jamiroguy1

He is a moderator, jackass.

Poppa nils is right. Hitler was Catholic.

lol Excellent. Forgot all about this.

I don't think the sun tan lotion can help a pitch fork being shoved up his ass. The evil bastard.

This is true. I'm thinking about all the money I saved on not having to buy presents for her this year.

I concur.

I didn't read it. Can someone paraphrase for me, please.

I got a 55 inch Phillips widescreen HD TV. Woooohooo! Coming today actually. Santa came through on the last minute. But lost my girlfriend.

I wanna go.

You understand history so well.

Because everyone isn't an evil cock smoker like you. Sorry but you're a big dick in my book so I could care less what the hell you think after you showed delight over 20,000 people dying you sick fucktard.

I agree with Igloo in that both sides bare responsibility in the death lock the israelis and palestinians have put themselves in. If it means getting rid of Arafat and Sharon too, I'm all for it.

edit: double post

I don't get this headline. Does this mean he's saying that he the kids are turned off now and don't want to come to neverland? lol

I read an article in 'Details' one time talking about the iran club scene. Of course it's all underground. Partygoer's could get killed if they're caught. You gotta really want to dance if means you could get killed because of it.

Let's not turn this into a partisan debate. Obviously, this is an extreme case of a frivalous lawsuit from someone that is using their kid for money. But let's agree that there are plenty of cases on both sides of the debate where money should or should not be awarded. For example, breast implant malpractice lawsuits.

I think all troops there would rather be home with their "girlfriends/boyfriends/family whatever then be in Iraq.

Very ignorant statement.

Sharon should really get tried as a war criminal. For those who don't know about the massacres of Sabra and Shatila, you should really read this before you start pointing fingers on who should not be in their elected office. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1779713.stm An unknown number of Palestinians died in the 40-hour slaughter

Dude... This title of this thread puts you right up there next to satan, you godless fuck. It's not funny and shows everyone in this forum how much of a jackass you are. Happy holidays, asshole.

Wait.. Sharon is not responsible for this?

Sometimes I wish frivalous lawsuits, obvious one like this at least, should be counter sued for lost court time if they don't prove their case. How screwed up is this kid going to be with parents like this?

**BUMP** Full text of the letter from the thirteen reservists To: Prime Minister Ariel Sharon We, citizens who serve in active reserve duty, soldiers and officers, Sayeret Matkal veterans, have also chosen to join the front guard in the way we have been trained. With grave concern for the future of Israel as a democratic Zionist and Jewish state, and with concern for her moral image – we can no longer stand asside. We tell you today: *We shall no longer lend our hand to the subjugation taking place in the territories. *We shall no longer lend our hand to the quelling of human rights of millions of Palestinians. *We shall no longer serve as a defense shield for the settlements campaign. *We shall no longer deface our human image as an army of occupation. *We shall no longer deny our commitment as fighters in the Israel defense forces. We fear for the fate of the children of this land, exposed to an evil that is unnecessary, and to which we have lent our hands. We have long transgressed the limits of soldiers, just in their ways, and have become fighters suppressing another nation. We shall not cross this limit anymore. We stress and declare: We shall continue to protect the State of Israel and the security of its people from all enemies. "He who dares – wins." http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article2286.shtml

I thought he was talking about fox news. lol

THE PROBLEM OF NATIONAL REVIEW http://acuf.org/issues/0312010news.asp Where was the premier journal of the conservative movement during the greatest assault on limited government in the past forty years, as Congress was poised to pass a new $7 trillion entitlement to vastly expand the welfare state? In its relevant edition, National Review only had room for one short item about what was also the biggest news of the week, that Republicans had created a new Medicare prescription drug benefit with an unfunded liability larger than that for its historic bet noir, Social Security. Curiously, National Review spent most of that little space criticizing Teddy Kennedy-who had nothing to do with the Medicare prescription drug bill's passage. It was as if NR felt comfortable living in the past with recognizable bad guys, not able to come to grips with the fact it was conservative GOP leaders who had designed the largest increase in entitlements since the Great Society. Indeed, there was no mention of conservative members of Congress or the president at all. It waited until the very last phrase of the editorial to call this terrible bill part of a "dismal milieu," as if nothing could be done about this mysterious specter in Washington. To NR, a "legislative juggernaut" had been created by the "White House" (not President Bush or Republican leaders) and the AARP to which conservatives should presumably acquiesce. Full Article © 2003 American Conservative Union Foundation 1007 Cameron Street, Alexandria, VA 22314 Tel: 703.836.8602