I agree, getting Osama is more important than anything else. However, I don't agree with you when you say we left Afghanistan to invade Iraq. We never left Afghanistan. Would we have had a better chance to get him if we had more manpower? Of course. I'm not going to dispute that. But as I stated earlier, I think Saddam was most definitely a threat. And from the very beginning, the President made it clear that the war on terror would take place on MANY fronts. You can't tell me that the Iraqi government had no connection to terrorism. The 9/11 Commission found that Iraqi officials held meetings with al-Qaeda higher-ups. Now, the Commission also found that Iraq never allowed them to set up in Iraq, however, terror groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and al-Aqsa have all been found to have ties with Iraq. Saddam Hussein had the equipment, the funding, and the balls to produce and use WMD. He was a threat. Saddam Hussein, himself, was a weapon of mass destruction. I think that invading Iraq as a political move is a ridiculous theory. Bush's approval rating was around 80% and he knew that a war with Iraq would bring dissent.