuel, because they were on the take! It's all part of the oil-for-food program (news) and the bribe program that Saddam had. These are our allies. Russia, was part of the whole scheme. If you go look at it people, the nations that opposed us at the Security Council -- France, Germany and Russia -- we now know why, and we knew it then. We knew there was something going on. We knew that France had under-the-table deals. We knew that Germans probably did, too. The Russians? We knew the Russians were holding out for some money from us because they had some contracts with Iraq that they felt would be interrupted. But despite all that you take what is happening around the world, and you look at the liberal Democrat reaction today and to and to try to pretend it's not happening? Every time John Kerry says (sing-song voice impression), "I don't waaant to talk about this. Let's taaalk about health caaaaaaare, and let's talk about Social Security." He wants you to forget about the war on terror. They want you to think it doesn't exist. They want you to think it's not serious. They want you to think Bush has caused it by his provocative "swagger." They are unwilling to accept the reality and the reason is, is because they know they're unprepared to deal with it in a powerful or projection-of-power sense. So what Cheney said, to me, may be hardball and it may have smacked you upside the head, but it's right -- and Madeleine Albright is just one of many exhibits that illustrates the whole thing. Kathy in Charlotte, North Carolina. Welcome to the program. CALLER: Rush, good to talk to you. RUSH: Thank you. CALLER: And I just appreciate all you're doing, and keep up the good work. RUSH: You're very kind. Thanks so much. CALLER: (Giggle) When you speak the truth, you're going to be opposed. Hey, I just want to talk about what Cheney said, and I know, exactly as you said, it came across maybe they could take it a little harsh, but there's a reality here! I think people are forgetting that we were attacked on the first World Trade Center, and the Democrats did nothing about it, and I am just studying Kerry and the way the man has no backbone. Having an anti-war president if he were elected, if he were in there, and if we were attacked again. I mean, what's he going to do? RUSH: Well, no wait. W-w-w-wait, wait. That's a good question, Kathy, because John Kerry assured us at his convention that "every attack would be met with a swift and appropriate response." The question is: "What are we going to do prevent those attacks?" and that's where they won't do anything -- CALLER: Well, that's what scares me. It really scares me. RUSH: Because they think doing so will provoke attacks. They don't understand the preemptive defense of the country and they're doing everything they can to dilute, if not destroy, the whole strategy of preemption with their campaign on Bush. I'll tell you, poor old Kerry. He's out there in Cincinnati today (photos), and as I said at the top of the program, he went to the very place that Bush made a speech on Iraq in October of 2002, and he's just got a rabid audience in there, and he got a couple or three decent rounds of applause, but I'm watching this, and there was no energy. Did you see this, Brett? There was no energy in Kerry's presentation today. He looked asleep. Even though I'm sure he's been re-Botoxed. He had a fresh face. I'm just telling you what it looks like to me. (program observer interruption) Yeah, it looks like his heart is not in it. That's a good way to put it. It looked like he just was going through the motions there today, sort of like that thing last Thursday night at midnight. It just didn't seem to be he wanted to be there. There wasn't a lot of oompff and pizzazz, and he didn't really respond to all the applause he got. He just sat there and nodded his head, and he just wanted to keep going and get out of there. You know, you start changing campaign staffs this late? I mean, you go back and look at the presidential campaigns that have done this and they're all losers and that's what this is a sign of. Now, you've got the Clinton people telling him, "Hey, you can talk about Iraq and you need to talk about Iraq, and Iraq is the only thing you can talk about because that's the only place where you think Bush is weak." Well, the problem for Kerry in talking about Iraq is, What does he say, because he's said everything! He said, "I would have authorized the resolution," then he says, "It's the wrong war, the wrong place, the wrong time." He's out there copying Howard Dean, and when he lifts what Howard Dean says ( 1 | 2 ) people are reminding everybody that when Howard Dean said what Kerry said yesterday, Kerry called Dean "irresponsible" and "not suitable to govern." Just like his Cambodia story changes four times; this story of what he would do in Iraq has changed every time he speaks of it changes. So now all the media can do to save his bacon is go back for the umpteenth time to Bush and his supposed National Guard service. We've got a 60 Minutes show tonight, the fourth one, devoted to creaming Bush. This AWOL National Guard story, how many times are they going after this? If I'm the Bush campaign, I got to -- and Bush, by the way, has released all his records. He's authorized the release of all of his records; Kerry hasn't, and I'll tell you this, the swift boat vets are going to keep demanding that Kerry sign the form to release his records. There's a big rally coming Sunday in Washington, and there's another group of Vietnam veterans -- not swift boat vets, but Vietnam Vets for Truth (story) -- and they're going to be demanding that Kerry release his records, and one of the reasons is that the after-action reports that were submitted to justify Kerry's medals were written by Kerry! And that's one of the theories as to why he won't authorize the release of those after-action reports, but the pressure is going to be mounting for him to do so. Now if I'm the Bush campaign, I've got to be sitting there looking at this. "Okay, they're going back to the National Guard for the umpteenth time," and I've got to say to myself, "This is good. They want to continue to fight this campaign over things that happen 30 years ago," that the candidate himself is focusing again on Iraq. His old campaign staff, the ones that got him this far, are telling him not to do it. The new Clintonistas that are conducting this hostile takeover of the campaign are telling him to talk about Iraq. So he went out there and did so today, and here's the reason. It's what I've been telling you. They're looking at the landscape out there. The Democrats have structured it so that the only link they have to victory is discrediting Bush on the war against Iraq. My prediction is you're going to see them regurgitate and sort of bring back to life the whole weapons-of-mass-destruction business and how that was the only reason we went. "Bush lied." There's nothing new they can say and nothing they've said has stuck. But it's pathetic, in a way, laughable in a way, funny in many other ways, but this little thread that Iraq is in ignoble or unjustified. It's criminal. It's unwarranted. We have a thousand needless deaths. That's their link to the White House. Nothing else is going to get 'em there. You know, for all this talk about health care, it ain't the issue, folks. I want to tell you right now. You can talk about health care till you're blue in the face but it ain't the issue. It ain't going to be the issue in this presidential race, just like gay marriage is not going to be the issue and just like partial-birth abortion is not going to be the issue. Those are all going to be subordinated to the War on Terror and what's going on in Iraq, and Kerry can try to change the subject, and say, "We can't talk about Vietnam," except today when it's Bush National Guard day 10. Whatever. You're looking at a campaign flailing around for some solid footing and for a message that they can stick to for a couple days but their problem is they don't have a candidate that can do that. BREAK TRANSCRIPT You know, sitting here thinking about Cheney, and I know some of you people probably, ah, a little alarmed by that. Don't be. I loved it. Zell Miller (Speech: text | vid) redux. Cheney's words very similar to Zell Miller's. It basically is this. The Democrat Party today is controlled by a bunch of 1960s anti-war activists, folks. I don't care whether it's Clinton running the party or Kerry thinking he's running the party; that's who controls it. Their ideology is anti-defense and anti-law enforcement. They oppose the Patriot Act. They oppose military tribunals. They oppose military preemption and virtually every tool and process which strengthens our security at home and abroad. I don't know how much tougher you can say this. I don't know how much more bold I can be and I don't know how much more truthful I can be, but if you listen to the people that run the Democrat Party today, this is what you get: anti-defense, anti-law enforcement. Look at their votes. Listen to their words. They hated Patriot Act. Military tribunals? They're trying to destroy those. Preemption? John Kerry doesn't want to talk about preemption. They're trying to destroy the whole premise. Virtually every tool and process which strengthens our security at home and abroad, they attack. There is a huge difference, a stark difference between Bush and Kerry and the Republican Party and the Democratic Party today, and there's no question in my mind that Bush will keep this country safer than Kerry. It's not because Kerry is "un-American" or "unpatriotic." It's because he's a liberal! He rejects American superiority. He thinks we need to subordinate our power to the world so that we don't threaten them. Don't, doooon't say that I'm being accusatory here, "challenging their patriotism" or their "Americanism" or whatever. It's not. I'm challenging their judgment. These people just can't be trusted. They do not have a proper understanding of their own country, and its role in the world. I mean, there is no question of our superiority in the world, for good, and there's a reason for our superiority, and it's not because we're better people than anybody else -- and that's another thing that bothers them. They think that a bunch of people think we're better than people starving in the Sudan are better than other people. We're not better than people. We just have more freedom than anybody else, and human potential is allowed to reach its heights in this country where it's denied in most other places. That's why we're superior to the rest of the world. We are superior as a nation. We're not superior as human beings. If the rest of the world's people had the opportunities for freedom that we have, they'd be better off; we'd be better off; the world would be better off -- and that's what we try to do, for crying out loud! The word's called "liberate." Not to these people. So when Cheney speaks and says the world will not be as safe if Kerry and his crowd gets elected, he's damn right! He's straight on, folks, and the Clinton administration and Madeleine Albright, Exhibit 1. Kerry is Exhibit 2. Listen to what he's saying. The whole liberal thought process continues to amaze me. I cannot believe how many can feel and how so few of them can think. The illustration today would be, "The liberals are feeling sadness, and they are feeling outrage over the slaughter of over 300 children in Russia. They feel the pain, and they feel the horror, and they're outraged," but they don't know what to do about it! For all their "feeling," they don't think. They do not reason. The horrors that you liberals are grieving are the horrors that other people are fighting! You can sit there and grieve these horrors all you want, but it's not going to get you anything, except maybe make you feel better. These horrors that we are fighting have many names: terrorism, Islamic extremism, Wahabiism, fanaticism, madness! Just plain call it madness, but that's what we're fighting. That's what we're at war with; that's what we have to triumph over. We know it; the Russians are learning it, and now the question is: "Who will learn it first, our alleged allies in Europe or our liberal patriots in America?" because, as usual, our liberal patriots in America are the last to get it. END TRANSCRIPT

Half of the freaking hostage takers where Arab Muslims with Chechyn rebels who have direct ties to al Qaida. but we can always hope for the best and keep our horse blinders on.

LOL Fifth time they try this on Bush. Even when he was Governor. How funny is it that Kerry would not sign for the full release of all his military records. The same records that would prove the swift boat vets to be correct. Only signed for a certain portion to be released. but it doesn't matter people!!!!! Who cares what he did in Vietnam. Who cares if he molested little boys in high school. Who cares if he smoked pot or crack. Who cares if he is straight or gay. It's his last 20 year voting records that defines him !!!!! I think I will call this .........."last tactics"

error

error

After my new property tax increase, enough to smuggle a go fast boat of illegal from the Bahamas. Cheney was blunt and maybe a bit crude, but to put into simple English, that niguh said it like it be. Besides, Bush has been getting hammered forever and you never got offended back then. Believe it or not, freedom is a two way street. Yrs of twisted facts against Bush are a drop in the da' bucket compared to what Kerry has had to face. Cheneys words where 100% to the point. Why do you think 9/11 happened? Our military was under funded along side with our weapons and intelligence agencies. well. Some times the truth is hard to swallow but we still have to accept it. Our nation is at risk and it will take a Republican to strengthen our current weak points. The thin skinned outrage we are currently witnessing from those you seem to agree w/ indicate only one thing. Cheney is right and the track record from those you support speaks for itself. Was is politically incorrect and a bit insensitive,,,,you bet ya'. Was it true? You bet ya'! Suck it up and focus on the issues and Kerry's 20 yr. record and we could avoid all of this. Your problem is not "mean republicans", it's your candidate. You've made your bed, now take a nap and sweet dreams. ps....I've been trying to warn you for some time now. You chose your guy based on electability and now you've got 'em. By the way, did you know he went to Vietnam? LOL Again, enjoy our Country !!!!

Not in our life time!!!! But still sweet.

All and all, we know where we differ on specific opinions but when it comes down to it, we all bleed red. May you enjoy your birthday to the fullest and may they get better as the years go by. Enjoy OBBY

And those that can't or won't vote have no pull in what they say. They will continue to use our/my Country to their benifit for some reason. ????? Good day,