brooklynkid

That's not many posts for many of you but for me it's a lot. Or something.

You might also want to check out a Fujifilm. I use a Fujifilm Finepix 4.3 megapixel for the photography on my site http://brooklynkid.com Also, my GF uses a Canon Digital Elph for her site http://rion.nu You can a good idea of the picture quality from those sites.

that's something I'm working on...

ahhh to be under 23 again...

Whaaaaa??? What's next, UFO's crashed in the desert? Seriously though, that theory has been put through the ringer for almost 30 years now. Everyone ever involved with Scooby Do has denied their implied association with drugs. Now someone describe for me the weird relationship between Peppermint Patty, Marcy, and Charlie Brown.

(A) Adam Freemer - H2O (O)

I'd say get him that Harry Potter vibrating broomstick but it's been discontinued:

(P) Peace Division - Do You See Me (E)

(E) EMC - Saeta (A)

No way...you're lying. That's totally legal as long as it's lower than 10 floors.

(X) X-Press 2 - Smoke Machine (E)

(U) Underworld - Two Months Off (F)

(Y) Yin Yang - Yoko Ono (Peter Rauhofer Mix) (O)

I didn't do very well. I thought the collision detection was whacked.

Sorry if those-cooler-than-me have seen this, but I thought I'd share the link: http://www.hostultra.com/~opie/jackson_baby_drop.swf

One of my all time faves: Bedford - Haktan O'Nal

yeah and you make it seem as if someone is holding a gun to your head and making you read this "debate". There are plenty of other mindless threads of people posting smilies to read. I don't expect anyone to say "OH HES RIGHT!! SMOKING SHOULD BE BANNED". Why would I? I was just trying to explaining the reasoning behing the passing of a law that will affect everyone around here. Please don't try to police this board.

Fired Up - Funky Green Dogs

c'mon now I would expect you of all people to understand. Why is OK that there's so much bullshit noise on this board but when there's some light debate everyone starts shitting their pants. I don't ever argue for the sake of arguing but when I feel that people are blatantly wrong I might point it out to them. A little education never hurt anyone.

No, polluting hasn't always been illegal. Up until the mid 1900's there were almost no restrictions on what can be buried, dumped into the ocean, or spewed into the air. It's only when people started to discover the negative toll on the environment that the gov't started to outlaw and regulate these things. Exactly, just like I don't smoke, I don't want someone forcing me to against my will. And I thought you weren't blaming anyone for your addiction. No one has been selling addictive cigarettes to you. You've been buying them on your own free will. You knew all the bad things before you even started but chose to ignore them. And who could blame them? Have you seen how much $$$ cig companies are losing in lawsuits these days? But fear not, your gov't will be there so long as they can keep collecting taxes. In this case (NYC smoking ban) this has nothing to do with getting people to quit smoking. Specifically, this is about protecting the health of employees in smoking establishments. Regardless of the benefits non-smoking patrons receive from the ban.

You were using addiction as an excuse to oppose the law: "The jackasses, such as myself started when we were young and are addicted now to something that is sold LEGALLY." And you're repeating my point for what reason? This is why they are banning smoking indoors, because it is considered air pollution. exactly. you're getting it now! right again! you mean smart people who use common sense? No, most drinkers are not social smokers. Maybe like 20-30%. No hard feelings either...just trying to keep it real:D

damn long post bug!