iamme Posted July 12 Report Share Posted July 12 fucking roosters awww, they love u!! :laugh: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mystify Posted July 12 Report Share Posted July 12 2 roosters playing pattycakeI see that too..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funks0ul Posted July 12 Report Share Posted July 12 2 roosters playing pattycakewow, that was pretty lol, i was gonna say 2 ppl playing pattycake! weirddddd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamme Posted July 12 Report Share Posted July 12 its all about the pattycake...and the roosters...playing patty...cake... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nSyNcBaBy Posted July 12 Report Share Posted July 12 the 1st one i saw a bat right away... 2nd one i saw a face of some sort Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tc55 Posted July 12 Report Share Posted July 12 lol, i was gonna say 2 ppl playing pattycake! weirddddd Thats what I was gonna say Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgmodel Posted July 12 Author Report Share Posted July 12 plate II analysis:It is important to see this blot as two human figures usually females or clowns. If you don't, it's seen as a sign that you have trouble relating to people. You may give other responses as well, such as cave entrance (the triangular white space between the two figures) and butterfly (the red "vagina," bottom center). Should you mention the penis and vagina? Not necessarily. Every Rorsehach plate has at least one obvious representation of sexual anatomy. You're not expected to mention them all. In some interpretation schemes, mentioning more than four sex images in the ten plates is diagnostic of schizophrenia. The trouble is, subjects who took Psychology 101 often assume they should detail every possible sex response, so allowances must be made. Most Rorschach workers believe the sex images should play a part in the interpretation of responses even when not mentioned. You may not say that the lower red area looks like a vagina, but psychologists assume that what you do say will show how you feel about women. Nix on "crab"; stick with "butterfly." PLATE III: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjkitten Posted July 13 Report Share Posted July 13 Two witches standing over their cauldren with their brooms fllyin in back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weyes Posted July 13 Report Share Posted July 13 ducks warming up over a fire, their hearts joining above it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamme Posted July 13 Report Share Posted July 13 a very very angry deer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgmodel Posted July 13 Author Report Share Posted July 13 plate III analysis:This is the blot that supposedly can determine sexual preference. Most people see the two human figures. Both figures have prominent "breasts" and an equally prominent "penis." If you don't volunteer the gender of the figures, you'll be asked to specify it. By the traditional interpretation, seeing the figures as male is a heterosexual response (for test subjects of both sexes). Describing the figures as female or acknowledging the androgynous nature of the blot is supposed to be a homosexual response. Does it work? Not really--many straights describe the figures as women, and not all gays give a gay response. A 1971 study at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York showed the traditionally heterosexual response (two male figures) to be declining in popularity. The splotches of red ink are usually perceived separately. Common responses are "bow-tie" or "ribbon" (inner red area) and a stomach and esophagus (outer red areas). plate iv: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funks0ul Posted July 13 Report Share Posted July 13 marko in a leather studded thong with white socks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgmodel Posted July 13 Author Report Share Posted July 13 lmao...:laugh::laugh:...lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glowgrlnyc Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 a map of the continents fused together and mirror imaged Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glowgrlnyc Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 double post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuGaRNSpIcE Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 i might be really tired but i see two birds playing patty cake the analysis for plate 1:The first blot is easy. How fast you answer is taken as an indication of how well you cope with new situations. The best reaction is to give one of the most common responses immediately. Good answers are bat, butterfly, moth, and (in center of blot) a female figure. Mask, jack-o'-lantern, and animal face are common responses too, but in some interpretation schemes they suggest paranoia. A bad response is any that says something untoward about the central female figure. "She" is often judged to be a projection of your own self-image. Avoid the obvious comment that the figure has two breasts but no head. If you don't give more than one answer for Plate I, many psychologists will drop a hint--tell you to look closer...plate 2: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuGaRNSpIcE Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 two beautiful women bending over to pick up a vase plate II analysis:It is important to see this blot as two human figures usually females or clowns. If you don't, it's seen as a sign that you have trouble relating to people. You may give other responses as well, such as cave entrance (the triangular white space between the two figures) and butterfly (the red "vagina," bottom center). Should you mention the penis and vagina? Not necessarily. Every Rorsehach plate has at least one obvious representation of sexual anatomy. You're not expected to mention them all. In some interpretation schemes, mentioning more than four sex images in the ten plates is diagnostic of schizophrenia. The trouble is, subjects who took Psychology 101 often assume they should detail every possible sex response, so allowances must be made. Most Rorschach workers believe the sex images should play a part in the interpretation of responses even when not mentioned. You may not say that the lower red area looks like a vagina, but psychologists assume that what you do say will show how you feel about women. Nix on "crab"; stick with "butterfly." PLATE III: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuGaRNSpIcE Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 someone holding on for dear life while taking a meeeeeeean shit... i guess thats what it looks like to me plate III analysis:This is the blot that supposedly can determine sexual preference. Most people see the two human figures. Both figures have prominent "breasts" and an equally prominent "penis." If you don't volunteer the gender of the figures, you'll be asked to specify it. By the traditional interpretation, seeing the figures as male is a heterosexual response (for test subjects of both sexes). Describing the figures as female or acknowledging the androgynous nature of the blot is supposed to be a homosexual response. Does it work? Not really--many straights describe the figures as women, and not all gays give a gay response. A 1971 study at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York showed the traditionally heterosexual response (two male figures) to be declining in popularity. The splotches of red ink are usually perceived separately. Common responses are "bow-tie" or "ribbon" (inner red area) and a stomach and esophagus (outer red areas). plate iv: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magilicuti Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 some cool threads on here lately. where u getting these pics? shit like this always interested me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
somebitch Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 i see a bat again. an upsidedown one or something. either that or a black abstract outline, one that is symmetrical Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
somebitch Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 2 roosters playing pattycakewow, that was pretty lol. it does look like 2 chickens/roosters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgmodel Posted July 15 Author Report Share Posted July 15 Plate IV is the "father card." At first glance it is a difficult blot to see as a single image. The "boots" are fairly conspicuous; between them is the apparent head of a dog or Chinese dragon. Many subjects see the blot as an animal skin. After a few seconds, though, most can see it as a standing figure seen from below.The boots become the feet, enlarged because of the unusual perspective. The arms and head, at the top, are smaller. Common descriptions are bear, gorilla, or man in a heavy coat. Bad descriptions are monster or attacking bear or gorilla-Rorschach theorists equate your description of the figure with your perception of your father or male authority figures. plate v: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
somebitch Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 looks like a bat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glowgrlnyc Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 bat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murrrr Posted July 15 Report Share Posted July 15 a rabbit w/ wings, lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.