zlatang

i miss shook he was so....genuine

yes the bitch part suits her...

excellent ideas you are so creeative

yeah if one has more...i hate those m,oments when it runs out

:D

train me instead!!!

oh please don't. poor dawgie....

ok even if it's true, i don't understand this urge for exibitionism....

dear kitten:rolleyes: i never said i diskied her because she's p/r! where did you get that? i think pam anderson is also trashy, and she's white (as far as i know). please restrain yourself from suggesting things i didn't say.

gawd are you like.....12 yo? grow up girl -- looking good is not about being a p/r version of a barbie doll....

i think you are an obsessive-compulsory wannabe-writer. and i'd suggest you try more drugs and write a lexicon of drug abuse...

shush....he seems to have an audience here...believe it or not

awww just when i thought we'd better move to the *drama* forum..thank you for accepting my opinion about a third party without taking it personally (sounds reasonable, but many would have reacted otherwise and be offended) and also you should know that i do respect your opinion even if it is different than mine.

i can't explain further -- perhaps it is the unappealing music of hers that makes her appear as cheap; i also think that there is no sense of aesthetics (if you will) in any hip-hop or even pop music, or in the accompanying video production. it's all about cheesy and cheap sex appeal mixed with a wannabe-model attitude attained through purchasing labeled clothes (i remember a similarly cheap singer wearing a gucci-signature dress in her video -- how vulgar!). and what is classy about that? also i don't understand why sucha fuss about this -- i dislike her and you like her and that's ok. why am i taken into account and asked to *explain myself*? i may dislike her in the same way one dislikes a colour (in this case it'd be a fluorescent and intense colour) or a scent (i don't make an analogy for this one!).

i tried the beige ones and they ranged from excellent to bad....you can never know with E

i am not sure i can explain why i think she's cheap. but your analogy with porn stars who flaunt their *qualities* makes it clearer. it is just the way she looks that makes her cheap, and she can wear whichever and it won't help. but as you so rightly said, it's the matter of taste. i would choose bjork over her in a second, regardless of the fact that bjork is not nearly as well-proportioned as j-lo. i mean, c'mon, starting with that "j-lo" thing, doesn't it have a cheap (bling-bling-ish) ring to it?

i loved the comment on yesterday's fun... *sigh* it's also nostalgic in a way. i do think however that pills are so bad nowadays and that one can rarely find a good one (help!!!). every now and then i find a good one, and then one is enough for 4 hours of fun (as opposed to many which don't work). i wish i could have that 1999 playboy again...oh well...it's zoloft time now LOL

hey what about xanax? that helped me...

awwww that's why i think the white lady* is way better, however more expensive it is. i feel for you -- we shouyld start an after-e-support-group or forum (hey if there is a separate *hip-hop* forum, why not?)

well it's just the result of this recent mania for the hippie/'natural'/neo-macho look (see the new ad for M7 by gucci, featuring a very hairy guy)...it always looks dirty to me....

lol she is SO CHEAP, nothing helps -- not a thousand fendi or even mcqueen dresses will take that away from her....

agwd what is so surprising about that? she's just an airhead...with some ppl who take care about her looks, and when she takes things in her hands....

too bad you were just joking

is this a joke? anti-guido based in NJ?